Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks, dx. Yes, I may need to turn my attention into some other things.
    • no they wont  can you PLEASE stop panicking about a nothing burger   dx  
    • Where a person who owns or partially owns a property enters into an IVA, it's usual practice that in the fifth year, the person has to attempt to re-mortgage the property to release equity. It's extremely rare that a homeowner will be successful in re-mortgaging due to having a poor credit rating. Where the owner is unable to re-mortgage, the IVA is extended for a further year. This is absolutely normal practice in an IVA, and if your sister cancels payments to the IVA, the IVA is at risk of failing and she could be made bankrupt, therefore losing any equity she has in the property. 
    • Right. So I think it would be  good idea to give a brief description of the property, for example detached house, or flat or terraced. And some sort of identifier so we can distinguish from other properties you handle. An incomplete street address eg "No.14" would do so while preserving your privacy. Is the freehold title discrete for the property, or does it cover other leasehold properties? And a bit about your history, how current ownership came about. At one stage you said it used to be your family home, elsewhere you wrote that you'd bought the leasehold. Did those comments refer to this property? Did you acquire it on the open market, or from your family? Is this the house with the garages, where you own the freehold? Trying to understand whether there are underlying reasons that might account for problems with valuation, eligibility for finance, and the fact that neither you nor Lender found it possible to sell. Finally (for the moment) you refer to existing litigation. Does that relate to this property? If so it would be good to give a brief overview. Civil or criminal? What role do play .. claimant, defendant, appellant, respondent?  Charge, or cause of action. You don't want to go off on separate path that would better joined to the current proceedings. 
    • Can you confirm the client on the letter please? Is it The Original Energy Provider or PRAC Energy? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Appealing a CSA decision


Ros1609
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4032 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Has anyone ever been successful?

 

My ex husband has moved in with his girlfriend and her 4 kids which means my money has dropped by £17 per week. Its a big drop considering our children are aged 3 years and 2 years so I can only work part time at best because childcare costs are crippling even with extra funding my Health Visitor got for me. At the moment I'm back on full benefits as my little boy has been diagnosed with development delays and I couldn't juggle work and his various appointments

 

The CSA said I could appeal the decision but few were successful and they warned me my money could drop even more as a result. Not sure what to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

I won't get a private agreement. My ex resents having to pay any money towards his kids

 

This sounds a little too fimilar of a situation, my son has development.delays too.and.my sons father refuses.to pay for his son, everytime i rang csa up they were just draggin their feet so i rang up and told them.i was sick of their hot air and that i wanted to speak.to someone more senior than them, they soon took out a deduction of earning order out, he finished his job because of it.

So my advice would be to ring up and tell them.you want a recalcuation and if they say they think its right tell them you want to speak to.a supervisor or management or the.complaints department they the would have to.look at the case again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The only way you can appeal your ex getting an allowance for the kids in his partners house would be if he actually didn't stay in this house. if he does stay then it is legislation and he has to get the allowance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate he has moved into a house with children - I'm not disputing that. I'm asking they relook at the amount they have taken off me as 25% is too big a drop

 

They don't take 25% off you. They take 25% off his net income then give you your 15%, 20% or 25% depending how many kids you have. For example

 

Your ex without kids in his household

His net income is £200, say you have 3 kids so you get 25% of the £200 = £50 weekly maintenance

 

Your ex with 3 kids in household

His net income is £200, your ex gets 25% taken off his net income of £200. £200 - £50 = £150 you then get for 3 kids 25% of the £150 remaining of his net income = £37.50 weekly maintenance. So your maintenance reduces by £12.50 not 25%

 

Hope this all makes sense

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the letter I got said the payments I recieve drop by 25% and this was confirmed by the CSA on the phone and having received my first reduced payment and doing the maths thats whats happened if you see what I mean? The figures they gave me show his maintenance drops from £69 per week to £52 per week

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

@babyd85... you are wrong on that

 

IF the earnings are below 200 AFTER the "RC discount" he goes to reduced rate: so £5 for first 100, then 15/20/25% for remaining...

 

so following your example: 150 left over

 

he would pay £5(for 100) plus 15% of £50. = £5 + 7.50 = 12.50

 

actually, i believe I Am wrong too on this, for reduced rate the %'s are higher... i believe 19% ffor 1 child between 100 and 200... (check csa website)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The calculations, are the calculations !!

 

If his new partner has 4 kids, then his payment to you will be reduced.

The only worthwhile appeal you have, is if the figures are wrong.

 

And you should be able to work it out, based on wjhat you use to recieve.

You can also use the CSA, online calculator, to help you.

 

This is why, voluntary agreements are far more advantagous, for the benificary.

Too late now, he'll pay less, because he has new dependants.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You asked for advise. I fail to understand, your response.

 

Indeed, the tribunal, will decide.

But understand, that if he has new dependants, the calculations change, downwards, I'm afraid.

 

Let us know the outcome..... it aint over, till its over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hmmm well maybe no need for a tribunal after all. My ex husband has split up with his girlfriend and moved back in with his mum. Time will tell if its a permanent split or if they just need some time apart but apparently he has already phoned the CSA to tell them of the change in circumstances. Think Imight give them a ring tomorrow just to be sure tho

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...