Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • oh well i wonder what new fake documents they have made up then...for them to try this.... just to check nothing funky like Link have filed an n244 to lift the stay and strike out her defence....she hasnt moved since last court comms has she?   is this an n24? bit unusual for a 13mts stay to just be lifted... has she not received anything from link/kearns in the last fw weeks like a docs bundle? bit like this thread... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466576-lc-assetlinkkearns-claim-form-2-mbna-cc/?do=findComment&comment=5256397  
    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sillygirls thread


worried33
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4097 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you dont have children living with you I dont think you would be awarded council tax benefit on a 18k salary, housing benefit (unless the rules are different in london) I think also would be denied. I may be wrong tho as especially I dont know your full circumstances.

 

18k has take home pay of £1231 per month thats after both NI and income tax deductions.

 

I sympathise with you on the 3 month contract but find it hard to sympathise on the turning down based on wage. Before I got ill I never refused a job because I thought I would be worst off financially.

 

Think of what you got offered compared to others, we had a court case yesterday where a lady was forced to work at poundland for nothing 30 hours a week whilst you got offered a 3 month contract paying out over 1.2k a month net.

 

I hope this is down to you misunderstanding the monthly take home pay and thinking it was much lower.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Council tax round here is £1800 a month - as I would not be getting any benefit because I would be working my effective 'personal spending money' would be about £35 a week for clothing etc etc - thank you for suggesting I should work as a slave for that. It wouldn't pay for lunches during the week, let alone anything else.

 

I have studied hard to get to the level I got to at work, gained skills and experience in dealing with volatile situations and people and you want me to go back to the beginning just because 'it is a job and you are unemployed'.

 

As for working for nothing, I do volunteer work two days a week, I am also working on getting my own business going WITHOUT ANY FUNDING WHATSOEVER as none is available once you get over a particular age (I am 55).

 

What I was offered was a pittance for travelling for 2 1/2 hours each way each day for 5 days, having to get up at 5.30 to make sure you got there on time, change trains twice and not be home until 8pm - if the money had been more I would have taken the job, but not for the basic salary it offered. 40 minutes travelling time is considered reasonable travelling time by the DWP in London so again it was a blatant breach of the Jobseekers agreement they made me sign.

 

If anyone thinks I am not taking jobhunting seriously I am more than willing to send them all the jobs I have applied for, cover letters as well.

Edited by sillygirl1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Council tax round here is £1800 a month - as I would not be getting any benefit because I would be working my effective 'personal spending money' would be about £35 a week for clothing etc etc - thank you for suggesting I should work as a slave for that. It wouldn't pay for lunches during the week, let alone anything else.

 

I have studied hard to get to the level I got to at work, gained skills and experience in dealing with volatile situations and people and you want me to go back to the beginning just because 'it is a job and you are unemployed'.

 

As for working for nothing, I do volunteer work two days a week, I am also working on getting my own business going WITHOUT ANY FUNDING WHATSOEVER as none is available once you get over a particular age (I am 55).

 

What I was offered was a pittance for travelling for 2 1/2 hours each way each day for 5 days, having to get up at 5.30 to make sure you got there on time, change trains twice and not be home until 8pm - if the money had been more I would have taken the job, but not for the basic salary it offered. 40 minutes travelling time is considered reasonable travelling time by the DWP in London so again it was a blatant breach of the Jobseekers agreement they made me sign.

 

If anyone thinks I am not taking jobhunting seriously I am more than willing to send them all the jobs I have applied for, cover letters as well.

In terms of your business, do you believe that your WP Provider provided superior capability than, say, a Professional Business Advisor working within the Business Link Network outside of the Work Programme?

 

When you announced your interest in self employment, did the WP Provider fast track you to the "Register Your Business" stage without any thought of developing a business plan, without any assistance towards developing a Marketing Strategy, and any assistance towards building a Client Base? And did the Clerk within the WP Provider suggest that, irrespective of how many hours you worked per week, provided that you could create the impression of working for 30 hours per week, you could claim Working Tax Credit.

