Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can be sure that pardoning himself, stopping the other prosecutions and vengeance will be his first priorities if he wins. i dont think he will win, but no surety on that
    • The other cases aren't going to happen before November though, are they? Reporters are saying he can't pardon himself for a state conviction. He would have to lean on the governor of New York state, as I understand it.
    • I am requesting your assistance to how I should go about a serious breach of my privacy that occurred during my stay at one of IHG’s hotel on Ma 2023. Having previously had items taken from my hotel room elsewhere I take the added precaution of using a security camera app on my device whenever I stay in a hotel room. The recordings are date and time stamped and it cannot be adjusted by the end user.   On this particular occasion I discovered evidence from my personal security camera recordings of a spy camera had been placed underneath my door, and can be seen moving along the base of the door for approximately 15 seconds.   The spy camera is in fact marketed as an inspection device of drains primarily but is known to be used in observing spaces difficult to enter. It is a usb endoscopic camera that has a length flexible cable that is semi rigid and can negotiate any obstruction by bending. The operator can be up to 3-4 metres away.   Infuriated as I had previously stayed with them in 2022 for 3 months at £260 per night that they would seek to question my honesty and invade my privacy. I immediately called reception and asked why they would do such a thing and if they had any concerns they were welcome to inspect my room and go through my personal belongings and ask me anything they wanted to. I was sleeping for the best part of my stay and was alone throughout.   I sent the recordings to the receptionist within the hour of finding them and I asked to speak to the manager of the hotel who I was told wasn’t present. I tried to have face to face meetings with him but he instead wrote to me denying the recordings were made at their hotel stating that they didn’t observe anyone in the corridor at the time of the recordings and that they don’t have a metal bar at the interface of the tile and carpet which corresponds to the overlying door. I rejected that statement on the grounds the video doesn’t show a bar but a reflection of light on the tile and you wouldn’t see a person outside my door because the cable is black and runs along the floor. If you don’t look for this you won’t see it. The matter was passed up to the area manager and he also denied the allegation. This is where the matter ends as far as IHG are concerned. Leading a busy work and family life I let the matter go but I found myself back at the same hotel a year later. I booked for  2 nights and was given a room facing the lobby door that led to the lifts. Unfortunately, from the hours of 3am I was woken up by the noise of the door opening and closing but also noticed shadows of a person standing in front of my door. At first I took no notice and put this down to a guest waiting for someone but the person or persons returned several times, standing outside my door for up to several minutes. I called the hotel reception and asked if there was an issue  on my floor and they said they would come up to check. They never said they would check the CCTV and as the incidents continued to happen up to 8am I called them 6 times. Given my past experience I didn’t think they took security as serious a# her establishments and made them observe the Cctv and let me know. The explanation I was given was that they could see residents there but they were heading down to breakfast. The time that I had noticed these feet by door was from 3am and breakfast started at 6.30am. It also didn’t explain why they would stand by my door for anything longer than 10seconds and if they were waiting for someone how likely is it that this scenario is played out 6 times when there was only 12 rooms per floor. Later that morning when I went down for breakfast the manager said he would move me to a room at the end of the corridor and asked me what my plans were for the day, essentially when would I be in the hotel. I stated that for the day I was out. He then said that all his staff were uncomfortable about me being a guest and said that I was not welcome there anymore. I had paid for the two nights but when it came to the end of the day I didn’t feel that I would be able to rest at the hotel given the hostility so I returned the next day to collect my remaining belongings, namely items of clothing, an iPhone charging cable and plug, and toiletries. Checkout was at 2pm and I was at the hotel at 3pm. All my belongings were gone and they couldn’t locate the items.  I plan to report the incident of the spy camera to the police, as well as the theft, and write to the hotel emphasising that this breach of privacy is unacceptable and the hotel's failure to properly investigate and address the issue is deeply concerning. The fact that I requested security checks to ensure my safety in the early hours was reasonable, yet their response to ban from the premises was excessive and even possibly discriminatory as I had revealed to them that I had been a victim of a hate crime given my sexuality. . I am seeking compensation for the infringement of my privacy, the lack of proper investigation, and the being humiliated and made to feel like an undesirable. I will request a full refund of my two-night stay totaling £390. Additionally, I will request compensation for the cost of my previous stay when the infringement occurred, which was £220. I am also considering damages for the infringement of my privacy but at a loss as to what this would equate to. I will close the letter giving them a 14 day timeframe to respond.    Is there anything you feel i need to consider here? Many thanks   
    • oF course, this is all just the start. trump is dragging it out as much as possible hoping to pardon himself, but the barrier the yanks had about admitting that a pres could be such a piece of err work has been broken and there is many more to come. His current criminal charges are extremely unlikely to result in jail time or anything other than fines  - but with some of the other charges - jail is pretty much mandatory - especially for one not only not on a first offense - but with others stacked up
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Acceptance Corp UK Ltd / Marlin Financial Services


amlania
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4183 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is what the have sent back after the letter " I do not acknowledge any debt to your company": As previously advised, your last payment was received on 10th August 2010 and therefore your debt is not statute barred. You were making regular payments in 2006 for £75.00 and you made one payment in August 2010, four years after the last payment was received. This payment started the six year clock, so to speak, and your account remains due and payable. This payment is proof that your account is not statute barred.

