Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

natwest formal notice of intention to file a default! HELP!!


leanne1892
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3990 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I had two accounts with Natwest and both had overdraft facilities,

 

I fell behind with these accounts and ended up in a Insolvency agreement along with other debts

however this failed and i have now been served with a formal notice of intention to file a default if payment is not made or an agreement is not arranged to pay these debts back,

 

one is for £1545.57 and

the other is for £2109.62

 

along side these is a loan with Natwest

balance being just under £14k,

 

there is no way i can afford much to pay towards these as my circumstances have not altered,

 

with the bank accounts

 

is there anything they need to provide to show me agreeing to the overdraft facility

and

with the loan can i send them a CCA request?

 

I have until the 7th Nov according to this letter

 

any advice will be much appreciated,

 

I am also sure that i had two credit cards with them but there is no mention of these cards on this notice

and I am awaiting noodle to unblock my account for me to check up on this,

 

Thanks :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

just means they are going to trash your CRA file

 

its prob shot anyway

 

so i'd not panic about the letter.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the quick reply,

 

yes it is awful as it stands so cant get much worse :(

 

they are stating they will seek court action etc

 

is there anything i can send to delay them or what type of offer amount would be classed as acceptable

 

i cant offer much more than £5 per month but this wont even touch the sides on the amount i owe them,

 

also they are requesting me to send the cards back which i dont have any more as i shredded them along time ago will this be an issue?

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Overdrafts and current accounts are no t covered by the CCA 1974 in the same way as loans or credit cards, the would have been a letter of acceptance of the facility offered which would have terms and conditions in it.

 

Yes a CCA request for the loan is fine.

 

As to the cards tell them they are destroyed, just put a covering letter in with the CCA request.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

green library tab up top

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

i have sent the sar request and

 

now have a letter back stating they cant deal with it as i never signed the sar request,

 

i was always under the impression never to sign any forms

 

so this must of been an oversight but just to check:

 

Do i have to sign the form or are they fishing for my signature?

 

thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can sign SAR requests to the OC always

 

just never send a sig on a CCA request or any sig to a DCA

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget the ''myth'' always sign a SAR it is a lawful request for your personal data, would yuo like someone else to access your data??? Also the bank must apply the rules to be sure that the data is being sent to the right person.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all the SAR was sent off requesting all information held on all accounts,

yet to this day its not been fully complied with Ive had no credit agreements from loans etc,

 

I sent them (natwest) a letter along with also sending it to Triton (inhouse debt team) stating that they had not fully complied with my request sent back in Oct

and that i would not be led into discussion until i had the details requested,

 

the 40 days has now elapsed and a letter dated 9th Jan from Triton states

'We have recieved your letter dated 1st Jan and have deleted your telephone number at your request....

.Please note that your SAR request has been processed and the information will be with you in due course'.

 

I then get a letter dated the 11th Jan from Natwest including copy of statements for my 3 accounts but no details from the loans or credit cards,

the letter goes on to say that in regards to my SAR request i will need to correspond with the relevant team for Credit cards

and goes on to supply a different address, do I need to SAR this team and send a further £10 or just a chase letter?

 

Ive already had correspondance back from mortgage team (stated they dont hold any data as no mortgage with them),

the loans team giving me details on PPI only as stated they are unidated with requests and that thisnis what most SAR requests are after

but ive sent them a chase letter stating this is not adequate and that I want signed agreements

and breakdown of what is owed etc but not yet heard anymore back,

i seem to just keep sending the same letters to all different PO Box addresses and not getting anywhere,

i was under the impression that I had to send one SAR and all relevant departments would action there data,

can the account be put into dispute? if so how?

 

Please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok There is no obligation on the creditor to provide ''agreements'' with a SAR- sections 77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 is intended for this purpose.