 

This latter issue is important - if any erstwhile Self Employed person is audited by HMRC, if it can not be proven that each and every hour which was claimed for Working Tax Credit was not related to an activity where it was expected that you would be paid, then the claimant will be liable for repayment of any Working Tax Credit, and more than likely subject to a Benefit Fraud investigation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I was first made redundant I stated that I wanted to go self employed but it fell on deaf ears - the jobcentre were hellbent on getting me onto the Work Programme.

 

I was herded into an office where they went through who we were, what we did, what we want to do, it was at that point they realised I already had pre-empted them and done a bottom line budget sheet, and a business plan. The guy we had was only available for an hour each month, and his time was divided between 4 centres, so trying to get hold of him in between was a nightmare.

 

My idea (then, its changed a bit since) was to do a sewing service, and earn about £120 a week on a good week - but without the proper premises and equipment the funders did not want to know. I was told to contact HMRC as I would be eligible for WTC, so I did and was told I was NOT eligible as I was probably better off looking at early retirement!

 

I think I still have the projection the guy did for me around, it said I would get about £55 a week on WTC on top of what I could earn.

 

Another problem has been getting a business bank account to 'prove' that you are doing business, and of course trying to get trade accounts with suppliers - that is another story.

 

I've asked the moderators to make this post and the previous posts into a new thread.

 

I forgot to mention I've done two courses to further my experience, it was 8 years since I last did a certified course, so I now have two Level 2 courses, one in Ethnicity and Diversity and the other in Customer Services. I am filling in the paperwork for a Level 2 IT course. Level 2 courses are mostly free. There was no point doing an admin course as I already have NVQ Level 3 Admin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Council tax round here is £1800 a month - as I would not be getting any benefit because I would be working my effective 'personal spending money' would be about £35 a week for clothing etc etc - thank you for suggesting I should work as a slave for that. It wouldn't pay for lunches during the week, let alone anything else.

 

I have studied hard to get to the level I got to at work, gained skills and experience in dealing with volatile situations and people and you want me to go back to the beginning just because 'it is a job and you are unemployed'.

 

As for working for nothing, I do volunteer work two days a week, I am also working on getting my own business going WITHOUT ANY FUNDING WHATSOEVER as none is available once you get over a particular age (I am 55).

 

What I was offered was a pittance for travelling for 2 1/2 hours each way each day for 5 days, having to get up at 5.30 to make sure you got there on time, change trains twice and not be home until 8pm - if the money had been more I would have taken the job, but not for the basic salary it offered. 40 minutes travelling time is considered reasonable travelling time by the DWP in London so again it was a blatant breach of the Jobseekers agreement they made me sign.

 

If anyone thinks I am not taking jobhunting seriously I am more than willing to send them all the jobs I have applied for, cover letters as well.

 

I never said you wasnt just that I think you are in the trap because your previous job was extremely well paid you will find it hard to accept a lower paid job, because you worked your way up to that salary and may have a lifestyle accustomed to that salary. I also dont know your full circumstances so it would be wrong to make any assumptions about you.

 

eg. for me 18k is more than my highest ever paid job, its a huge wage compared to what I am used to. Since i am now used to living on sickness benefit if I ever had 18k per year it would be like winning the lottery with the spare cash I would have.

 

Now you have completely lost me on the £1800 a month council tax, I have never heard of a resident paying that level of council tax, maybe if they in a mansion. You sure you dont mean £1800 a year?

 

http://www.katybairstow.com/2010/03/comparing-london-borough-council-tax-rates/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I meant 1800 a year, brain not working properly today - think I have a cold coming.

 

18K in London is considered a 'starter' salary, ie no skills, experience, qualifications.

 

I don't have a lavish lifestyle, I don't have Sky TV, fancy clothes, holidays or anything like that.

 

I am not in a trap, I left the debt trap a long time ago. I saw redundancy coming from a long way off so was able to plan accordingly. The only thing that did not work is getting temp work - I used to temp a lot. Gone now are the days when people went on holiday you automatically got somebody in to cover the work, same if somebody goes off sick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok I respect it wont be mentally rewarding as you have had previously a much higher salary.

 

But I am struggling to see how that salary makes you worse off than JSA + housing benefit. Especially with the upcoming council tax benefit cuts.

 

Best of luck in whatever decision you make but I do suggest you do the maths again as I think you have got it wrong on that you wont be any better off, here is how I calculated net pay.

 

http://www.listentotaxman.com/index.php

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...