 

However, in the process of investigating your comments it has come to my attention that the balance outstanding is incorrect. Currently your outstanding balance is showing as £4,264.54 but I believe this to be incorrect. I believe your outstanding balance should be £1,486.24.

 

From 17th July 2003 to the date you agreed to return the vehicle, 21st June 2006 (36 months), you were responsible for making your monthly instalment payment of £433.78. Between July 2003 and June 2006 you should have made 36 payments of £433.78 which would have totalled £15,616.08 however you only paid £14,054.84. The difference between these two sums, £1,561.24, is your arrears figure and you remained liable for this. You have made one payment since 2006 in the sum of £75 so your current outstanding balance today stands at £1,486.24.

 

Please contact our office with your payment proposals.

 

So this was the letter.

 

All of this is absolute bull.. They are pulling figures from the air and they have no clue what they are talking about. The payments they are talking about are all phantom payments. The debt has already been removed from my credit report as it is statute barred.

 

Please can someone provide me with a template of a letter that I can send them so the can F OFF!

 

A nice hard hitting one.

 

Also how can I find the telephone number of CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP UK LTD as they seem to be impossible to speak to.

 

Anyone's help is much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit Acceptance Corp is a dissolved company I think so no telephone numbers available.

 

Have they given any eveidence of the August payment?

 

If not you must challenge the to provide unequivocal proof of this.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's all I can find I will ask a colleague who works wonders on questions like this, being a weekend there may be some delay.

 

This is what the have sent back after the letter " I do not acknowledge any debt to your company": As previously advised, your last payment was received on 10th August 2010 and therefore your debt is not statute barred. You were making regular payments in 2006 for £75.00 and you made one payment in August 2010, four years after the last payment was received. This payment started the six year clock, so to speak, and your account remains due and payable. This payment is proof that your account is not statute barred.

 

However, in the process of investigating your comments it has come to my attention that the balance outstanding is incorrect. Currently your outstanding balance is showing as £4,264.54 but I believe this to be incorrect. I believe your outstanding balance should be £1,486.24.

 

From 17th July 2003 to the date you agreed to return the vehicle, 21st June 2006 (36 months), you were responsible for making your monthly instalment payment of £433.78. Between July 2003 and June 2006 you should have made 36 payments of £433.78 which would have totalled £15,616.08 however you only paid £14,054.84. The difference between these two sums, £1,561.24, is your arrears figure and you remained liable for this. You have made one payment since 2006 in the sum of £75 so your current outstanding balance today stands at £1,486.24.

 

Please contact our office with your payment proposals.

 

So this was the letter.

 

All of this is absolute bull.. They are pulling figures from the air and they have no clue what they are talking about. The payments they are talking about are all phantom payments. The debt has already been removed from my credit report as it is statute barred.

 

Please can someone provide me with a template of a letter that I can send them so the can F OFF!

 

A nice hard hitting one.

 

Also how can I find the telephone number of CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP UK LTD as they seem to be impossible to speak to.

 

Anyone's help is much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. You do NOT have to prove the debt is statute barred the most prove unequivocally that it is NOT!!!!

 

So send the following by recorded delivery addressed to their Data Controller.

 

Ref: as on their letter:

 

FORMAL COMPLAINT.

 

Dear sir I refer to your letter dated xx xx xxxx in which you continue to press for payment in regard to a debt for £xxx.xx for which I do not accept or acknowledge any liability.

 

As previously stated any such alleged debt is STATUTE BARRED and I will NOT be making any payment now or in the future.

 

I remind you that the onus of proof that the alleged debt is NOT statute barred lies entirely with your company and it is no for me to prove that it is statute barred,

if you continue to process errorneous data and continue to press for payment I WILL report the conduct of you company to the OFT and the ICO without further reference to you.

 

Considering the time, stress,and inconvenience caused by your companys incompetence I shall also make a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

 

One would hope that the responsible persons within your company are familiar with the OFT Guidance on Debt Collection 2003/2012 and the sections regarding the pursuit of statute barred debt, if not I will be happy to enlighten you chapter and verse!!!

 

You may consider this letter my FINAL RESPONSE and no further correspondence will be entered into.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, lowlifes and the phantom payment con eh!!

 

Make a formal complaint to the OFT&TS regarding their fraudulent claim.

 

As for lowlifes and the letter, as above, I would also add the line "Thank you for your written evidence of your intention to commit an act of fraud, I have forwarded a copy of this letter to the OFT&TS, and should the need arise I will gladly show the court."

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will report them again believe me. I just cant believe where there getting these figures from...

 

Should i ask for a statement before i send this letter at least i have more proof when making another complaint.

 

Please let me know your thoughts!

 

And thank you all for your help here!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...