Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SORN Late penalty


packmule
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4138 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I Have received a late penalty notice from Cash Cow Inc (DVLA) which they have now passed to Phillips to collect.

This is for a motorcycle which has been sorn continually for the last 3 yrs. No reminder was received and I only knew when penalty arrived with a sorn form to complete, which was done and sent with accompanying letter explaining. The bike is in pieces and land locked with no possible way onto public land without removing neighbours fences. Still being persued ,will they take me to court for non payment or do I have to take them to court for being incompetant.

 

The bike has not been used or started for 3yrs,It cannot even be started in current state, and it cannot be moved from my garden .

The only "crime " I have committed is to forget ! which as far as iwas aware is not illegal. :mad2::mad2::mad2:

 

Any advice welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi welcome to CAG, I suppose that the condition of a vehicle that is still registerd (not scrapped) is irrelevant where a SORN is required.

I agree it's hard your right forgetting is not illegal, just the failing to comply with the regs.

 

You could attempt an appeal, but a lot of these fines end up with bailiffs at the door if not paid.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Have received a late penalty notice from Cash Cow Inc (DVLA) which they have now passed to Phillips to collect.

This is for a motorcycle which has been sorn continually for the last 3 yrs. No reminder was received and I only knew when penalty arrived with a sorn form to complete, which was done and sent with accompanying letter explaining. The bike is in pieces and land locked with no possible way onto public land without removing neighbours fences. Still being persued ,will they take me to court for non payment or do I have to take them to court for being incompetant.

 

The bike has not been used or started for 3yrs,It cannot even be started in current state, and it cannot be moved from my garden .

The only "crime " I have committed is to forget ! which as far as iwas aware is not illegal. :mad2::mad2::mad2:

 

Any advice welcome.

 

Why would they send any reminders out if the bike has been continuously SORNd? Or are you saying that the bike has not been used for over 3 years and you had forgotten to re-SORN it?

 

Can you clarify please!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

August 2012, new one actually issued in October 2012 after being informed I had not renewed.

But as no renewal was received why would I even think about it . I understand the resoning behind SORN notice but the impementation leaves alot to be desired

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it was un-SORNd for 2 months. Hardly the end of the world, in fact in my street there has been a car parked for well over a month with an expired tax disc and gets about 3 parking tickets every day. It is currently showing as SORNd on the DVLA data base! Despite me reporting it about 2 weeks ago, it is still there and attracting more parking tickets!

 

Not sure that there is anyway round it for you as you have even involved your MP. You seem to be one of the innocent people caught out by a system designed to get rid of illegal cars off the roads unfortunately.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem to be one of the innocent people caught out by a system designed to get rid of illegal cars off the roads unfortunately.

 

... which I suspect constitutes about 99% of the victims of this tax! It was never intended to victimise generally law abiding motorists but has become that to keep the cash cow flowing.

 

When a vehicle is on SORN I believe you should receive a tax reminder after 12 months to tax or SORN again as we all do each year when tax disk is running out. But as ever, the DVLA usually claim they don't have to sned this reminder, but just do it as a courtesy.

 

Then when they don't send one, and the motorist has nothing to prompt them (particularly on a SORN as there is no disk in their car window that they are driving to remind them) they fine you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Apologies, just seen this thread.

 

Packmule, in the past three years of ownership have you had the full 12 months issued to you when applying for SORN ?

 

On three occasions I have found that the renewal covers only 11 months (on two different vehicles), and so you may have been shortchanged by a month through no fault of your own, except maybe by being a tad too keen to notify them.

 

If this is the case then you could challenge the SORN updating in general as - with the same sentiments as Sailor Sam - you are a victim of ill-thought out legislation rather than a criminal trying to 'get away with it'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

still having problems, As a last ditch attempt MP has written to DVLA but as money is involved don't hold out much hope. :-x:-x:-x

 

Started a petition on 10 Downing St but cannot post the link if you wish to sign and try to stop this rip off please feel free.

 

It is petition No. 44601 "Amend SORN rules & DVLA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Add it to your forum signature. That way, wherever you post on this site, people can see it and sign it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might have been worth doing a bit of background digging on the SORN rules coz I seem to remember when they were discussing them in parliment that they went to great pains to stipulate that "this legislation is not designed to trap the "innocent" motorist that forgets, but the persistant non-payer" or words to that effect.

 

You could then have included this reference within your petition.

 

Clearly, the SORN rules generate the vast majority of their income from exactly the people they said they wouldn't hit!!

Edited by crem
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Crem,

 

Good idea , Found this so have redone new petition as old one cannot be amended with the new info

 

SORN was designed (House of Lords 14 Nov 2003) “to tracevehicles involved in crime and to trace the keepers of abandoned vehicles, andto help to attack the problem of evasion of vehicle excise duty… The draftregulations will have no effect on law-abiding citizens who license theirvehicles on time and are also not intended to catch those who may, throughoversight or difficulty, buy their tax discs a day or two late…” DVLA amplifiedearly 2004 “the Agency does not intend to persecute honest motorists but tocrack down on offenders who repeatedly abuse system.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

still having problems, As a last ditch attempt MP has written to DVLA but as money is involved don't hold out much hope. :-x:-x:-x

 

Started a petition on 10 Downing St but cannot post the link if you wish to sign and try to stop this rip off please feel free.

 

It is petition No. 44601 "Amend SORN rules & DVLA

 

Disgusting. Why dont they let people sorn for longer periods, then if they decide to bring it up to road use, they will be informed. All vehicles are tracked on the roadso if you was doing amnythng illegal we would deserve a fine.

Ive signed it as well as shared on Facebook. :evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why dont they let people sorn for longer periods, then if they decide to bring it up to road use, they will be informed.

 

Simple. They make very easy money from it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Packmule. Did you actually forget to notify Sorn or have you just forgotten that you notified them by post?

 

One thing a good many folk would benefit from keeping in mind is something that all insurance companies tell everyone "NEVER ADMIT LIABILITY"

By admitting that you failed to notify then you have closed and bolted the door to any effective defense.

 

In my opinion. If DVLA had not meant this to be a constant revenue stream from the innocent motorist then they would have made it in such a way that if you once notified a vehicle as SORN then that vehicle remains SORN until someone taxes it again for road use or the registered details are altered in some way. (E.G.) vehicle scraped, change of ownership etc under such circumstances the responsibility for the vehicle changes and therefore a new 'OFF ROAD' notification would be required.

If the vehicle is notified as dismantled or otherwise scraped then it's registration is destroyed; if it is exported then it goes through a different procedure; if it has a change of ownership then the new owner is responsible for it's registration and needs to declare it's status.

This would not only be a more logical system but also it would cost less to administer and be more efficient.

 

The big downside to this is that DVLA would loose all the revenue that they gain by bullying and extorting folks under the present system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hooligan,

 

I didn't forget to SORN, the reminder was not received and as you have no SORN disc or anything unless you write it down on a calender you have no idea when it is due to expire. This is what they rely on for their extra income. The bike was only unsorn for 2 months when bill arrived along with SORN notice it was immediatly SORN , they still come after you for £80 ( 12 months tax is £76 ) The amount of money they make from this is phenominal.

Just another way to fleece the road user.

Thanks for signing and sharing

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...