Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

£1500 debt to Cahoot / Clarity - Make us an offer!!!


debpayne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4006 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I am a little uneasy as I have a letter from Clarity arrived today regarding a £1500 debt to Cahoot

in which it states

"As time is running out our client has advised us that they will consider any offer, however small, to settle the balance"

 

I can't help but feel that this is a letter designed to catch me out and what will happen if I offer £50...

 

.it does say "however small". Has anyone experienced this type of letter?

 

Thank you

 

Deb

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the big boys on the site will want to know more about the debt. Such as are Clarity just acting as a DCA for Cahoot. Do you indeed owe Cahoot this money. When is the debt from and are you paying anybody anything at the moment? No doubt others will be along soon but they will what to know more about the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time running out? For what?

 

Ignore it. Any offers of a discount = debt is bad.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, do you know anything about/acknowledge the said debt?

If so, what was it for?

What's showing on your credit file?

has a default been registered?

Have you had a "Notice Of Assignment"?

Is it likely to be Statute Barred?

Have you made a CCA request or a SAR?

Have you been paying them?

 

Huge offers of discounts are usually an indicator of an unenforceable claim as has been advised.

 

If they try contacting you again, make sure you stay off the phone.

 

With more information, people will be better able to help.

 

H. x

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks, yes I do owe the money and this debt was originally being chased by Cabot but I have just not been able to make repayments. Prior to that I was paying it off via a payment plan with moorcroft but after several hospital stays fell really behind and got snowed under with all my bills.

 

I think I did have a letter telling me Clarity would now be taking over the debt but I'm unsure. It's not statute barred, It is showing as a default but basically I do owe them the money and would like to pay it off but am worried as to what will happen if I do make an offer and what should my lowest offer be. I can;t afford much as am really struggling but if I make them a low offer I am dubious as to whether they will say no and now that you have admitted it you must pay the lot and we're taking you to court!

 

Many thanks

 

Deb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Deb.

 

Right, thanks for the info.

So, as you admit that you are liable for the debt, and quite rightly (and honestly) say that you'd like to pay it off, you now need to know exactly how much you owe.

Firstly, have a look at correspondence. Have Clarity said that they "own" or have bought the debt?

 

If so, they are the people you need to deal with . Is the debt for a credit card or loan? In which case, you may be owed mis-sold PPI on it.

The best way to find out is via a SAR, if appropriate, or a carefully worded letter to the original creditor, asking them to let you know if PPI was taken out on the original debt. It can sometimes save you the £10 fee if the OC is amicable, if they no longer "own" the debt. Any mis-sold PPI could honestly and legitimately wipe the debt anyway.

 

As you're being offered what seems like a huge reduction in the amount owing, then, as advised above, there could be something wrong/unenforceable about the original agreement - when was it taken out?

This line of enquiry is, of course, up to your own moral outlook, but if they can't supply an original CCA if the case dates from before April 2007, then it may turn out that you need make no offers of payment whatsoever.

 

Hold off for the moment - the matter of Full and Final settlements is always awkward. The general view is that an offer of around 20% is the norm, although with VERY strict stipulations on your part. Again, a little more info would be helpful.

Edited by Halibutt

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could give more info on the debt, but as its obvious the debt is bad hence the discount offers, i would advise ignoring it. If you really want to play around with the muppets, just send a CCA request or even better, a "prove it" letter. Do NOT acknowledge the debt with them or contact them by phone.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your replies guys, much appreciated....

 

Iam sure the amount they have said is the amount I owe as I occasionally get statements sent from Santander (they took over Cahoot) also in the letters they say Santander are their client so it appears that they are acting on their behalf and they say "our client has advised they will consider any offer, no matter how small" Because I want to get rid of this I was wondering should I just offer £200-£300 as they do say any amount, no matter how small The debt was a flexible loan with Cahoot many years ago but I did make payments off the balance to moorcroft up until about a year ago so I have acknowledged the debt! I also don;t think I paid PPI on this but should I write to Santander anyway and if I do should I ask Clarity to allow me time to do this? Cabot wasn't involved, that was an error by me...sorry If I do write offering a figure for settlement please could you help me word it so I am not dropping myself into hot water.

 

Really appreciate your time and help

 

Deb

Link to post
Share on other sites

In light of all the new information and agreeing with what Renegadeimp says, I'd be inclined to send a CCA direct to Santander. Accompany it with the statutory £1 fee by postal order.

Keep a copy of your letter and note the postal order number (keep the receipt).

Send via Post Office recorded delivery and see what they return.

They have 12 + 2 working days to respond.

That shouldn't affect any of their offers of reduced payment as Full & final, but will give you time to think AND give you evidence whether or not they do have the documents they need to proceed.

 

I respect what Renegadeimp says, but in this case, because of what you've said, a "Prove It" letter might seem a little churlish maybe? A simple CCA request would be appropriate, I think.

Happy to be contradicted if anyone has a better course of action.

 

Let us know how you get on anyway and we'll take it from there.

 

Do sleep well and don't worry. ;)

 

H. x

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA goes to the company chasing you. SAR goes to the OC. If the DCA cant come up with the CCA, then thats 2 birds with one stone.

Edited by renegadeimp

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi debpayne

 

Thought you might like to know that I too received one of these letters from clarty.... AFTER cbot served me with a Statutory Demand, sounds like your letter is exactly the same as mine.

 

I have a court hearing this week, and am using this letter as part of supplementary witness statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...