Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 2nd class stamp only , get free proof of posting from any PO counter dx  
    • Hi,  It has been a long time but I have had confirmation claim will proceed to hearing in roughly 1 months time.  I was wondering if anyone could advise on defence please.  A few questions I have are: 1) I didn't notify VCS that I was not the driver of the vehicle and the judge may look negatively on this point.  I did not receive any direction in correspondence from VCS  that I should inform them if I was not the driver and that was going to be the foundation for may argument on this point. 2) The vehicle is stopped at a zebra crossing.  Based on the images from VCS for around 10 seconds.  At that time there is someone standing near the zebra crossing and someone else enters my vehicle.  I was going to raise the point that stopping at a zebra crossing when someone is standing near it is to be expected.  I was also going to ask the question how you can have a no stopping zone when there are zebra crossings where the driver is required to stop. 3) The no stopping zone is clearly signposted, however, no drop off or pickup is not clearly signposted with one small sign at the zebra crossing, parallel to the road and on the passengers side.  I was going to challenge that no-drop off or pickup is clearly signposted.  4) VCS mentioned my initial defence was generic and clearly copied from the internet.  It covered 1) Claimant not being in a position to state if the Defendant was the driver at the time.  2) No evidence that claimant's contract with landowner supersedes byelaws & signage isn't legally binding contract. 3) No contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on speculative charge. I am interested to know if anyone has had success or been unsuccessful with this 'generic' defence. 5) If I should submit an updated defence to the court based on questions 1, 2 & 3.  Or if it is better to only raise these points in court? Thanks.  Any guidance would be appreciated  
    • I honestly don't know, Baz. In addition what I don't  understand (from that pamphlet) is this: The s88 criteria are quite clear and don't need a medical professional to interpret them . The one most relevant to his topic says that an application is not a "qualifying application" if a relevant disability has been declared. The problem with the word "may" is how does the applicant establish whether me "may" driver under s88 when he has not complied with its conditions? I don't know the answer to that either. But to further muddy the waters, the pamphlet says this (about : But the s88 statute says absolutely nothing like that at all. It simply says that if you have declared a relevant disability s88 does not apply. The DVLA pamphlet is simply confusing as far as I can see. That's actually my opinion and that's what I would stick to if it was me making the application. But I'll seek a few opinions from others over the next couple of days.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

fit note date for reclaiming esa after esa tribunal failure


donkeyhoaty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I am new to this site so please forgive me if im posting in the wrong place.

 

Im permanently disabled and was found unfit for work from the Occy Health Doctor at my work place.

 

i claimed esa (contributions based) then went for a medical in December 2011.

 

I only achieved 6 points so i appealed immediately.

 

My ESA was stopped in July 2012 as i had received 365 days of benefit and cant claim for Income based ESA as my husband works full time.

i have been without any money at all for that time.

 

I had my ESA tribunal appeal December 2012 where the judge said my medical was on January 9th 2012 but it wasnt

and i only remembered this when i checked my old diary at home.

 

ive just recieved notification from the tribunal that i have failed this as well.

 

one of the reasons was that i spend all day alone as my husband works full time !!!!!!

 

i understand that i have to reclaim esa as my conditions have worsened and i am in no way fit for work (covered by fit notes),

 

please would anyone be able to tell me when i should claim from and more importantly what dates do the fit notes have to be dated from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get a fit note from your doctor immediately, and claim from the date the fit note starts. You probably won't be paid until assessed and only if you make it into the support group - have you looked at the support group descriptors and checked that you meet at least one?

 

http://www.tameside.gov.uk/esa/lcwra

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, thanks for this. i have been submitting three-monthly fit notes but do i need to get another one backdated to the start of the new claim (which i dont know when it should be, should it be after failing the medical Dec 21 2011 or failing the tribunal Dec 31st 2012?

Also was the judge in error of law when he stated my medical was on jan 9th 2012 and not dec 21st 2011?

Also should i have been paid the assessment rate up until or now or is it because i claimed the CB-ESA that it was stopped after 365 days and then that beggars the question is it usual to have to wait so long for the decisions?

sorry for so many questions but im mentally and physically exhausted by all of this.

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, thanks for this. i have been submitting three-monthly fit notes but do i need to get another one backdated to the start of the new claim (which i dont know when it should be, should it be after failing the medical Dec 21 2011 or failing the tribunal Dec 31st 2012?

Also was the judge in error of law when he stated my medical was on jan 9th 2012 and not dec 21st 2011?

Also should i have been paid the assessment rate up until or now or is it because i claimed the CB-ESA that it was stopped after 365 days and then that beggars the question is it usual to have to wait so long for the decisions?

sorry for so many questions but im mentally and physically exhausted by all of this.

Thank you.

 

You claim after failing the tribunal - so the day after your payments stopped. As long as you have a fit note covering the period you shouldn't have to send a new one until the current one runs out.

 

Unless there is something significant about the dates of the medical, then it is just a simple error and not an error of law. It would only be an error of law if the mistake had an impact on the decision.

 

You were only entitled to 365 days contributory ESA, as you weren't placed in the support group. If you get placed in the support group in future then payments will resume.

 

Sadly, yes, it is usual for decisions to take a long time.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, thanks, thats excellent, just one more thing though, sorry, if my benefit stopped July 13 2012 and my tribunal was 31 Dec 2012, and have been submitting sick notes for the last two years (three monthly ones), do i re-claim from July 13 2012 or Dec 31 2012. and does my vet need to date the note from July 13 or Dec 31?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, thanks, thats excellent, just one more thing though, sorry, if my benefit stopped July 13 2012 and my tribunal was 31 Dec 2012, and have been submitting sick notes for the last two years (three monthly ones), do i re-claim from July 13 2012 or Dec 31 2012. and does my vet need to date the note from July 13 or Dec 31?

 

Oh dear, oh dear.....

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused::confused: oh no youre scaring me now, what does oh dear oh dear mean

 

The fact you're going to a vet for your fit note. I do suppose that's where donkeys would go, but still.....

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've been providing fit notes then just provide the next one when it is due. You can reapply at any time as your assessment was a year ago.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi i have a friend who has the same problem you had but she won her tribunal and was put in support group but does not recieve any esa as her work related pay ran out and as her partner works full time she isnt entitled to actually recieve any of the benefit on income related esa i hope this helps you some .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...