Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
    • The airline says it is investigating reports that customers can view other passengers' personal information.View the full article
    • They are finding new ways to cut back on household spending as China’s economy loses steam.View the full article
    • Sorry I meant credit fix - I really wish I'd known this before - kicking myself right now  If they come back to me asking for more money I'll cancel it and start trying to deal with the debt myself let's see what they say  Feeling tempted to cancel it now but scared that some of the debts will do more CCJ's on me and I'll have to wait 6 years again.  2 of the CCJ come of this year and then I'll only have the iva in credit file - effectively if I'd have not took out the iva in 2021 I'd have clear score by now - but then again would I because I would have been hounded the last 3 years, as bad as it is it's saves me lots of headaches whilst my debt was still within the 6 year mark.  I think most of them are near there but in all honesty no point chasing them if I do cancel iva I'd jjst wait for the ones who contact me and then start the relevant letter process on them.  Of over 6 years easy if not still possible to write off. My true victory would be having the iva wiped off my credit file as mis sold or something that way I Don't have to wait till 2027 Other option is to fight back and ask for them to offer the creditors to accept payments so far and use the following method    Will your IVA firm agree to complete your IVA on the basic of funds paid to date? The Guidance lists a lot of factors to be considered in deciding whether a settlement on the basis of funds paid to date should be proposed. You should read the list. But that may not give you any feel for whether they apply to you or not. The following are my thoughts on when an IVA should be treated as settled, not failed. They assume that you have £75 or less to pay a month: if you would currently qualify for a Debt Relief Order, then your IVA should be settled now  There is no point in making your IVA fail and you have to apply for a DRO – it will not generate another penny for your creditors. If you are renting and owe less than £50,000, check the DRO criteria now and talk to National Debtline on 0808 808 4000 about whether you qualify. You may have been told at the start of your IVA that you aren’t eligible – still check now as the DRO criteria have changed, your situation has got worse, and some people were given incorrect information about DROs at the start. if you have no assets that would be realised in bankruptcy (eg a house with equity, car worth over £2000), then your IVA should be settled now Same as (1), there is no point in making you apply for bankruptcy after your IVA fails. if your only asset is a car that is worth less than £8000, then your IVA should be settled now A car that is worth say £5000 would normally be sold in bankruptcy and you would be given a small amount to buy a cheaper car. But your creditors would not get any benefit from this as the Insolvency Service takes the first £8000 raised to cover its own costs. if you have significant assets, the closer you are to the end of the IVA, the less reasonable it is to fail it If you have been paying your IVA for 4 years, you have done your best over a long period. It isn’t your fault you can no longer continue. The fact you may have had equity to release isn’t relevant as that simply isn’t going to be possible. if your situation will clearly improve soon, then it’s unlikely your IVA will be settled I mean real improvements, not hoping that prices fall. If I can get them to accept payment to date or threaten with cancellation hopefully they may accept it -  Other option is to try and borrow money and pay make a full and final offer  Or I can just ignore and hope for the best which I'm very tempted to do especially if they respond to my review with bullying tactics despite me being skint as a fart with no mortgage as renting  It's so stressful but I've just checked the iva agreement from 2021 and it's Cabot 2 accounts Lowell about 5 accounts and then lots of repeats of the same debt with for example zopa and Cabot same amount listed twice -  also loyyds banks but I'm sure that's older than 6 years and not on credit file anyway  If I can somehow remove the iva from my credit file I'd be happy 
    • India has one of the world's fastest growing economies but the benefits are yet to fully reach the poorest.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What STANDARD FORM OF RESTRICTION should we use?


Kennel
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2619 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI,

I am the sole owner of a freehold property.

My Land Registration has no motgage, restrictions, notices or any other financial registrations.

A friend has lent me £10,000 and we both want to secure the loan on the property.

He is using "Land Registry Application to enter a restriction RX1" and I obviously am giving the relevant consent.

My simple question is:-

WHAT STANDARD FORM OF RESTRICTION DO WE USE? (A choice is given in "Appendix C": A to PP)

With thanks.

