Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Received court papers by Howard Cohen / Santander.


chloeair
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4289 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am not a legal person, so below is my amateur view.

 

CPR stands for Civil Procedure Rules. It is a set of rules that govern the way the legal system in the County Courts works. You don't need to know them all, but you should know that they exist. They will make the process fairly predictable in what steps are taken when.

 

CPR 31.14 is Disclosure and Inspection of Documents. It is used to request documents from the other side that relate to the particulars of claim. For example, the agreement is mentioned in the POC. While you have already asked for a copy of the agreement with your CCA request, you can (and should) also request it using CPR 31.14.

 

Hopefully someone better qualified than me will be along to help you further.

Edited by Bandit127
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - knew I started another thread but I did it before the old thread was moved from the DCA group - sorry to cause confusion.

 

The Claimant is listed as Santander Cards UK limited.

 

I have just been online and acknowledged the claim and requested the 28 days.

 

So, I have sent already a CCA to Howard Cohen, do I need to send the CPR 31.14 to him as well, or to Santander?

Could anyone tell me where I find a copy of a template to send?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I choose to just to complete the form with expenditure - can i include my babies nursery fee in this?

Just worried as I owe the debt if I am doing the right thing - if they can't provide the CCA does this make a difference to me having to pay the debt?

The expenditure looks dire as it is.

Plus just had some really rubbish health news from Friday from a lump being removed on my leg and it seems so bloomin hard work to fight any of this. If I was to offer £5 or £10 a month would they laugh at me?

I work about about £360 a month for household? to include my babies nappies, milk and my food - would that be about right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, include child care. £10 for haircuts, holiday fund etc etc. Put what you can in - the judge will want to take some stuff out (that is human nature after all) and the more you start with the more you have left. Do not worry if it comes out as a minus number!

 

Fill out your Statement of Affairs at make sense of cards. You can save this and use it as a reference for the court form.

 

Internet and broadband/cable can be seen as luxuries. If you smoke, you are on your own... But the entries for haircuts, clothes, holidays etc are there for a reason. Put £10 in each of those.

 

I don't like posting links to "other" debt sites but the Bankruptcy and Living With It forum on MSE is excellent for finding out what a good SOA looks like and what an Official Receiver would accept as legitimate expenditure. Have a look through the posts until you find someone who has posted their Income and Expenditure or SOA. The feedback and comments will let you get a good idea of what is generally acceptable.

 

If that is the way you want to go I suspect you will get a fairer deal from the court than you would from the DCA.

 

And like I said - don't worry if it comes up with a minus number. It is a statement of fact regarding your I&E. If it comes up minus - the judge will not send you to prison but you might want to look at what you could change going forward. After all this has settled down...

 

P.S. Don't post your own up on there unless you use a different user name. The DCAs read both forums and you don't want that info available to them...

Edited by Bandit127
Added a P.S.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much.

Got a bit tearful trying to sort it out tonight as my finances actually just don't add since I was on my own. Even being truthiful and adding it what I do get still makes it look rubbish.

I kinda think looking at it that maybe it will be easier doing it this way than the DCA.

I have managed to keep up to date with my personal loan as it is with my own bank and am always terrfied they would just take it from my wages leaving me unable to pay the rent - will the court look at me badly for keeping up with one debt and not another?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much.

Got a bit tearful trying to sort it out tonight as my finances actually just don't add since I was on my own. Even being truthiful and adding it what I do get still makes it look rubbish.

I kinda think looking at it that maybe it will be easier doing it this way than the DCA.

I have managed to keep up to date with my personal loan as it is with my own bank and am always terrfied they would just take it from my wages leaving me unable to pay the rent - will the court look at me badly for keeping up with one debt and not another?

I doubt it. The DCA industry certainly don't care.

 

After this has been sorted you should open an account with a bank that is not connected to your debts. You can get control back then. Your credit rating probably already has defaults - and if you accept this claim you will have a CCJ too. So, no point in sacrificing all for a bank loan and credit rating.

 

Back to the claim - when does the acknowledgement need to be in by? While you could defend if the CCA is not compliant (and it probably won't be) you should understand that it will probably take energy and stress to defend and you should figure that in with your life as a single mum and the bad news about your lump when you decide which way to go.

 

Either way we can support you through it and give advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was issued on 20 August. I have acknowledged online for 28 days, so does that mean I have 28 days regardless or if I choose to just send in my finances it is still 14 days?

 

I have the doctors in the morning for the 'talk' so just trying to get that out of the way first.

 

I started to complete the form last night but got a bit in a mess, so figured will try and calm down a bit with everything that is going on then get it going. The CCA request was sent on 14th August before the papers arrived.

 

I do have defaults on my account so figure probably (don't know if I am being a bit naive here, that a CCJ is prob not the worst thing that can happen right now)

 

Can I submit a letter with the form if I do choose the route of 'admitting all' explaining my circumstances?

Link to post
Share on other sites

threads merged

 

this PPI and PENALTY charges reclaims

have you got all the statements?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

" Can I submit a letter with the form if I do choose the route of 'admitting all' explaining my circumstances? "

 

Hi Chlo

 

Within your summons pack there is a response sheet for admittance (N9A)

 

Responses to Claim Form

 

Payment in full

 

To satisfy your claim the defendant must pay the full balance of principal debt, interest, court fees and solicitors fixed costs as stated within the Claim Form.

 

Payment in part

 

If only a part payment is made, of say the principal debt, then you are entitled to proceed for the balance of the interest and costs. BUT it should be noted that if payment is received prior to the issue date then no costs could be recovered even if the claim has been requested. If payment is made on the same day as issue the court take the view that the defendant has paid without having sight of the proceedings and although we will write for the costs and interest on your behalf we do not recommend that you proceed further with the claim should payment not be forthcoming.

 

Admission debt and payment offer

 

If the defendant admits the claim in full and is asking for time to pay, either by instalment repayments or a specific date in the future, he sends the completed form to the Claimant. If you accept the offer judgment will be entered against the defendant and the court will forward a judgment order to the defendant informing them how and when to pay. If you reject the offer, perhaps you know the defendant has assets to satisfy the debt, then we will request judgment stating that the proposals are unacceptable and give the reasons why. The court will determine a rate for payment.

 

If the defendant admits part of the claim and you accept the part admission in settlement we will request judgment for that amount plus the recalculation of interest and costs allowed for that sum. If the Claimant rejects the part admission then the court will treat the matter as a defended matter.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I missing something? Would it not be better to put in a defence, after acknowledgement of service 14 days in giving you another 14 days so 28 in total before filing a defence, saying you do not owe the money and then look for an extension later on whilst they prove otherwise - citing CCA, SAR etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need to do a defence

 

you just ask the creditor for an extension to file a defence of another 28 days as to cpr 15.5

 

thats a total of 56 days allowed to file a defence

 

i myself would do directions to strike out via an unless order if they do not have the documents

 

but thats me

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...