Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My understanding is that they won't provide the name to me whether the investigation is Live or Closed, & I have no legal rep as I didn't have P.I. Cover on my policy, & am intending to claim using OIC.org.uk, but remain completely stuck as they 100% cannot open a claim on the portal without both the Reg. No. & Name of the other driver.  
    • thanks again ftmdave, your words are verey encouraging and i do appreciate them. i have taken about 2 hours to think of a letter to write to the ceo...i will paste it below...also how would i address a ceo? do i just put his name? or put dear sir? do you think its ok?  i would appreciate feedback/input from anybody if anything needs to be added/taken away, removed if incorrect etc. i am writing it on behalf of my friend..she is the named driver  - im the one with the blue badge and owner of the car - just for clarification. thanks in adavance to everyone.       My friend and I are both disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of your agents.   I have been incorrectly 'charged' by your agent 'excel parking' for overstaying in your car park, but there was no overstay. The letter I recieved said the duration of stay was 15 minutes but there is a 10 minute grace period and also 5 minutes consideration time, hence there was no duration of stay of 15 minutes.   I would like to take this oppertunity to clarify what happend at your Gravesend store. We are struggling finacially due to the 'cost of living crisis' and not being able to work because we are both disabled, we was attracted to your store for the 10 items for £10 offer. I suffer dyslexia and depression and my friend who I take shopping has a mobility disability. We went to buy some shopping at your Gravesend branch of Iceland on 28th of December 2023, we entered your car park, tried to read and understand the parking signs and realised we had to pay for parking. We then realised we didnt have any change for the parking machine so went back to look for coins in the car and when we couldnt find any we left. As my friend has mobility issues it takes some time for me to help him out of the car, as you probably understand this takes more time than it would a normal able bodied person. As I suffer dyslexia I am sure you'll agree that it took me more time than a normal person to read and understand the large amount of information at the pay & display machine. After this, it took more time than an able bodied person to leave the car park especially as I have to help my friend on his crutches etc get back into the car due to his mobility disability. All this took us 15 minutes.   I was the driver of my friends car and he has a blue badge. He then received a 'notice to keeper' for a 'failure to purchase a parking tariff'. On the letter it asked to name the driver if you wasnt the driver at the time, so as he wasnt the driver he named me. I appealed the charge and told them we are disabled and explained the situation as above. The appeal was denied, and even more so was totally ignored regarding our disabilities and that we take longer than an able bodied person to access the car and read the signs and understand them. As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us. I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge.     After being discriminated by your agent my friend decided to contact 'iceland customer care team' on my behalf and again explained the situation and also sent photos of his disabled blue badge and proof of disability. He asked the care team to cancel the charge as ultimately its Iceland's land/property and you have the power over excel parking to cancel it. Again we was met with no mention or consideration for our disability and no direct response regarding the cancellation, all we was told was to contact excel parking. He has replied over 20 times to try to get the 'care team' to understand and cancel this but its pointless as we are just ignored every time. I believe that Ignoring our disability is discrimination which is why I am now contacting you.     I have noticed on your website that you are 'acting' to ease the 'cost of living crisis' : https://about.iceland.co.uk/2022/04/05/iceland-acts-to-ease-the-cost-of-living-crisis/   If you really are commited to helping people in this time of crisis ..and especially two struggling disabled people, can you please cancel this charge as it will only cause more damage to our mental health if you do not.  
    • I've also been in touch via the online portal to the Police's GDPR team, to request the name of the other Driver. Got this response:   Dear Mr. ---------   Our Ref: ----------   Thank you for your request which has been forwarded to the Data Protection Team for consideration.   The data you are requesting is third party, we would not give this information directly to you.   Your solicitor or legal team acting on our behalf would approach us directly with your signed (wet) consent allowing us to consider the request further.   I note the investigation is showing as ‘live’ at this time, we would not considered sharing data for suggested injury until the investigation has been closed.   If you wish to pursue a claim once the investigation has been closed please signpost your legal team to [email protected]   Kind regards   ----------------- Data Protection Assistant    
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest - Red Drving School


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4082 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Cag's

 

I will try to keep this brief but could do with a little crumb of comfort in our house tonight.