Kennel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

I'm sorry you haven't had any replies yet, but this could be due to the long weekend and good weather for those lucky enough to have some. :)

 

I'm going to move your thread to the legal forum where I think the guys should be able to help you.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kennel and Welcome to CAG

 

Using the RX1 form I would assume its " C " Application made with the consent of the registered proprietor " , your friend is the applicant and you are the Proprietor giving Consent.

I personally would run this by a Conveyancing Sol first need to be watertight for your own security.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply Andy,

I have, with the aid of my own small intellect, narrowed the choice to Standard form "N" and this would seen to suit my circumstances.

However I would like conformation on this, do you agree that FORM N is the most suitable.

Clearly I do not have any money (I am on pensions credit) to pay the £300 to £500 that solicitors demand for this small piece of advice.

With thanks.

Kennel

Link to post
Share on other sites

RESTRICTIONS: Use Form RX1

 

These restrict the registered proprietor’s ability to deal with the land.

 

Practitioners should be cautious before applying for a restriction. It is not enough to make the application simply because there is an arguable case. It must be shown that there is a definite case for a restriction. There has to be a beneficial interest.

 

When applying to register a restriction on Form RX1 you must use the Land Registry’s standard forms. These are not actual forms, but are standard wording and can be found in Practice Guide 19 Appendix B. The form must be copied into Box 10 on the form and you must specify which form has been used (by using the relevant letter). The most familiar is Form A (used where a client has made direct contributions to the purchase of the property but is not the registered proprietor). If there is no available form of wording, the Registrar will only approve the form of wording if it is:

 

Reasonable;

The application would be straightforward;

The application would not place the Land Registry under an unreasonable burden.

(N.B. a higher application fee is also required)

 

Once an application has been made, the Registrar will inform the proprietor who has 15 days to object to the application.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your general advice Andy,

Unfortunatly it does not answer my original question that was:-

 

My Land Registration has no motgage, restrictions, notices or any other financial registrations.

A friend has lent me £10,000 and we both want to secure the loan on the property.

He is using "Land Registry Application to enter a restriction RX1" and I obviously am giving the relevant consent.

My simple question is:-

WHAT STANDARD FORM OF RESTRICTION DO WE USE? (A choice is given in "Appendix C": A to PP)

 

Or my follow up post that was:-

I have, with the aid of my own small intellect, narrowed the choice to Standard form "N" and this would seen to suit my circumstances.

However I would like conformation on this, do you agree that FORM N is the most suitable.

Clearly I do not have any money (I am on pensions credit) to pay the £300 to £500 that solicitors demand for this small piece of advice.

 

Thank you for your attention on this matter.

Kennel

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I know Kennel RX1 is the form for a legal charge but why not give the Land Registry a call to clarify.Further guidance:-

 

http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/professional/guides/practice-guide-19

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy,

Thank you but I allready have Practice Guide 19.

The reason I am asking you and this FORUM is because the LAND REGISTRY WILL NOT GIVE THIS DETAILED TYPE OF ADVICE.

Does your reply mean that you DO NOT KNOW THE ANSWER TO MY QUESTION or YOU WILL NOT GIVE ME THE ANSWER TO MY QUESTION?

Regards.

Kennel

Link to post
Share on other sites

The answer is I do not know exactly apart from the fact that the form stated RX1 is the form used to place a charge on a property.Which section your friend completes is C.

I am not ofay with conveyancing law and only have knowledge of the Charging Order /Restrictions.

 

4.6.2 Application form and fee

 

Although the order may be addressed directly to the Chief Land Registrar, you should make a formal application for the restriction to be entered. This will ensure that the restriction is entered against the correct titles.

 

Your application should be made in form AP1 (not RX1) (r.92(8), LRR 2003) and should be accompanied by the fixed fee prescribed under the current Land Registration Fee Order.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say "my friend completes section C" do you mean:-

1) Section 8C in RX1

2) Appendix C in Practice Guide 19

3) Standard Form C in Appendix C (If you mean this one it is for deceased people).

Additionally my friend and I specifically chose RX1 as against AP1 because it afforded my friend more security on his loan (i.e. I or my executors could not sell without his consent in AP1 the land Registry are only inform the registrant)

I think we had better give up this dialog it's a bit like THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND.

Kennel

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

you need to start a new thread>>clickme

of your own

 

thread closed

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2619 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...