Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employer gave one weeks notice + more


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4087 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all

 

I won't go fully into this but I need a little advice about the company that I work for, I am a cleaner and had 4 jobs with them, recently we have had a few problems with a couple of the jobs we do (nothing major) because the problems came all at once our employer constantly kept calling us an basically threatened to remove us out of one of our jobs because they thought we where taking on too much (we don't even work full time 6hr a night).

 

After about a week another problem arose (which was at a job that previously had very little issues) this problem was not major, we had basically missed a request to do something one night (which was not due to be done anyway that night on our schedule) and they had called in to complain.

 

The company called us (while working at another job) 3 times and ultimately gave us one weeks notice and took the contract off us, they have given us no verbal warnings, no written warnings, no notice in writing (just over the phone). Also this job was not the one they originally threatened to take us out off a couple of weeks beforehand.

 

We have been working for them for 2 years 4 months and from my understanding they should give us 2 weeks notice and not one, also should they not have tried to resolve the issue and take us down some formal route of disciplinary action before they took the contract away from us.

 

It is causing a lot of stress we have a family and house and the drop in wages is going to be a real strain until we can find something else, they are also being so horrible to us they way they are speaking to us when dealing with anything that we have resorted to sending emails so that we have very little phone contact with them.

 

Does anyone know if we have a case for unfair dismissal from this job? plus the issue of just the one weeks notice, as we already have three other jobs still with this company can they make our life's miserable if we do decide to do something about what they have done? (if we can of course)

 

Would appreciate anyone's input on this as I don't know where to start, I don't want them to get away with treating people like this as it isn't the first time they have treated their staff like this.

 

Thanks

Edited by hazyeyes
Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you an employee or self employed, are you on a fixed hours/jobs contract?

 

Hi.

 

We are employee's we have a contract of employment, the jobs are on fixed hours the one they have taken away from us was 2hr 15 minutes a night (5 days a week).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Can anyone advise on this as things are getting worse, we feel they are trying to push us out of work, we had a weeks holiday last week went back monday and on the tuesday they where calling us about something that could of easily happened when we where away on holiday.. I feel victimised they have called today and requested a meeting with us both in the office and I am scared that they may sack us, can they legally do this??

Link to post
Share on other sites

We need more detail. I am a little confused about who the "company" is here. What do you mean when you say you have four jobs with them? And what do you mean when you say they gave you "one weeks notice and took the contract off us"? How does your relationship with the company actually work.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We need more detail. I am a little confused about who the "company" is here. What do you mean when you say you have four jobs with them? And what do you mean when you say they gave you "one weeks notice and took the contract off us"? How does your relationship with the company actually work.

 

Let me try to be more clear, we are cleaners, we do more than one place each night, but we are as a whole employed by ONE company who are making our lives miserable at the moment!

 

We have signed a contract of employment and it states in this that its two weeks notice and they gave us one weeks notice, there had been NO problems up at the job beforehand no verbal or written warnings at all they just gave us one week and took us out the job.

 

Is there anything else that isn't clear?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have i got this right you are employed by company A, they send their employees out to do diferent cleaning jobs for different clients? one of the clients is unhappy and said he dosent want youy anymore? so now the company A dont send you there and you only visit 3 instead of 4 clients?. I would assume that the 2 weeks notice is from your employer (*A) if he is terminating you contract and not from the client who no longer wants you? Does your contract with your emplopyer (A) state a number of hours to be worked per week? or is it just however many clients he has to send you to, so it could be 1, 2 or 10?

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like they are giving you notice of an alteration of hours not termination of employment. You can reject that but under the circumstances I would then expect to be managed out on performance grounds soon after.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have i got this right you are employed by company A, they send their employees out to do diferent cleaning jobs for different clients? one of the clients is unhappy and said he dosent want youy anymore? so now the company A dont send you there and you only visit 3 instead of 4 clients?. I would assume that the 2 weeks notice is from your employer (*A) if he is terminating you contract and not from the client who no longer wants you? Does your contract with your emplopyer (A) state a number of hours to be worked per week? or is it just however many clients he has to send you to, so it could be 1, 2 or 10?

 

You are right on the first part, however the client didn't ask for us to be removed the company removed us without warning.

 

The two weeks notice is from our employer yes, its does not state a number of hours in our contract nor how many clients we are sent out to clean for.

 

It sounds like they are giving you notice of an alteration of hours not termination of employment. You can reject that but under the circumstances I would then expect to be managed out on performance grounds soon after.

 

How is that alteration of hours, they have specfically removed us from a job with no good reason, without warning nothing, our performance on the job has been fine on all our jobs (apart from the odd issue here and there that any cleaner gets as we are human and not robots)

 

I really cannot see how they can do this, they have been harrssing us via phone for weeks, bringing up issues with all our job when they have specifcally gone in and had a look around not taking into account that certain aspects of all jobs are done on a weekly/monthly basis and not daily, they have not supplied us with site files until we have asked and asked to make sure we are actually doing the jobs as they are supposed to be, we have been cleaning blind basically for months on one of them.

 

We are not happy being treated the way we are, we work for another cleaning firm and they are extremely happy with our work never have any complaints speak very highly of us all around, this company just basically has it in for us it seems!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not removing all your work just some of it. So its a change of hours. You can rant at me all you like but unless you can make it any clearer, that is what they are doing! I'd get work off the other firm who are happy with you to replace the hjpurs then.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok your employer may have been the one to take you off a particular contract but that was because either he or the client were not happy with the work, I suspect it was the client in which case if that job is not there for you it isnt there. If you work for another firm as well ask them for more work to make up for the hrs you have lost or ask your firm if they have any more jobs

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...