Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • they are out of time with their NTK anyway ignore them now sad you didn't spot this in the 1st place! none of what you have done was ever necessary!!
    • So what does this latest pronouncement from Juncker mean- is it more game playing or are we truly stuffed with my deal or no deal?
    • please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement- 21/06/19   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]- 12/07/19   3 Date received 15/07/19   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? N I can't see it   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes a ANPR Camera showing arrival and exit but separate parking machine in car park not at gates    6 Have you appealed? Y Post up your appeal] I am waiting for a copy of my appeal but I have other emails sent i can send  Have you had a response? Y. Email was never sent as they stated on 29th July. Finally got the notice of regection sent by email on 3rd Oct.    7 Who is the parking company? National Car Parks Limited owned by Park24.co   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] NCP, Terrace Road, Bournemouth    For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Not on the letter but found on line its BPA   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, BPA please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   in either case scan up bothsides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONL
    • Not much point in appealing. You paid for 4 hours and stayed for an extra 45 minutes. Goes to show what a bunch of crooks you are dealing with when you first appealed they delayed their response until you came liable for the higher charge and they wouldn't reduce that sum. From now on just ignore everything you get from NCP  and their unregulated debt collectors (birds of a feather). They will try to frighten you with increased costs  that you can safely ignore. In the  meantime please complete the questions asked by dx above and post up any PCNs so we can see if they got them right. Also we need to see their signs in the car park especially the one at the entrance; any that are different from the others and the T and Cs on the ticket machine. Before posting the PCNs please delete your name and reg. number plus anything else that might identify yourself.  
    • Don't forget ... the attorney general (Cox) who apparently advised 'misleading the Queen, Parliament and the British people as ' sounds good to me .. actually said they could ..   He doesn’t much like the idea of staying in the European customs union But said he would be willing to accept one if it would secure the goal of getting Britain out of the EU.    BUT He followed with “If we decided (meaningless distracting time suggestion) that we wanted to review our membership of any such customs union if we signed it – and I'm not saying we will – that's a matter for negotiation and discussion,”
  • Our picks

Invalidation

DWP admits covering up your right to a Recorded Assesment

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2482 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

From Atos Victims group website

 

Yesterday, the DWP disclosed that it has been sitting on legal advice, for over two years, to the effect that its WCA recording rules​ were illegal

 

Legal advice has been obtained to confirm that recording of assessments for claimants must be allowed without unreasonable obstructions


Taking a poke at the world

 

Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As we have said numerous times, make your own recording, you do not have to tell them you are recording and it would be a safeguard for the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
See this post for further information and a link to the original information a few posts further back

 

The problem is. If the ATOS person tumbles you are recording they can then terminate the Assessment. Considering some people are in a hell of a state when attending the assessment they wouldnt want another date and time. Its OK for some of us that might be able to take another daye but some simply cant or dont have the technical know how to make a covert recording

Armed with this new information ATOS no longer have the right to refuse a proper recording.

The document RFP27 should simply be quoted when asking for the Assessment to be recorded or the assessment deferred untill they have the equipment installed.

 

Search on Google for RFP27 and youll find the document as I cant post a link to it here

Edited by Invalidation

Taking a poke at the world

 

Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As we have said numerous times, make your own recording, you do not have to tell them you are recording and it would be a safeguard for the future.

 

Isn't the only rule that you can't do certain things with it? That is, you can't upload it to a public website, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you make a recording it is your own recording to do what you want with it.

 

This thread is about how the DWP have covered up your legal right to demand a recording from ATOS and they cannot refuse.

The Document RFP27 also shows how ATOS are breaking their contract with the DWP


Taking a poke at the world

 

Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Isn't the only rule that you can't do certain things with it? That is, you can't upload it to a public website, etc.

 

The DWP's position is that by uploading it to a public website you have in effect published it, and potentially made yourself into a Data Controller under the terms of the DPA. Whether that position is defensible at law I don't know, but it is the argument they use.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If the ATOS person tumbles you are recording they can then terminate the Assessment.

 

On what legal grounds?

