Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrows Default Judgement - HSBC Debt


loub
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4135 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been away fro a few days and came home to a claim form for the northhampton county courts. i have no idea what the debt is for, just an idea but no proof for what it is for.

 

whats the next steps?

 

attached the form so u can see the particulars of claim

 

if you cant see the document properly let me know and i will try again

Link to post
Share on other sites

right i have been researching across the site, i am assuming my response is to fill the acknowdgement of servise out, extend the time of the claim and request the documents needed to defend the claim.. i amalso assuming i need to request the regulated agreement, copy of credit aggreement and notice of assignment.. can someone tell me if i am right as i am paniking and to be honest i refuse to pay for a debt which i dont know about, if it comes to light i owe it then obviously i will go in a different direction.

 

I am also thinking that this debt is for HSBC charges on my current account, as they made me overdrawn by taking charges and if it is this then its 7 years old and maybe too old for them to be persueing but i dont know any of this untill they prove what the debt is for.

 

please help someone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you acknowledge the claim and that you will defend in full. Send them a request for the documents by recorded delivery. As the POC is pretty vague, I would suggest a part 18 request, probing what the debt is, whether they have proof of the debt being due e.g copy statements from HSBC, whether they have a copy of the original signed credit agreement for the HSBC account, whether they have a copy of the default notice issued by HSBC available for inspection, whether they have a copy of the assignment notice available for inspection. And in a separate letter enclosing the part 18 request, ask them for copies of all the documents that you require to defend the claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi loub

 

Try following this thread from page 9 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?326767-CapOne-Case-Ive-Started...-CLAIM-FORM-NOW-ISSUED-By-Capone/page9 less the merger doctrine/fos stuff, its pretty much standard format for dislcosure etc.

 

In your case you should request the agreement, the default notice, transaction history, the notice of assignment and...... if you want to be cheeky, the deed of assignment

 

Also cca request to AG

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi all, hope someone can help.

 

in a previous thread i asked for advice on what to do bout a claimform being put against me,

the debt i wasnt sure of what it was for etc.

 

i sent the acknowledgment to the courts asking for the time to be extended to 28 days and i sent a written letter, which i have copies, to arrow global asking for documents in order to prepare my defence,

 

i received nothing from arrow and i received my judgement this morning ordering me to pay the debt in full within 14 days.

i feel this judgement has been wrongly placed and wish to take it further and defend this,  obviuosly if its proven the debt is rightfully mine and within the 6 years then i will arrange a suitable payment plan.

 

Any help is much appreciated

 

i sent the letters as advised above, i received nothing from arrow and had a judgement through the door today which i feel has been wrongly placed. any ideas of what to do next

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you plead a defence loub?

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

PS Threads merged please keep to one thread per claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i sent the letters as advised above, i recieved nothing from arrow and had a judgement through the door today which i feel has been wrongly placed. any ideas of what to do next

 

Did you acknowledge the claim form online and that you would be defending ? If not, the court system has automatically given the CCJ by default. You therefore need to look at getting then CCJ set aside.

 

If you did acknowledge the claim form and that you would be defending, you had to submit a defence within 28 days of claim form. If you did not submit your defence then the CCJ may have been granted by default. Again you would need to set aside.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i just sent the acknowledgement back as directed, i had no defence to put forward which is why i wrote to arrow asking for all the documents i need, as it coincided with xmas i thought things were just slow. courts must of issued by default then. i sent a copy of the letter i sent to arrow to the courts aswell saying that i was asking for documents for my defence.

 

am i better to write to them or shall i fone them aswell?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definition of Default Judgment

 

Once a claim has been issued the defendant has 14 days in which to respond. If within that time they file an acknowledgement of service they are entitled to a further 14 days to return their defence. The law states that, if the defendant does not file an acknowledgment of service or defence, the claimant is entitled to ask the court for a default judgment. A default judgment is, therefore, a judgment entered without a trial after the defendant’s failure to defend the claim.

 

Irregular Default Judgments

 

The law distinguishes between two types of default judgments: “regular” and “irregular” judgments. A default judgment will be irregular if it has been entered when:

 

The defendant has filed an acknowledgement of service or a defence;

• The time for filing the acknowledgement or defence has not yet expired;

• The defendant has made an application to strike out the claim or for summary judgment;

• The defendant paid off the whole claim, including any costs and interest, before judgment was entered;

• The defendant has filed an admission to the debt and asked for time to pay.

 

A default judgment entered in any of these circumstances is not valid in law and the court must set it aside. Providing you have a defence with merit not that they Claimant has failed to respond to a CPR request

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

still working on this case, could someone tell me where the templates are for the letter asking to set aside the ccj.

i am wondering whether to just pay it and ask for the forms where u set up a payment plan, i didnt realise its going to cost me £80 to have it set aside which i havent got for another 10 days and i need the ball rolling before that really.

 

any advice would be helpful :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no templates Loub, its an application N244 with the fee.Request to amend judgment payment to monthly is the N245 and fee (£45) please complete and include your I&E and proposed monthly payment.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

really confused as to what to do because if it is the debt i am thinking off i shouldnt have to pay anything as its too old to be chased.... if its hsbc current account they continued taking payments for the loan i had with them causing charges and for my account being over drawn, this happened back in 2005.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then you must consider set a side on that basis of it being Statute Barred.Could you be exempt from Court fees?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

okai i have the form for set aside, borrowing money from a mate.. so that sorted... just need a printer now lol.....anyway i am reading thru the guidance notes and question 10... what info will i be relying on, 3 options are.. witness statement , statement of case or written evidence. i have none of them, i requested the statement of case from the arrow and i have revieved nothing back, i have copies of the letters i sent and receipts of the recorded delivery as proof i have asked. so what do i do?

 

and got to print a form for setting aside court fees so thats sorted too ....somethings going right woop woop lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are 100% sure its Statute Barred then you wont need any info to rely upon.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem Loub its also important to state what I have posted on post# 11 IE .... being an irregular Default Judgment because of your AoS but missed the defence deadline.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, i am filling out the forms for the n244 and confused on question 9 and it doesnt give help in the guidance notes. its asking me 'who should be served with this application?'... is this the courts or arrow global?? help please

 

also i am filling out the fee remission forms, is the name of the claiment me and the defendant arrow global, really confused and the guidance notes dont explain enough for me to understand

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Arrows Default Judgement - HSBC Debt
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...