Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I will try again...................... Even at my age there is quite clearly a PCN envelope by the windscreen wipers on your car on some of the photos.  But as I said in the IPC letter, that is not the dispute. The dispute is that CPM sent you the second PCN on the 28 th day of the issue date of the first PCN. It should not have been sent until the day AFTER the original PCN was issued. Therefore they broke the Act, they breached the IPC Code of Conduct and their agreement with the DVLA. It is something that the IPC cannot ignore since to do so will bring the ICO down on them and the DVLA should ban CPM from getting data from them once they know if the ICO do nothing. The minimum I expect is that your PCN will be cancelled. But it is up to you. I have given you the details, you have copies of both PCNs sent to you on the sar  with all  the relevant dates. 
    • Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card   An HM Armed Forces Veteran Card is a way to prove that you served in the UK armed forces. The card can make it quicker and easier to apply for support as a veteran. It’s free to apply. You can currently only apply for a Veteran Card if you have a UK address. Veterans who do not have a UK address will be able to apply later this year. READ MORE HERE: Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Apply for an armed forces veteran card to prove that you served in the UK armed forces.
    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
    • it doesn't matter what you are being charged or if you missed the discount period. you ain't paying anyway..... if this ever gets before a judge. then the ins and out of POFA2012 or any IPC/BPA guidelines might come into play. until then i go get on with your life. you are spending far too much time on a speculative invoice scan scheme  its almost as if you believe these are fines and enforceable in a criminal court and you could have bailiffs at your door any minute.    
    • Debt Respite Scheme (Breathing Space) guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) but dont get scammed into a DMP. simply tell whomever you call to simply apply for the BS for you.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax credits joint to single claim?


caz246
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4073 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI, I'm looking for some advice.My partner lost his job a few weeks ago and we have made the decision for him to move back to live with his parents in order to find a job as we can no longer afford to live together. His parents live a 4 hour drive away so he would visit every other weekend (his parents will help with travel costs) as we have a young son. This is not an ideal solution but our only one at the moment (we have looked at several options over the last few weeks) I work 30 hours per week and my son is in childcare so my question is would I be eligible to make a single tax credit claim? We are hoping that he will get a job and then we will consider relocating, I have enquired about a transfer through my work to an office near his parents but this could take several months to happen.I need to know if this is something I can do, we will still be a couple but until he finds a job and we can move to be with him he will be unable to help support us financially. I certainly don't want to make a single claim if this is classed as fraud.Thank you for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It'll only be classed as fraud if it is fraud usually. If you're going to do this, do it properly that's all I will say. Make sure he is registered properly in every dept as living with parents. It really won't work just putting down on paper that he has moved out tbh. Otherwise everyone would be doing it.

If he stops over with you every other weekend & is sending you money for food & bills etc, you are not single & still a couple.

A guy away in the army or driving a long distance lorry is still classed as being a couple for example.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It'll only be classed as fraud if it is fraud usually. If you're going to do this, do it properly that's all I will say. Make sure he is registered properly in every dept as living with parents. It really won't work just putting down on paper that he has moved out tbh. Otherwise everyone would be doing it.

If he stops over with you every other weekend & is sending you money for food & bills etc, you are not single & still a couple.

A guy away in the army or driving a long distance lorry is still classed as being a couple for example.

 

Thanks for your reply.No I understand that, if he was earning then of course he'd be supporting us but he isn't therefore can't provide for us financially, hence us having made this decision. As soon as he gets a job we plan for my son and I to move to be with him again as there is better job prospects than where we are as it took him over a year to find his last job.I agree it is a grey area I always do things by the book so I just want to make sure I am doing so in this situation as it's not something I know enough about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're right to question it. These days before you know it they are hauling you in for interrogation based on just the Sky bill being in your exes name. So you need to be one step ahead of them with all the proof.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything is already in my name bills wise at the moment, I have already spoken to my landlord to have the tenancy changed to just my name and will inform council tax and the electoral roll when he makes the move next week. His car insurance will have to be changed to his parents address and he is going to change address with his bank alo, there is nothing else in his name here. I'm trying to focus on the all things happen for a reason thought and that us making the move will actually tuer out to be the best thing for us if my partner can get a job. I have always worked and never claimed any sort of benefit until my son came along and was actually shocked to discover we'd get tax credits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may be looked at for a fictious desertion/separation claim

If you are geographically separated but still maintaining a relationship then technically you could still be expected to remain as a couple for any benefit claims.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may be looked at for a fictious desertion/separation claim

If you are geographically separated but still maintaining a relationship then technically you could still be expected to remain as a couple for any benefit claims.

 

Ok thank you for that I will need to look into that then, this is exactly the type of advice I am looking for. I wouldn't be lying saying we have split up as we haven't, we just wouldn't be living together and as alot of people are in a relationship but don't actually live together I thought that maybe this would be a similar situation. What a mess, can't wait to get back on our feet. Hopefully my partner finds a job very soon it would save all this stress and worry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fictitious desertion2.Fictitious desertion is considered to have occurred when a claimant suggests that their partner has left the address. However, evidence later comes to light to demonstrate that they had never separated and had continued to live together as a couple throughout the period concerned.Found this online, we wouldn't actually be living together, he would be a 4 hour drive away so not like we'd be making that up.Collusive separation3.Collusive separation is when the partner has left. However, they may have separated after agreeing to a course of action, for example, to take advantage of the benefits system, the partner moves out for a short period of time with the intention of moving back after the claim to benefit has been processed and payment commenced.I can see how people would do this, but our intention it to relocate as soon as partner finds a job. In no way are be trying to take advanatge of system. Suppose all I can really do is be upfront and honest about everything then that way I know I've did everything as I should.

I have tried to edit this as it is not posting in paragraphs for some reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...