 

 

Polly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On no legal grounds the DWP has ever established,Pollik

 

It's a position the DWP takes which relies on bullying and intimidation, because the incident will be reported as a failure by the claimant to submit to a medical - and your benefits will be immediately refused, unless and until you can muster the health and finances to take them to court months (or in the case of further appeal, quite possibly, years) later. A disgraceful situation.

 

On a more cheerful note I would like to acknowledge that point of antone's in post #7 above. That is exactly what the DWP has been arguing, for a long time now, but I am glad to say the 'FoI community' at WDTK is well on the case!

 

So here’s a happier Xmas story:-

 

Mr Mustard doesn't like Barnet council; as in, he really, really doesn't like Barnet Council.

 

The feeling is entirely mutual, not least because Mr Mustard is inclined to do careful research about e.g. spending habits and proposals,and link them to the personal details of councillors and officers, and then - blow me down (!) –publish his findings and opinions online in a blog enthusiastically followed by whatever the collective noun is for people who live in Barnet.

 

Back in 2010, a rather tearful 'corporate governance department' of the London Borough of Barnet complained to the InformationCommissioner's Office, that this all (sob!) just wasn't fair, and Mr Mustard really, really ought to stop it.

 

In correspondence which still brings tears of joy to my eyes to read, right to the end, the London Borough of Barnet went down in flames,at the hands of the ICO.

 

If you have the patience, I promise you the link is worth careful consideration. Don't peek now (!), but the last memo is an accidental disclosure by the ICO itself:-

 

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/94886/response/237295/attach/2/R%20IRQ0426076%20ICO%20Barnet%20correspondence%20re%20ENQ0391446.pdf

 

The principal relevance to the thread lies in s 36 DPA, of course: the DWP's erroneous arguments under the Data Protection Act are undergoing a similar DPA\FoI process of being ridiculed to death. With serious intent.

 

Could we all regroup at the main thread, now? :-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?336827-Announcement-ESA-claimants-now-have-the-option-of-having-their-WCA-recorded/page48

Edited by nolegion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On what legal grounds?

Polly

 

Whilst a claimant has a right to record what they wish, the Assessor also has every right not to agree to it and leave. You cant force anyone to be recorded.

 

Theres an old saying that goes, Your rights end where my rights begin, and that swings for both parties.


Taking a poke at the world

 

Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Could we all regroup at the main thread, now? :-

 

Why? the other thread contains nothing about this new revelation by the DWP


Taking a poke at the world

 

Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why? the other thread contains nothing about this new revelation by the DWP

 

What, apart from the original post?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?336827-Announcement-ESA-claimants-now-have-the-option-of-having-their-WCA-recorded&p=4074446&viewfull=1#post4074446 dated 11/12.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As we have said numerous times, make your own recording, you do not have to tell them you are recording and it would be a safeguard for the future.

 

Problem with that is the court can say it's inadmissible because you could have altered it. And it's all very well saying an expert could verify that you hadn't but who's going to pay for that? DWP certainly won't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Problem with that is the court can say it's inadmissible because you could have altered it. And it's all very well saying an expert could verify that you hadn't but who's going to pay for that? DWP certainly won't.

 

So you transcribe the recording and provide that. along with your annotaions of what their report claimed. If there was any serious discrepancy between what was on the assessment report and what you claimed I doubt any respectable judge and Doctor would dismiss it out of hand unless it was obvious there was some serious tampering


Taking a poke at the world

 

Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Problem with that is the court can say it's inadmissible because you could have altered it. And it's all very well saying an expert could verify that you hadn't but who's going to pay for that? DWP certainly won't.

 

That's not how it works; if you submit evidence, it's up to the other party, not the judge, to raise objections. For them to do so would be to suggest that you have deliberately falsified evidence, and they can't just say that just like that without opening a new can of worms for themselves.

 

Remember, he who accuse must prove. If they accuse you of tampering with the recording, they'd have to prove it to the judge's satisfaction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone noted there is no provision for recording of assesments/switchovers for PIP ?


Taking a poke at the world

 

Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After the 20 meters stitch-up, nothing surprises me any more. I thought they'd already hit rock bottom with quite a few of these so-called reforms, but have since found out that they'd barely started digging, it's getting to be the Mariana Trenches of deceit and exploitation out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't the House of Lords yet to harumph over the proposed changes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...