Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Barclay Card conditions is complete. There was only 3 pages. This had old address on. Full CCA. 15 pages. The only personal info is my name and address. Current Address The rest just like a generic document.  Barclays CCA 260424.pdf
    • An update to this case as I’ve not been on in a while.    I am still awaiting a charging decision in the case. The two police officers involved have said their personal belief is a section 47 ABH charge is the most likely outcome but this isn’t a sure thing of course.    The EA certificate from the issuing court has now lapsed. The court have refused to recertify him until they’ve had a hearing in to the case, and the district judge has issued orders to surrender all evidence, footage, photos etc.    I have done so promptly.    the EA, not so much . Equita have claimed they cannot provide his bodycam footage as the camera he was wearing is the EA personal one not one of theirs.   the EA has claimed he has asked Equita and the police for the footage as he claims he doesn’t have it.    the police have confirmed they didn’t seize his camera and they don’t have it.    so they are basically pointing the finger at each other all the while failing to comply with the district judges order to provide all evidence they intend to rely on at the rescheduled hearing.    The district judge has stated the hearing for his certification will NOT be the hearing for my complaint as there is no charge as of yet, and just as to whether he should be recertified or not.    I’m not 100% on why that can’t be done at the time, but I’m not about to question a judge…..      
    • Thanks FTMDave, I like the cut of your jib - I'll go with that and obtain proof of postage. Encouraging that NPE have never followed through and seem to blowing hot air, let's see where they go after this   Regards
    • Please see my comments in orange within your post.
    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JD Williams, reclaiming Admin Charges. What next?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4032 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks,

I'm hoping some kind soul will point me in the right direction for my next move.

I have had an account with JD Williams for at least 7 or 8 years now.

Last year, I got fed up with all the 'Admin charges' that were placed on the account, so I wrote asking for a summary of all transactions. Oxendales duly did so and I was shocked to find the charges over the years totalled beyond £700.

(I do accept, and do not want to get into the argument that I should have simply not made my payments late. There were extenuating circumstances, including living abroad with the RAF which complicated getting payment on time. I did, at the time, explain this to JD Williams but received no sympathy).

Anyhow, I wrote to them, requesting a refund for the charges and received the standard 'get knotted' letter.

So I moved on to the next stage, by writing and suggesting that, should they not comply, I would consider taking them to court.

I heard nothing for two months, and then, last week, I received a letter from 'Oxendales' 'Without Prejudice' which stated, amongst a lot of waffle about whether the charges constitute penalties, that they are still not willing to refund the charges.

Furthermore, they have now removed the credit limit for my account although, naturally, they are quite willing for me to use their company as a cash account. I looked at my account today:

The 'available to spend' is now a minus figure

The balance is the full amount due

The credit limit is £0

So I am now confused.

Do I have any more actions I can take? Do I have to go down the Court route? Is this likely to cost me anything excessive if |I do not succeed? And can someone please advise me, preferably with links to any suitable templates?

This is for an amount in excess of £700 so I'd rather not let it lie, unless I'm at greater risk of it rebounding on me.

Thanks in advance for your advice.

19/08/2006 Request for statements sent, with £10 cheque.

26/08/2006 Statements received - cheque returned

05/09/2006 - Preliminary Request for £1153.50 sent by Recorded Delivery - NO RESPONSE

21/09/2006 - LBA Sent by Recorded Delivery

27/09/2006 - Letter received from HSBC offering a "full and final settlement" of £1040.00

28/09/2006 - Rejection of settlement offer sent by Recorded Delivery

04/10/2006 - Offer of settlement IN FULL from HSBC :smile:

 

*~~Thank You to Everyone for the Wonderful Advice~**

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I'd still be grateful for any advice, thanks.

19/08/2006 Request for statements sent, with £10 cheque.

26/08/2006 Statements received - cheque returned

05/09/2006 - Preliminary Request for £1153.50 sent by Recorded Delivery - NO RESPONSE

21/09/2006 - LBA Sent by Recorded Delivery

27/09/2006 - Letter received from HSBC offering a "full and final settlement" of £1040.00

28/09/2006 - Rejection of settlement offer sent by Recorded Delivery

04/10/2006 - Offer of settlement IN FULL from HSBC :smile:

 

*~~Thank You to Everyone for the Wonderful Advice~**

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Sorry you were missed.

 

If they have not refunded the charges then it looks like you may well have to issue against them.

 

You say you have a list of ALL the charges levied to the account....does that comprise a list of each charge, the amount, what it was for and the date it was applied to the account?

 

Have you done a spreadsheet with the interest calculations on it so that you now exactly what amount you are claiming for?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for getting back.

I have all the statements with all transactions including admin charges.

So what is the next stage in the process, please?

Much appreciated

19/08/2006 Request for statements sent, with £10 cheque.

26/08/2006 Statements received - cheque returned

05/09/2006 - Preliminary Request for £1153.50 sent by Recorded Delivery - NO RESPONSE

21/09/2006 - LBA Sent by Recorded Delivery

27/09/2006 - Letter received from HSBC offering a "full and final settlement" of £1040.00

28/09/2006 - Rejection of settlement offer sent by Recorded Delivery

04/10/2006 - Offer of settlement IN FULL from HSBC :smile:

 

*~~Thank You to Everyone for the Wonderful Advice~**

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complete this spreadsheet in accordance with the instructions in the "Notes" tab.

 

When you have done that you will need to write to the company again with a formal Letter Before Action which we can help you with. Get the spreadsheet done first though and let us know the amount it comes up with.

 

CISheet v101.xls

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much

19/08/2006 Request for statements sent, with £10 cheque.

26/08/2006 Statements received - cheque returned

05/09/2006 - Preliminary Request for £1153.50 sent by Recorded Delivery - NO RESPONSE

21/09/2006 - LBA Sent by Recorded Delivery

27/09/2006 - Letter received from HSBC offering a "full and final settlement" of £1040.00

28/09/2006 - Rejection of settlement offer sent by Recorded Delivery

04/10/2006 - Offer of settlement IN FULL from HSBC :smile:

 

*~~Thank You to Everyone for the Wonderful Advice~**

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...