Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ruthbridge letter


paulie78
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I am after a bit of advice /reassurance

 

my dads received a letter from Ruthbirdge ltd today asking him to contact them to help them resolve an urgent matter

 

first thing i always do with such matters is google the company name to see what comes up

 

no surprise to me to find its yet another unscrupulous debt collector

 

my dad had a letter from Active Capital earlier on this year about an old statute barred debt of mine

(an old bank debt due to banks error of paying a DD id cancelled which i refused to pay

time ran away with itself 9 years later a letter from active capital appears adressed to my dad)

 

in this case i just sent a letter to them refusing to aknowledge the debt and informing them that if they tried to pursue the matter further

i would contact the nessacery official bodys and that was that my dad has mental health/severe memory issues

and is reliant on a support worker who manages all his affairs usually

 

but he was ina panic on the phone and i decided id call theese people to find out what they wanted

 

i explained dad could not communicate with them either in writing or by phone

and wow the lady on the other end was really agressive and nasty i was shocked

 

i dont want my dad to recieve anymore harassing letters or calls but considering they havent actually requested any amount of money as yet

 

can i still go ahead and send a letter of denial ?

 

Many thanks

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a start don't call them again. That's playing right into their hands and the treatment you got from the lady was a taste of it. Imagine if that had been your dad!

 

I don't suppose they have explained why they want you to call nor explained the urgent matter. Understand one thing its urgent only to Ruthbridge. If it is that important they will have no problems in putting their concerns in writing. Ruthbridge have a very limited threatogram suite and they are not very good at replying to anything that does not contain money or promises of money.

 

You don't say if you live at the same address as your dad. If you do I would wait until this firm write and explain what they want. Then you candeal with that. If you don't live in the same house I would write to them, on your dad's behalf, and tell them to remove his name and address from their systems because he has no wish to communicate with them. Tell them any further letters from Ruthbridge, or any of their agents, will be treated as harrassment and complaints filed with everybody.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NEVER CONTACT DEBT COLLECTORS BY TELEPHONE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. From the information provided, I would suggest that this is a fishing exercise by Ruthbridge. therfore your dad can choose to ignore or alternatively write asking for details of any claim they may have . You will need authorisation from your father.

 

 

Ruthbridge do try and pursue loads of SB debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys

ugh i know i shouldnt have called anxiety got the better of me

i wont make that mistake twice

though i really couldnt get over how agressive the lady i spoke too was

wow i was dumbstruck they wouldnt give me any details at all about anything even after i explained to them that i had permission/authorisation to speak to them

dad had given me the name of the person whose name was on the letter the relevant reference numbers etc so i had all the details.

 

Nope i dont live at the same adress as my dad but i do care for him as a couple of years ago he moved back here from cornwall after being away for 12 years

and he had no debts there and lived with me for a year

 

he certainly didnt amass any debts here nor any since of that

 

i can be 100 percent certain would active captial have sold my old statute barred debt maybe thats the only thing i can think off ? thanks so much for your help

 

I shall definately write a letter of complaint along with a written letter of authorisation from my dad to confirm they can deal with me and me alone its not the first time ive dealt with the likes of them but i thought it best to seek advice before doing something daft eg calling again or firing off a letter

 

Thanks again i really appreciate it

Link to post
Share on other sites

how about checking cra files?

 

see below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Tried doing that for myself a while back

 

last year Santander royally messed up and caused all kinds of problems with my account

and somehow 3 other clone accounts were made in my name that they sent out chequebooks and debit cards out for

 

i only received one of each and though they assured me they had solved the issue

 

i wanted to check my credit file just for my own peace of mind

 

but i hit a stumbling block with id (lack of it) but now it appears it might be a good idea to try again thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The name on the letter was probably meaningless. It is highly likely there is no such person working for Ruthbridge. Complain to their compliance manager - but don't expect too much. Stresds the complaint is official. When they run out of time (eight weeks) to satisfactorily resolve your complaint ramp it up a notch to the Financial Ombudsman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are adressed to my dad but im his primary carer so i gues ill have to write a letter of authorisation for him to read/sign just so that my letter will be taken seriously and any further correspondence (hopefully there wont be any) would be sent to me ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...