 

My wife applied for one of these driver instructor courses which was RED Driving School.

 

Below is a brief timeline.

 

  • Went to find about a driving instructor course in 2007, filled out some forms.
  • I then didn't take the course due medical reasons, the course was cancelled with Red in Wimbledon
  • One year later £179.00 was taken from my account, got in touch with RED and they agreed to take no more money
  • I heard no more untill 2011 when Capquest contacted me requestiing £7000 for a driving course not even taken
  • Capquest had taken a CCJ agaisnt me, so wrote to Capquest explaining the situation & received more threatning letters from Capquest
  • Applied to the court to have CCJ removed and case to heard at court
  • Went to Croydon County Court in November and judge was sympathetic towards my case and questioned Capquests conduct and advised to me to put in my own witness statement
  • Another date was set for 11th March 2013
  • This judge gave me 3 minutes of his time, did not listen to my point of view & told me it was my signature on the credit agreement and I was liable to pay all court cost's and interest over 5 years
  • Red Driving School have received this money, I did not not knowingly sign & credit agreement or receive any money or do the course

 

So what are our options now? Can't afford to pay this debt, don't think we should bearing mind we have not even had the course, not like we have had a car or something.

 

Think we have been very let down by the judge today.

 

Any help would be of a great help to us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you appeal the recent hearing? Did you submit a request for an extended time? Some judges sadly dont care about debtors and just want to rubber stamp the documents on as many forms as possible purely to get the max money in for the least work. The same happened to me years ago with 2 CCJ's.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you appeal the recent hearing? Did you submit a request for an extended time? Some judges sadly dont care about debtors and just want to rubber stamp the documents on as many forms as possible purely to get the max money in for the least work. The same happened to me years ago with 2 CCJ's.

 

Yes we did the extended time and took it to court, can we appeal the court judgment from today?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You entered into a contract and unless it was cancelled within 7 days or the time stated on the contract (if longer) you are liable to pay the full amount. Have you got a copy of the original agreement and what does it say about being unable to take the course due to ill health? Can you get anything in writing to support you were unfit at the time.? What was said in the phone call following the deduction of £179 a year later?

Did you submit a statement as instructed by the judge? Red Driving School may have been mistaken to pass this 'debt' onto Capquest. Did you not hear from Capquest before they got a CCJ against you?

 

You have a limited time to appeal this judgement so get that in and your case together. I think that only one payment was deducted from you a year after the event gives some credence that the company came to some kind of agreement with you. If you can show the call took place from a phone bill it may be you can argue there was an oral agreement not to proceed, if that was the case. Was there a time limit in which to take this course?

In CC cases the judges that hear the Case Management Directions are not necessarily the same ones that hear the final case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read that Red Driving School do not run their own courses. They contract you to a driving instructor company near to you and it may be the case that Red have had to pay this driving instructor company, even though you did not attend.

 

You need to appeal this and find out what costs Red did incur, as a result of the course being cancelled. I think you may be wise to get a solicitor to act for you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read that Red Driving School do not run their own courses. They contract you to a driving instructor company near to you and it may be the case that Red have had to pay this driving instructor company, even though you did not attend.

 

You need to appeal this and find out what costs Red did incur, as a result of the course being cancelled. I think you may be wise to get a solicitor to act for you.

 

How much and how do we appeal?

 

Is there a means test to say how much my wife can pay, if not successful?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a lot of unanswered questions in the background to this case such as how did you end up with a CCJ in the first place without defending it? Did you put a schedule of income and outgoings this time around for the court to consider? Section 52 of the CPR (Civil Procedure Rules)on the ministry of Justice website deals with appeals but you would definitely benefit from speaking to a lawyer and may get help through Citizens advice. You do have to put your appeal in fairly promptly. It is possible now that having failed to overturn the CCJ the Capquest may go back to court to get an enforcement order against you and at this time you can put in a schedule of your income and outgoings for consideration and an offer to pay in instalments. You should have supporting evidence for your income/outgoing schedule for the judge to consider. You can make 'instalment payments' into the court and then when Capquest go for an enforcement order these will be deducted from any order the court should make but it does indicate a desire to comply with the order and may make the judge more include to issue an instalment order. You can't appeal just to get an instalment order and as I understand it, in an appeal if you have already made any payments into the court this cannot be mentioned in the appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many Thanks

