Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4146 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

when i signed for the first time at Ingeus the other day they took my job search diary off me, i got told its to check if i have done enough. does this mean they'll contact every the employer of every job i apply for and write on the diary? :S

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

when i signed for the first time at Ingeus the other day they took my job search diary off me, i got told its to check if i have done enough. does this mean they'll contact every the employer of every job i apply for and write on the diary? :S

Whereas you may show your Job Search Diary, there is no specific legislative enabler which requires you to provide contact details of any employer, nor for any Clerk within Ingeus to follow up on any application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whereas you may show your Job Search Diary, there is no specific legislative enabler which requires you to provide contact details of any employer, nor for any Clerk within Ingeus to follow up on any application.

 

they were jobcentre staff but they sign people on the WP in Ingeus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no the diaries are used to check that you have taken enough steps each week to confirm that you are entitled to receive JSA as per your JSAg or Action Plan agreed by the work program.

 

ok thanks. i handed i 4 forms of vacancies i have aplied for, will that be enough?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I'm overdue an eye sight test but maybe I need to get around to it soonish. Completely misread the thread title as 'skiing while on the work programme' and thought that's an improvement in the courses available ... :madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know I'm overdue an eye sight test but maybe I need to get around to it soonish. Completely misread the thread title as 'skiing while on the work programme' and thought that's an improvement in the courses available ... :madgrin:

 

lmao haha ive just had a thought of everyone trying to ski round the ingeus office xD

Link to post
Share on other sites

no the diaries are used to check that you have taken enough steps each week to confirm that you are entitled to receive JSA as per your JSAg or Action Plan agreed by the work program.

 

Woah, hang on a minute. I'm slightly confused now (easily done:-D )

 

@Flumps: You're not saying a WP Action Plan can take precedence over a JSAg are you?

 

Last time I was at WP they mentioned writing to 100 employers per week 'on spec' in an action plan. I'm NEVER going to agree to any action plans set by WP because they really are ludicrous and although I'm not happy with my JSAg (no choice in that either) I do try my best to meet most of the requirements of it. JC want me to write to 10 per week and visit 5 per week 'on spec' as well. That's never going to happen (pointless!) but its a lot more reasonable (wrong word) than the WP's plans.

If JC start using WP action plans as the basis for activities required to be 'actively seeking work' and therefore 'entitled...', us unemployed on WP are well and truly *@#'ed :madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woah, hang on a minute. I'm slightly confused now (easily done:-D )

 

@Flumps: You're not saying a WP Action Plan can take precedence over a JSAg are you?

 

Last time I was at WP they mentioned writing to 100 employers per week 'on spec' in an action plan. I'm NEVER going to agree to any action plans set by WP because they really are ludicrous and although I'm not happy with my JSAg (no choice in that either) I do try my best to meet most of the requirements of it. JC want me to write to 10 per week and visit 5 per week 'on spec' as well. That's never going to happen (pointless!) but its a lot more reasonable (wrong word) than the WP's plans.

If JC start using WP action plans as the basis for activities required to be 'actively seeking work' and therefore 'entitled...', us unemployed on WP are well and truly *@#'ed :madgrin:

Contrary to any myth which others may believe in, the Job Seekers Agreement remains paramount, and candidates only have to attend the Work Programme until such time as the Job Seekers Agreement becomes invalid - say when a candidate secures employment, and signs off.

 

When candidates are assigned to the Work Programme, the handover meeting at Job Centre Plus develops an Action Plan for the candidate, which is then sent (together with personal data) to the pimp, together with a £400 attachment fee. However, although candidates may be required to attend meetings (if they dont, they will be liable for a sanction), and submit to Mandatory Activities, they are not required to sign any document (such as an Action Plan), drawn up by some poorly skilled and trained Welfare To Work Staffer.

Edited by RebeccaPidgeon
Additional Information Submitted
Link to post
Share on other sites

well ive just started the WP and last week was my first signing with them, as i mentioned in another thread they took my job search diary off me and i was told it was to see if i had done enough. i also heard one of the signing team mention that it had to reflect the full 4 weeks as you didn't have to sign over the christmas period.

i'm worried that i haven't done enough even though i handed in 4 forms of vacancies i have applied for, the 4th one was only half full plus they all were applied for through the internet.

 

will i face a sanction or am i worrying over nothing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, why are you giving the WP your job diary? You don't have to give them this at all, only give to the person when you actually sign on, let them sign it then done.

Have you signed all the forms on the first appointment, if so you need to withdraw your consent for sharing of data immediately.

Check out this web site: http://consent.me.uk/

 

George

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, why are you giving the WP your job diary? You don't have to give them this at all, only give to the person when you actually sign on, let them sign it then done.

Have you signed all the forms on the first appointment, if so you need to withdraw your consent for sharing of data immediately.

Check out this web site: http://consent.me.uk/

 

George

 

 

i signed a form allowing the provider to sent my c/v to other companies but i have since withdrew my consent. it wasn't the WP provider who took it it was jobcentre staff but since i'm on the WP ive got to sign at the providers instead of the jobcentre but ive been told the people signing are jobcentre staff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the signing team had decided that you didn't provide sufficent job search you would have been advised and further information would have been obtained either face to face or on an additional form and you would have been advised that a referral was going to be sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the signing team had decided that you didn't provide sufficent job search you would have been advised and further information would have been obtained either face to face or on an additional form and you would have been advised that a referral was going to be sent.

 

would they have given me the form there and then or would it be sent through the post? they didn't say anything to me about a referal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

does anyone know what happens at the ingeus confidence workshop so i know what to expect? you don't have to talk in front of the group do you?

I am sure that the course will be a valuable opportunity.... to plebs working within Deloitte-Ingeus, and who cannot present themselves well to a group.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure that the course will be a valuable opportunity.... to plebs working within Deloitte-Ingeus, and who cannot present themselves well to a group.

 

i'm not looking forward to it, will i have to speak in front of the group?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Joe, I never attended one whilst I was there but if my memory serves me correctly the workshop was more about methods and means of dealing with challenging situations.

 

If you would prefer not to speak then mention it to the person facilitating the group before you go in and don't worry about it. You may be asked to introduce yourself at the beginning but have a chat with the facilitator beforehand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...