Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I dont want to, i just wanted to relate with this person. The council just wants to rip off people
    • I paid for the furniture with a visa debit card so not sure if this is the same consumer rights as a credit card? The furniture is without a doubt unfit for purpose because of the reclining mechanism not working correctly. I suspect that I may be offered either a repair, a replacement or a credit note (that's if they accept that there are problems with the furniture). Do I have to accept a credit note or can I insist that I want a full refund?
    • Hi @Dislao As advice for everyone is different and tailored to your situation, please make your own thread and describe your issue.
    • Ok so they have given you the contract of you and packlink. your enforcing the rights of the contract between evri and packlink.... so I don't really think this contract makes a smudge of difference. unless ive missed something @BankFodder   Also on the bit that says "Evri also cite Clause 23 of the pre-exiting commercial agreement between the Defendant and Packlink,"   such agreement hasnt been provided so can't be considered. judges arent goign to consider a term that the defendant has just said exists. thats not how it works.    
    • I think Stockford Anderson are the land owners there. You could ring their London number 020 3443 8500 to confirm. if so the CEO paul Anderson and his son Aaron are about to climb Mount Everest to raise money for Dementia UK. There have been a number of fatalities on the mountain recently though the CEO of Iceland did complete the UK Dementia challenge last week. However the winds over Everest are going to increase in the next few days so anyone not on the way up at the moment are likely to be prevented from climbing.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lombard Direct/Arden Credit Management Query + PPI reclaim now


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3747 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

add up all you payments on theat sheet [easily done using the E symbol thingy top right toolbar on excel]

 

then recontruct the loan

 

£5000 over 60mts @ 9.9% as per the agreement [but minus the 914 ppi]

 

are your payments total more than this?

 

your loan should be recontructed without PPI.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have worked out the total paid is £4929 but then I am lost - reconstruct the loan? Presumably I am using the sheet you attached but I don't understand how to fill that in! I am sorry but I don't know what I am trying to achieve here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I think I may have sussed it! On the sheet you attached, I have put £5000 over 60mts @ 9.9% with a monthly repayment of £105 (ie £124 minus 15.5% PPI %). That gives a total of £6,300 meaning we actually now only owe £1,370, not £2,500. So am I actually trying to claim too much PPI back?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

just shows you what IS actually owed after the PPI is totally removed from the loan

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So are all my figures correct then, including my PPI reclaim, do you think?

 

Where do we go from here, bearing in mind I don't think we have received everything we should have from the CCA request, Arden are pushing for an Income and Expenditure form, and Resolvecall are now on the case?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore them as such

 

resolve call certainly they are NOT BAILIFFS

and have NO LEGAL POWERS

 

i'd write ardens and thank them for the CCA copy

remind them that a CCA request should contain a copy of the T&C at the time of undertaking the loan

for the request to be fully satisfied under the appropriate regulations.

 

having now studied the Agreement sent

it is apparent the account is subject to a PPI of which you knew nothing about

 

this is now subject to a reclaim with the OC

 

and at such time the account balance is in dispute.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

 

resolve call can be buffed away as above

 

rarely call anyhow

 

and remember

 

they are NOT BAILIFFSand have NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS

 

NEVER EVER pay any doorstepper

 

the money 9/10 goes in their pocket!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but that is only a guide [very rough]

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hiya I am back again.

 

idem have sent a copy of the terms and conditions therefore fulfilling their obligations under the CCA request.

 

Arden are now pushing for another Income and Expenditure statement to be filled in

 

- please can you tell me do we have to fill this in?

 

Do they have any legal right to this information?

 

Can I legally ignore them?

 

Many thanks in advance for your help once again!

 

LOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you dont have to fill ir in

 

no they dont have ANY legal right to it

 

only a JUDGE can demand to see such info.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hi we are back again!

 

PPI claim still ongoing.

 

However Arden have now offered to accept a one-off settlement payment of approx 30% of the outstanding debt.

 

We are probably going to try and do this

 

but they state "Once the agreed amount is paid, we will mark your account as closed and your account will be reported as "partially settled"

with the Credit Reference Agencies and no further collections activity would take place on the account".

 

My question is: is "partially settled" good enough?

 

I have tried searching around but still not sure what we should be aiming for.

 

Your help once again would be much appreciated.

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are giving you a discount because of the PPI I bet.

 

get the POI done

 

then think about settling if you need too.

 

partial settlement is s good as a default

 

just because they say they wont chase the rest

 

doesn't mean they wont sell the remaining debt on

 

and the process starts again.

 

with the next fleecers.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The PPI claim has been successful

- however

- RBS are saying they will pay Arden the bulk of the money

and the rest (interest) will come to us.

 

I have asked them to clarify why they are paying Arden

and so far they have not come up with a satisfactory answer.

 

So the plan was to pay Arden the settlement figure (much less than RBS want to give them)

then tell RBS to pay all the PPI refund directly to us (which I think they should be doing anyway).

 

I just need to know how to make sure that we get Arden off our backs

and what the credit file should be marked as in order to do so.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

without going back through the thread

who's owns the debt on your cra file or wherever?

 

if the debt has been sold

they cannot offset.

 

against FOS rules.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The loan account was transferred (sold) from Lombard (the OC) to Idem/Arden over two years ago.

 

The loan is very old so nothing whatsoever is showing on my OH's noddle report.

 

My understanding from reading the forum is that RBS should NOT be dealing with Arden, as you have confirmed above.

 

We want to pay Arden off and get RBS to pay us the full amount of the PPI claim directly.

 

Is this what I should be doing?

 

I don't want Arden to mark the file.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

once a debt has gone from the cra file it cannot return.

 

as for the debt being sold

and RBS trying to pay YOUR money to a debt buyer

 

you need to refer them/quote to the information on the FOS website

 

and

 

Edlington Properties v Fenner.

 

refers

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...