 

When my wife got the CCJ she gave it to me where I paid £80 to have it set aside, in those forms we put down her income, around £250-£300 per month. Capquest then provided loads of letters which they claim to have sent her making various offers to pay the debt (we never never seen them at all until copies provided). That's when we got the CCJ. The debt is 6 years old in June does that help her in any way?

 

What type of enforcement action could they take?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 6 years makes no odds, as they have a CCJ.

 

If you want to fight this, then see a Solicitor. They charge about £175 per hour, but you may get a free half hour consultation to see whether it is worth challenging the CCJ or not. Sometimes Solicitors are available at CAB.

 

If you don't want to fight this for whatever reasons, then you will have to enter into repayment. Make an offer of repayment of x per month. If they reject it, then you can ask the court to set the repayments. If you don't make payments, they can then instruct bailiffs or even upgrade to HCEO's for a debt that is over £600.

 

http://www.trustonline.org.uk/understand-judgments-fines/enforcing-judgments

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this for online help. It is a new government online legal advice service.

 

https://claonlineadvice.justice.gov.uk/

 

If you do a Google search for community legal advice, you may find a legal advice centre near to you. You may even get some help with how to appeal.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The six years doesn't help you here. Capquest is a debt recovery company and it would appear that they have been sold your debt by Red Driving School. Your debt was incurred in 2007 and Capquest took action for recovery in 2011. The six years statute barred rule is if not action whatsoever has been taken to recover the debt for that time but as you will see from many postings on consumer forum that debt recovery companies will still try to bully people into paying the debt and through subterfuge have even managed to get court orders issued after the statute bar. This is a common complaint where people are saying they never received anything from the company in relation to the debt but in the case if it going to court it is the court's responsibility to send out documents to you when a claim is lodged for you to respond to. If you have moved since the contract was signed for the Red Driving Course then that could be the answer. If not check with the court for where they claim they sent the papers to you in relation to responding to the initial claim, court directions and advising of court dates. Request a copy of the original Capquest claim you are entitled to have it. It's not just the Capquest paperwork that has gone astray here it is all the communication from the court. If Capquest provided the wrong contact details to the court you may have another appeal point here. I doubt the court will accept that all their paperwork went astray too. It is considered to be your responsibility to advise on change of addresses to your creditors however if following your phone calls with Red following your illness you understood the matter to be closed. Oral agreements, if you can show the balance of probability was what you said in your discussion with Red Driving School was what happened then this matter shouldn't be being pursued. That is why I suggested if you could find an itemised phone bill around the time you claim the call was made to Red advising them of your illness and that you wouldn't be able to attend the course and they agreed to that there is no other evidence to refute. I believe it would require a witness statement from someone in Red who dealt with the matter to say otherwise. Also I asked what the contract says about illness if you are physically unable to take the course due to illness. A letter from your doctor to say that you were ill at this time and unfit to undertake this course would be helpful if you visited them and/or your employer if you were off work at the same time. These are all matters which the court has not heard and so can be appeal points. I don't know your case well enough but I would start with the contract to see what provision it made for being unable to take the course through ill health. I would also ask the court to check the address which was given presumably by Capquest as your address for paperwork and was anything sent out registered post. If the wrong address or an old address is on the original CCJ paperwork that would be another point for appeal. If an old address then you could argue that you had no obligation to notify Red Driving School as they had agreed to you cancel the contract when you contacted them. That they only took one payment from you bank account lends support to this. If you haven't changed address then I cannot think of why you received nothing from either Capquest or the Court and I doubt a court would on the balance of probability believe that you didn't receive letters from either source but just in case I might check with the post office to see if they had any complaints of mail not being delivered in your neighbourhood at the time. It has been known for the odd rogue postman to dump letters rather than deliver them rare but it can happen. Is there the possibility due to illness you couldn't cope and didn't open them which might be an explanation but not one a court I believe would be sympathetic with unless the illness had been very serious.

