Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Railway ticket: Student arrested using photocopy discount card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4138 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes thats the story.

He is a foreign student, studying in the UK.

He keeps a scanned copy of all their documents on the internet

- something I would advise other people to do when they travel abroad

 

When they arrived back in UK (they had passport, thats the only document they need), they had forgotten all of the other documents , and also house keys

 

They *own* a valid student discount card, which they are now in possession

 

If the story were wildly different , I wouldn't waste your (or my) time trying to seek help here

 

@honeybee - yes as you say it is essential to get opposing views/ look for chinks in the story, as a magistrate or jury might. But as well as a help forum, this is also here to *support consumers* in their actions. "Bang to rights" and "plead guilty" are not examples of helpful or supportive behaviour that one would expect to see in a forum such as this

 

 

What if the person has been caught "bang to rights", is going to be found guilty, so the best way for them to limit their punishment is to "plead guilty"?

In that case, absolutely the right advice is then "bang to rights" and "plead guilty" : there is no point in trying to waffle / make it more palatable if that is the best advice.

 

You can't ask for advice and then decide you only want posted the advice you prefer. Advice gets posted and you can choose what advice to take.

 

If you can't explain why you feel those terms don't apply, as long as the poster isn't using foul or abusive language : why shouldn't they post their opinion?. Just because it isn't the answer you wanted doesn't automatically make it

a) wrong, or

b) unhelpful.

 

You might disagree that it is "bang to rights" (but, you haven't yet explained why you disagree), and you might disagree that he should plead guilty (again, posting why you feel intent hasn't been established : in a previous post I asked if he'd been offered a Penalty Fare : see below).

 

I note that I pointed out that you getting the original Railcard sent to the UK was unlikely to influence things, and that you haven't noted any response to that, nor clarified many of the queries raised by myself or other posters.

 

This may limit the validity or utility of advice offered.

 

 

As a question for the industry experts:

Person A has a discounted (YP Railcard / Network Railcard / Senior/ HM Forces / Etc.) ticket, and the railcard isn't valid.

This makes the "discounted" ticket invalid.

 

If the member of rail staff feels this wasn't deliberate, can they:

a) issue an excess to correct the issue?

b) if an excess is appropriate, but the traveller doesn't have those funds on them, issue an UFN?

c) issue a PFN if in a PF area?.

 

I accept that if the member of staff feels this was deliberate that none of the above may be applicable, and a report should be made.

 

I also note that on this thread it wasn't "Report -> TOC letter -> TOC summons", but a charge by the police, and prosecution by CPS.

 

Thanks, BazzaS : (still learning as I go along).

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If, from the 'evidence' posted by a person seeking help on this and other forums, it is the considered opinion of those respondents who have knowledge of the law and processes relevant to the query in hand that the alleged offender is guilty and would be best advised to plead accordingly, it would be entirely wrong and misleading for the respondent to state otherwise.

 

All of the suggestions that have been aired on this forum are in reply to 'evidence' suggested by the original post

 

Having monitored this and the thread on another site, I think that the best possible suggestions for dealing with the matter have been given by those whose line of work this is.

 

It is essential that your friend seeks the advice of a qualified criminal defence lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be surprised if OP was the person arrested and charged with the offence anyway

 

OP only listening to advice they agree with

 

OP is Not telling the correct story IMO

 

If OP is seeking advice on another forum,let them get to the Truth out of the OP...

 

chillysnow posted on 21st January 2013 14:04

 

My friend is a foreign student studying at uni here. He left his documents in his home country at Christmas by accident, but always keeps copies here in UK - eg drivving licence , visa etc

 

chillysnow was 1st asked how did he get back into the UK on photo copies of passport/visa on 21st January 2013 16:08 but refused to Answer

 

 

But now the following story was posted at 09:09 23/01/2013

 

Yes thats the story.

He is a foreign student, studying in the UK.

He keeps a scanned copy of all their documents on the internet

- something I would advise other people to do when they travel abroad

 

When they arrived back in UK (they had passport, thats the only document they need), they had forgotten all of the other documents , and also house keys

 

They *own* a valid student discount card, which they are now in possession

 

If the story were wildly different , I wouldn't waste your (or my) time trying to seek help here

 

@honeybee - yes as you say it is essential to get opposing views/ look for chinks in the story, as a magistrate or jury might. But as well as a help forum, this is also here to *support consumers* in their actions. "Bang to rights" and "plead guilty" are not examples of helpful or supportive behaviour that one would expect to see in a forum such as this

 

 

 

Sorry but this thread has become a joke and complete waist of bloody time !

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not being rude or anything but as this story has unfolded, it is making less sense.

 

1- OPs friend travelled on Saturday with a photocopy & was caught. As the OP stated all documents Visa etc all left behind in another Country as per post on 21st.

 

Yet now according to the OP on 23rd '' They *own* a valid student discount card, which they are now in possession''

 

Blimey if only Royal Mail could deliver my mail just as quick as International mail.

 

This is apart from the question asked several times by 45002 regarding entry back into the UK, as OP went from stating ''all documents Visa etc all were left behind'' to now there being a Passport!

 

Sorry this simply doesn't add up & if we can see this, gawd only knows what the Met/BTP prosecution/CPS or Court will think. (sorry I'm lost myself as to whose involved in this)

I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every single minute of it!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you forget all documents apart from your passport? I could understand forgetting, say, one or two documents.

 

Other than helping to see if we are being given a clear and consistent account of events ("you can't build a house on quicksand"), I'm not sure the "why" of why the OP/their friend didn't have the original, only a copy, matters.

 

If they only had a copy, it wasn't valid for use, and the accompanying discounted ticket then was invalid.

 

The "why" goes only to mitigation, not finding of guilty or not guilty.

 

(In other cases it might become a factor in persuading a TOC not to prosecute, but in this case the TOC isn't making that decision, CPS is already proceeding)

 

Edited to add: it now appears the person charged is in the UK on a visa. This adds further weight to OC's advice to obtain professional legal advice, if the person charged might have their immigration status put at risk by a conviction .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be interesting to know if chillysnow is posting on another forum about the same subject ?

 

Is the same story been told "copy and paste" or a comply different story been told !

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be interesting to know if chillysnow is posting on another forum about the same subject ?

 

Is the same story been told "copy and paste" or a comply different story been told !

 

 

Yes, a remarkably similar story is posted on another forum and has had remarkably similar responses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...