Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Sorry  Noted x   Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GE Money Loan paid but have outstanding arrears account.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3974 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quick update,

I have been accepted for a loan with Zopa and expect the money to come through the beginning of next week.

 

 

Once it's in I'll send a cheque (it will be in my name) by special delivery.

 

Speaking to Jon888999 a while ago he said I should say it's paid without prejudice. Is there anything else I should include?

 

The letter will probably go something like this:

 

Dear GE Home Lending,

 

I have included a cheque to the value of £xxxx.xx to pay the settlement figure that was provided on your correspondence dated 07/02/2013.

I wish to make you aware that this is payed without prejudice.

 

As per your correspondence I expect to have my title deeds returned to me within 28 days of the payment being taken.

 

Many Thanks,

S

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going through the statements entering charges etc onto spreadsheet, has anyone come accross 'CAC Payment Auto' before?

It's a credit to the account. Now my father used to have a paying in book - could it be that?

S

 

edit -

just found an entry where 'CAC Payment Auto' credits the account with £150

then the next line 'Transfer cac payment' with a debit of £150.

Then an administration fee of £40.

 

I could understand this for a direct debit bouncing but not paying in cash.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have completed the spreadsheet which I have attached.

 

I hope I've filled it out correctly. I've gone through the statements and listed all debits from the account (excluding normal interest payments). Some may be lawful and I've highlighted these in red.

The interest rate of the account is 0.750% a month so I've put 9% as the APR.

 

The loan amount at the beginning was £11600 and £1600 was PPI, so you will see this is the first entry.

 

I will send cheque off now with letter I wrote a few posts ago.

 

Thanks

S

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can't put PPI on the same spready and thats not how you do PPI anything.

 

 

remove these

 

additional interest

 

nor the bottom 3 in red

 

i dont think you can sols fees if it HAS been to court that many times?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the legal fees should all be around the time of the court cases

if they are not

then becareful they could be spof

[seen this beforewith GE]

 

as for the other bit,

 

remove all entries for additional interest [unless it's to do with penalty fee interest]

 

and the three inred at the bottom of your sheet too

 

i dont believe any of those are reclaimable

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the additional interest is the interest that has come from the administration charges and other fees/costs.

I suppose this would be claimed back when the charges are reclaimed + interest.

 

Thanks dx.

S

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have revised the spreadsheet.

 

I have now removed -

Addition interest (this was the interest they added on that was amounted due to fines/charges etc)

Valuation fees x 2

Default notice charges x 3

Litigation referral fee x 1

Counselling visit x 1

Solicitor fee x 2 (one when suspended possession order was applied for, one just after suspended possession order was granted)

 

Also looking at the original credit agreement, the APR was infact 13.2% as per calculated by the loan analysis spreadsheet.

Does this look a more accurate representation?

 

S.

Edited by Sheila117
wrong interest rate.
Link to post
Share on other sites

DN you can include

councrlling you can include

prob referral lit too

val fees ,

if at the start then fair comment

but if not

i'd suspect those too put them in

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant include the ppi on this sheet

 

and thats not the way to do it

 

you need to put in the PPI inevery month

at the % of your PCM it was

 

on its own sheet

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant include the ppi on this sheet

 

and thats not the way to do it

 

you need to put in the PPI inevery month

at the % of your PCM it was

 

on its own sheet

 

dx

 

Hi , The PPI was added to the loan as a lump sum at the start, increasing the balance. It wasn't charged on a monthly basis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the PPI is 13.79% of the total loan amount £10,000 (loan) + £1600 (PPI).

 

The payments are all over the place (various times, various amounts).

Do I enter on the spreadsheet 13.79% of the payment made and the date?

 

i.e. Spreadsheet entries:

27/11/03 (Paid £100) £13.79

12/12/03 (Paid £50) £6.89

01/01/04 (Paid £150) £20.69

 

Sorry, I'm reading the PPI - Single Premium tutorial but can't get my head round it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , The PPI was added to the loan as a lump sum at the start, increasing the balance. It wasn't charged on a monthly basis.

 

yes it was read no.1. below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the PPI is 13.79% of the total loan amount £10,000 (loan) + £1600 (PPI).

 

The payments are all over the place (various times, various amounts).

Do I enter on the spreadsheet 13.79% of the payment made and the date?

 

i.e. Spreadsheet entries:

27/11/03 (Paid £100) £13.79

12/12/03 (Paid £50) £6.89

01/01/04 (Paid £150) £20.69

 

Sorry, I'm reading the PPI - Single Premium tutorial but can't get my head round it.

 

sounds ok i'll check it later

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably

unless you can identify they are charging int on the outstanding on a monthly basis.

i pers think it is comounded

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another 1hr30 of spreadsheet entering later -

 

Looking better?

Thanks,

S

 

edit: I have edited the spreadsheet, I hope the respective owner doesn't mind. Many thanks.

Edited by Sheila117
messed it up
Link to post
Share on other sites

take out fos in the other filename and it will attach properly

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...