 

Once a CCJ has been issued if the monies are not forthcoming Capquest can return to court for an enforcement order. Usually this would be for the order to be enforced by court bailiffs who would look to recover the debt. There are different enforcement orders which include putting a charge on your property if there is equity in it and forcing a sale or coming to your vehicle or other possession to the value of the debt. You should be notified of this event so you can put your offer forward if this happens but given you haven't anything upto now, I would send a registered letter to the court to be put on file with your full contact details advising that in this eventuality you wish to be notified of the hearing so you may attend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will see if we can get a solicitor but as you say expensive.

 

If she only gets around £250-£300 a month what would be a reasonable repayment offer, or just make an offer and see if they accept? I don't think there is anything worth 7k plus in the house. we have car worth about 5k but I am thinking off putting that in my name.

 

I understand that they can put a charge on the house and take the money when it's sold? Is that an offer we can make.

 

My wife and I are not together at this moment so the money she gets is important to her for food and clothes etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can show on the balance or probabilities that Red agreed orally to the cancellation of this contract then it follows that they were mistaken in selling the debt onwards to Capquest as it is not owed and it is a matter for Capquest to take up with them. A point for appeal can be evidence that the court has not seen or heard. Again see S52 CPR guidance on the MOJ site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will see if we can get a solicitor but as you say expensive.

 

If she only gets around £250-£300 a month what would be a reasonable repayment offer, or just make an offer and see if they accept? I don't think there is anything worth 7k plus in the house. we have car worth about 5k but I am thinking off putting that in my name.

 

I understand that they can put a charge on the house and take the money when it's sold? Is that an offer we can make.

 

My wife and I are not together at this moment so the money she gets is important to her for food and clothes etc.

 

Why not see whether Community Legal Advice can help or not. There are many legal advice centres around the country. It might not cost too much to make an appeal. I believe that the amount claimed by CapQuest should have been disputed, as Red driving school would not have made a loss for whole cost of the course. This should have been defended at the time, by asking Red to account for their losses by providing paperwork to confirm their actual losses.

 

She needs to get legal advice, otherwise I can see CapQuest going back to court and you will have bailiffs at the door. If there is a car on the driveway, they will apply a levy on it and argue about ownership afterwards.

 

I understand that your current position is difficult with separation, but if this is not dealt with now, it will only get worse.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't put a charge on you house for when you sell it, they will force a sale not wait to you want to sell and it may mean that you will not get the full market value for it. On enforcement they realise they may not get the full debt but they want as much as they can get. Transferring assets into someone else's name is a common tactic but one the court is very much alert to and one they would take a very dim view of. ie The bailiffs will probably take the car whether it's in your name or her name. There will be a record or registered owners at DVLA. The court would want to see a proper account of income and outgoings for you to come up with a reasonable amount. The income seems low but to do this exercise properly I believe would have to show joint income and outgoings. ie Utilities, credit card payments, car payments, council tax, fares to and from work etc and from what is left make a reasonable offer this is where CAB and you community legal advice will be able to help as well as with your appeal. Don't look at worse case scenario here because if you can make a reasonable offer which is supported by evidence the court will be looking for ways to make instalment payments work without recourse to the more drastic means of recovery. The offer shouldn't be a guesstimate of what they might accept it needs to be worked out on what you can reasonably afford.

 

I agree with Uncle Bulgaria you should go and get advice to help you prepare properly to get your payment options considered and for advice on appealing against the decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They won't force the sale of a house. The charge is put on the house and you may have to enter into a repayment arrangement. If you then don't make the repayments, they may apply to the court for the house to be sold, but this is very unlikely.

 

The chances are that the first option will be bailiffs and if that does not work, they will go back to the court for other options.

 

Anyway, just make sure that she obtains legal advice urgently and that an appeal is entered or an affordable repayment offer is made

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...