 

You are correct one SAR should provide ALL data on ALL accounts with that company, you need to write a formal complaint to the Data Controller at NatWests London Head Office.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you,

 

In my letter from the loans side of it where they have broke down the PPI they state in there letter ' requests of this nature and the majority are to assist in completing applications to reclaim PPI, it appears that your request may be in connection with PPI and rather than complete a full SAR on all your current and historic banking arrangements with us we are able to summarise your PPI details and these PPI details relating to your loans can be found below, if we have misinterpreted your request. and you still want a full SAR or copies of your loan agreements then please let us know' ..... So i sent a letter on 3rd Jan stating this was not adequeate and that i did want the full SAR and loan agreement not heard anymore as of yet

 

So what does a full SAR include? and should i CCA the credit and loans side ?? sorry i am just confused as to what a SAR and CCA entitle me to, thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you,

 

In my letter from the loans side of it where they have broke down the PPI they state in there letter ' requests of this nature and the majority are to assist in completing applications to reclaim PPI, it appears that your request may be in connection with PPI and rather than complete a full SAR on all your current and historic banking arrangements with us we are able to summarise your PPI details and these PPI details relating to your loans can be found below, if we have misinterpreted your request. and you still want a full SAR or copies of your loan agreements then please let us know' ..... So i sent a letter on 3rd Jan stating this was not adequeate and that i did want the full SAR and loan agreement not heard anymore as of yet

 

So what does a full SAR include? and should i CCA the credit and loans side ?? sorry i am just confused as to what a SAR and CCA entitle me to, thanks :)

 

Standard practice with NatWest. Now you have replied you will probably start getting all sorts of odd letters from various departments. Eventually they will send you some very basic information and a letter saying other departments will send information separately.

 

They really are useless at SARs - mine went 3rd October and the first pretty useless bits arrived last week.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always send anything like SARs or CCA requests to the Bishops Gate, London address addressed to the Data Controler, it avoids the useless ''tasked'' teams messing around with bits of data from all over the place.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all update on the issue and advice required.

 

I sent a letter off to the Bishops Gate address (2nd class not recorded) and heard no more,

 

then a letter today came dated 20th Feb from CapQuest stating they have been appointed (what does this mean?)

by RBOS to the outstanding balance of £17,364.30

 

This consists of:

£13858 Loan

£2088 Overdraft

£1418 Overdraft

 

I also however have two credit cards with the natwest that seem to keep getting ignored,

they never sent me any details about the credit cards in my SAR request

and the amount is not included in the amount with Cap Quest,

why would this be?

 

Ive stressed in letters to them that I will not instigate into conversation until all details requested in the SAR

where supplied to me or the £10 returned

 

yet again nothing gets sent about the credit cards,

 

these credit cards are on my credit file along side all the other natwest debts,

 

just wanted to see how to proceed with this?

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

appointed means trying to fleece you

they dont OWN it - ignore them.

 

if the SAR is missing data

 

send them proof from the CRA file

 

along with a failure to comply letter

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ive sent off the failure to comply letter due to missing data linked to the two credit cards held with Natwest but not heard back about this apart from two stand alone letters one being:

 

Recieved on 20th Feb 2012 from CapQuest stating they have been appointed by RBOS and have been instructed to consider litigation by 21st March.

 

Second letter dated 6th March from HL Legal solicitors stating capquest have appointed them and that if the account is not paid in full or a satisfactory proposal for settlement in received by 20th March court proceedings MAY be issued.

 

I am confussed where i stand with this debt as i dont know who is actually dealing with it and what letters to send etc, the debts they are chasing me for is a loan and two overdrafts which they have supplied details for in the SAR request but they have failed to comply fully by not sending me credit card info aswell (as they have supplied all details for the said accounts they are chasing do i have to conform or can i demand full compliance for all accounts regardless of which ones they are chasing payments for??)

 

I am not in the position to offer anything of great amount so what they class as satisfactory proposal will be nothing compared to my idea of it so unsure how to proceed.

 

Shall I make an offer?

Await full compliance for all accounts from SAR request before doing anything?

Something else....

 

I have only just started a new job so not got any benefits updated (some are currently held to stop overpayment as I am now working more hours my income has increased) and I am up the wall so I cant even confirm how much income i will be on until all has been confirmed but need to get all this sorted once and for all.

 

Any help is greatly appreciated, thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank is obliged to send data on ALL accounts you hold with it, so tell the the SAR is unacceptable as it is incomplete.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they still able to chase me for the debts that they have complied with? as they have complied with the loan and sent all details linked to the two accounts with overdrafts and thats what caquest are demand repayments on, they never refer to the cedit card debt but I dont know why? (i am assuming they avnt got the paper work) so they have just chased the ones they can prove?

 

shall i resend the failure to comply letter and state I will not engage further regarding ANY debts with them until its all been actioned?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No compliance with a SAR does not prevent a creditor/DCA from carrying out all collection activities.. it really hasn't got anything to do with the bank proving what they can or cannot rely on, it is a straight forward request for information.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...