Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Told by employer to leave work because I am using crutches to aid walking


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4211 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I injured my knee two and half weeks ago and I am due to go into hospital shortly. I have attended work on crutches during this time but last week my employers told me that I would need to get a certificate from my doctor to say I was fit for work. I duly went to the doctor who advised that he would not do this as he had not signed me off work and I hadn't been on the sick, he did however provide me with a written letter which stated that I was happy and felt healthy enough to attend work for the two and half weeks since the injury. I attended work on Friday 19th Oct to be told that if I attended work again on Monday I would be told to leave the premises due to me using crutches as they felt they were a health and safety issue to myself and my colleagues. I am an admin worker in an office and I am sat at my desk only getting up to use the facilities that I require throughout the working day. I want to know if they have the right to stop me going onto the premises, they have not given me any written documentation explaining the reasons why they will not allow me into the office and I am afraid that if I do not attend then, this will go against my sickness record and as I will be off work after the operation then this will be another mark against my sickness record.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, they have every right, at the end of the day you are an employee and they are the employer

 

on a side note, the employer has a legal obligation for your welfare and anybody on the premises under

the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations

 

what needs to happen is the employer to do a risk assessment on you if your doctor is happy for you to continue in work till your operation

 

things that need to be considered are things like

 

stairs

fire escape/regulations

etc

 

most absece procedure is done over a 12 month period and the amount of absence in that year. i dont know what yours is but thats the norm. going into hospital is a valid reason and at any stage interview, this will be taken into consideration. at the end of the day its not your fault you are injured. its even better if the injury was while at work.,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Grateful for the information and I do understand they have to abide by the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations and take into consideration others welfare but are my employers obliged to provide me with any written confirmation of the assessment and outcome.

 

My concern is what happens if I end up on crutches to aid my walking for months after the operation or even permanently and even if my doctor signs me off as fit for work, would my employers have to reassess the risks and would I have any rights at all if they decided to dismiss me because I was permanently on crutches?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the normal routine then would be to refer you to occupational health for a back to work plan,

they will give you a copy of any report to your employer on your condition and prognosis

they will recommend any adjusted duties if applicable until you reach your full potential. believe me your employer will want you back at work as quickly as poss, if on crutches, their is no problem as long as adaquate risk assessments have been completed

 

in this circumstance, they can only , and i will not use the word dismiss, but made redundant through ill health retirement or capability, but that is quite rare and only after a long drawn out process

 

their are laws like disability discrimination that would fit in the worse case sinario but lets get you fit and well first and not dwell on things that may happen

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have edited the thread and your OP to clarify that the employeR told you to leave work, not the employeE

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add that if they sent you home from work, you should still be receiving full pay, not unpaid sickness absence.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

most absece procedure is done over a 12 month period and the amount of absence in that year. i dont know what yours is but thats the norm. going into hospital is a valid reason and at any stage interview, this will be taken into consideration. at the end of the day its not your fault you are injured. its even better if the injury was while at work.,

 

All absence procedures assume all absences are "valid" so not quite sure what you mean by "taken into consideration."

 

OP, I woukd ask you employer for an OH referaland a risk assessment to be done as above. I would also WRITE and state your GP will not issue a fit note, as you are fit for an office job. Ask for confirmation of the date on which the risk assessments will have been done and you can return from "medical suspension."

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add that if they sent you home from work, you should still be receiving full pay, not unpaid sickness absence.

 

Would that not be the case if the GP had said the OP was fit for work? From what I understand, the GP has also said currently unfit for work - if that's the case, arguably normal sick pay provisions would apply after the OP has handed in the fit note.

 

Also to add to southern jessys post - redundancy wouldn't apply here - a capability dismissal is a separate entity. But I don't think the OP will have that problem (hopefully)!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...