Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who not only held their positions, but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
    • Santander have sent their final response and have agreed that they were in the wrong. They will be refunding me the amount I am due and £50 for the delay.  Just the interest factor would be more than double the £50 that they are offering. Thinking to just close this and move on. Is this what you would do?  Opened a FOS case on the 1st of June but haven't heard back yet. 
    • It just been delivered and ive had a live chat with p2g to get some proof of deliverey and they send me a picture of the parcel placed in a gas meter box which they class as a ' 'Safe Place'  and not placed into the hands of the buyer which is either a good thing as the buyer can claim he never received It so i can claim against p2g or a bad thing . Do p2g have coordinators when taking pictures and scanning of parcels ?  I know Royal Mail do ... I'm going to send the buyer a message and see what he says
    • Eight in ten voters support blocking bonuses for polluting water firm bosses INEWS.CO.UK Polling for i exposes level of public anger over sewage dumping  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UK cc debt in Spain


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

What action can DRC`s take.

 

I am resident in Spain for the last 10 years.

 

As a pensioner I have limited resources and no assets except my house in joint names with little equity due to the property crash.

 

No assets in england ( £20.00 in Bank and £10 PSB).

 

I was paying £1 pm on debt of £4300 to MBNA(ex Alliance & Leicester)

 

They have now reassigned this debt to a DRC.

 

What can they do?

 

I know they cant get a CCJ as I am out of Jurisdiction but can they try thru a Spanish court?

 

If so they do have to use UK law?

 

Otherwise I suppose they will try to get money out of me.

 

Is it worth offering, say £500, in Full and Final settlement,

 

I cant afford to pay monthly, a least not a meaningful amount.

 

Also MBNA wasn´t charging interest,

 

will the DRC start charging interest now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

been there 10yrs

 

no-one local ever told you they nor anyone can do anything to you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea depends how you read it :lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Up to you what you do. There is no reason why you cannot just continue to pay DRC the £1 per month that you have been paying and they can either take it or leave it. OR you decide to stop paying and see what happens. They could go for a European Enforcement Order, but if you dispute this, then they are back to trying to get a CCJ in the UK and then trying to get a Spanish court to enforce it. They can alternatively apply for your bankruptcy in the UK in your absence. It is for the latter reason that you might choose to pay £1 per month or at least offer this based on current affordability, as this might prove useful. If they refused to accept £1 per month, it should county against them if they tried to make you bankrupt.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re above. I understood from this site that as I am not resident in the UK(fiscally or physically) they cant go for a CCJ or Bankruptcy-am I right? I also thought to go for an European enforcement order they had to have a CCJ to enforce? Does anyone know if they actually send the collectors round to houses in the EU?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re above. I understood from this site that as I am not resident in the UK(fiscally or physically) they cant go for a CCJ or Bankruptcy-am I right? I also thought to go for an European enforcement order they had to have a CCJ to enforce? Does anyone know if they actually send the collectors round to houses in the EU?

 

No, they can go for bankruptcy in your absence, sending a statutory demand to your last known UK address. Although if they know your Spanish address they should really advise you of their intentions.

 

They can apply for a EEO where you are currently resident, but if this is disputed they are back to trying to enforce in the UK. They should not apply for a UK CCJ that you could not defend, but they may do so and then they could ask for a Spanish court to enforce.

 

In your situation, I think I would write to DRC letting them know of your poor financial position in Spain and that you would struggle to offer them £1 per month. At least then they could not say that you did not inform them of your situation.

 

I doubt that they would arrange for doorstep collectors to visit you in Spain and even if they did, they have no powers. I have heard of some debt owners passing the debt on to companies such intrum Justitia, who have offices in Spain, but I don't know to what extent they chase debts up.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they can go for bankruptcy in your absence, sending a statutory demand to your last known UK address. Although if they know your Spanish address they should really advise you of their intentions.
They can't if the OP has been out of the UK for three years or more.

 

There are some restrictions on you being

able to present a bankruptcy petition if a

debtor who lives abroad fails to comply with

a statutory demand:

 

• If the debtor lives in one of the member

states of the European Union (apart from

Denmark), you will not be able to present

a bankruptcy petition against that person

if they carry on business or earn their

living in that EU country.

 

• If the person is retired or unemployed, the

court will look at the place where they

normally live. You have to make the

person bankrupt under the law of the

country where they normally work or live.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?255040-Declaring-Bankruptcy-In-The-UK-If-You-Now-Live-Abroad(1-Viewing)-nbsp
Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't if the OP has been out of the UK for three years or more.

 

Ah ok. I overlooked there being any time limit. I think in the OP's case they should probably advise the debt company of their situation and that they have been resident in Spain for 10 years. At least then it might prevent them saying that they will enforce in ways that they cannot.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can a statutory demand be sent to an EU address if the OP has been out of the country for more than 3 years? If making SO bankrupt in, say Spain, under the laws of the country wont a person have to commit an act of bankruptcy in Spain or does a default in England count. Any way, at the speed the Spanish legal system works it would be years before this got thru even if uncontested and I would be dead or in a home by then.Perhaps an offer in full and final settlement would be in order. In view of my parlous financial situation if they refuse I can use this in any defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See pages 4 & 5

 

They would need to serve you with a SD & prove it had been served correctly; http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/pdfs/guidanceleafletspdf/statdemand.pdf

 

 

A statutory demand is not a document issued by the court. Leave to serve out of the jurisdiction is not therefore required. When a statutory demand is served outside the jurisdiction, the time limits for compliance (21 days) and for application to set aside (16 days) must be amended. This is done with reference to the Extra Jurisdiction Tables (Time for Acknowledgement of Service) in the Supreme Court Practice 1997, and the time is altered with reference to each particular country. [see Practice Direction (Bankruptcy: Service Abroad (No 1 of 1988 [1988] 1 WLR 461.]
Link to post
Share on other sites

In the vast majority of cases it is just not economically viable for them to pursue bankruptcy an EPO or even a EEO unless the debt is fairly substantial usually in the many tens if not hundreds of thousands. A creditor is not going to invest time, energy and money in expensive cross-border legal fees when there is no certainty that they will ever get the money back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That´s what I thought. However, on a point of interest, having read the link, it seems that action for Bankruptcy has to be taken in the member country(all others inc Denmark having a limitation of 3 years). The question then is would a default in one country be recognised as such by another? Any way I read it as a statutory declaration cannot be made in UK but that the foreign courts proceedures must be followed (with whatever the equivalent of a SD is). The question is does anyone actually know if other EU courts

would recognise a foreign debt as grounds for Bankruptcy. I suppose one way they could do it would be to sell the debt to a Co in that country and take action from there, however I am sure that this would be easy to challenge.

Thanks for all the advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

The UK bankruptcy laws are archaic and an application can be made for BR for a debt over £750 although this is being considered to be increased.

 

If a creditor was to apply for your BR in another EU state they would have to do so within the legislation of that country.

 

Have you sent MBNA a SAR to see exactly what charges they've added & was there any PPI? If so both can be reclaimed + statutory interest which could considerably reduce the alleged debt.

 

Also I seem to remember that there was some problem with MBNA being able to produce the CCAs from the A&L a/cs, if that's the case they would not be able to bring any action & you could defend any BR application on that basis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...