Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4292 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I pay my Council Tax by Standing Order. As it is for 10 months, it stops in February and March and I re-activate it in April.

I have been quite ill for several months and forgot to re-activate the Standing Order in April. I never got a reminder about it but the Council wrote and said they were taking me to court.

So I paid the missing two payments for April and May and carried on paying monthly in June and July on the 1st of the month.

I got a Magistrate's Summons when it was too late to attend and I was too ill anyway.

Then I got a letter from the Council telling me a Liability Order had been granted at the Magistrate's Court on 15/06/2012, at least two weeks after I had paid for April, May and June.

Now that July's payment has gone through, I got a Bailiff's letter today from a commercial collection service saying they will come back and charge further costs and may remove my goods to pay the arrears.

As far as I can see there is no debt or arrears as my payments are up to date, but apparently I have lost the right to pay in installments.

 

I have no idea what to do or where to go. I live alone and this stress is making me ill again.

 

Any advice?

 

Thank You very much.

 

~.~

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you contacted the council or the bailiff??

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact the council, and ask them

How many liability orders they have (in your case there should be only one)

How much are they for ( this may be important as it will be likely for more than you owe, your latest payments not being deducted from the LO amount

When were they passed to the bailiff for collection

 

E mail explaining you were in hospital. are you still ill and under a doctor? if so you may well be vulnerable under the national guidelines:

 

Department for Constitutional Affairs - Enforcement - National Standards for Enforcement Agents

.

Vulnerable situations

Enforcement agents/agencies and creditors must recognise that they each have a role in ensuring that the vulnerable and socially excluded are protected and that the recovery process includes procedures agreed between the agent/agency and creditor about how such situations should be dealt with. The appropriate use of discretion is essential in every case and no amount of guidance could cover every situation, therefore the agent has a duty to contact the creditor and report the circumstances in situations where there is evidence of a potential cause for concern. If necessary, the enforcement agent will advise the creditor if further action is appropriate. The exercise of appropriate discretion is needed, not only to protect the debtor, but also the enforcement agent who should avoid taking action which could lead to accusations of inappropriate behaviour.

Enforcement agents must withdraw from domestic premises if the only person present is, or appears to be, under the age of 18; they can ask when the debtor will be home - if appropriate.

Enforcement agents must withdraw without making enquiries if the only persons present are children who appear to be under the age of 12.

Wherever possible, enforcement agents should have arrangements in place for rapidly accessing translation services when these are needed, and provide on request information in large print or in Braille for debtors with impaired sight.

Those who might be potentially vulnerable include:

'

the elderly;

'

people with a disability;

'

the seriously ill;

'

the recently bereaved;

'

single parent families;

'

pregnant women;

'

unemployed people; and,

'

those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English.

 

 

Ask the council to take this back, and copy the council leader and CEO into the email/letter, also forward it to your MP.

 

Be prepared to initiate a formal complaint with the council when they say nothing they cahn do, speak to bailiff etc. Remind them that the Standing Order has been reinstated, and you have no intention of dealing with a bailiff as no law compels you to do so, but that they cannot refuse your payments or they are breaking the law.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact the council, and ask them

How many liability orders they have (in your case there should be only one)

How much are they for ( this may be important as it will be likely for more than you owe, your latest payments not being deducted from the LO amount

When were they passed to the bailiff for collection

 

E mail explaining you were in hospital. are you still ill and under a doctor? if so you may well be vulnerable under the national guidelines:

 

Ask the council to take this back, and copy the council leader and CEO into the email/letter, also forward it to your MP.

 

Be prepared to initiate a formal complaint with the council when they say nothing they cahn do, speak to bailiff etc. Remind them that the Standing Order has been reinstated, and you have no intention of dealing with a bailiff as no law compels you to do so, but that they cannot refuse your payments or they are breaking the law.

 

OK, thanks very much, I'll copy that advice and I'll try e-mailing the department the liability order came from.

 

I don't think I'll qualify under "seriously ill", but I haven't worked since March and I'm seeing doctors regularly. I wasn't hospitalised, but my health has been failing for a long time.

 

 

When you say "Ask the council to take this back", you mean set aside the Liability Order and call off the bailiffs?

 

 

Thank you so much for the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, thanks very much, I'll copy that advice and I'll try e-mailing the department the liability order came from.

 

I don't think I'll qualify under "seriously ill", but I haven't worked since March and I'm seeing doctors regularly. I wasn't hospitalised, but my health has been failing for a long time.

 

 

When you say "Ask the council to take this back", you mean set aside the Liability Order and call off the bailiffs?

 

 

Thank you so much for the help.

 

I mean take the account back off the bailiff as you have paid up to date and are prepared to pay them, just not a scummy bailiff and a whole load of possibly ficticious fees.

 

As you are off work, are you claiming benefits,? you may be eligible for Council Tax benefit.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Baldasacoot

 

I am sorry if I appear to be critical but my advice may help others in the same position.

 

Many people on here are aware that we have a commercial business advising the public with bailiff queries. With the vast majority of enquiries that we receive it is apparent that people DO NOT WRITE LETTERS ANY LONGER. Instead, people will use twitter, text messages and FORUMS such as this one to discuss their problems but they will NOT write a simple letter.

 

In your case, after missing the payment in April you received a letter to say that you would be taken to court.

 

Some time after July you then received a summons.

 

Then, after this another letter from the council was sent to advise that they had been to court and that the court had granted a Liability Order.

 

Yesterday another letter arrived and this time it is from a bailiff.

 

Again, instead of contacting the council.....you came onto the forum to ask a query.

 

I appreciate that you have been ill but as you can see from above, you really should have at least written to the council.

 

Obtaining a Liability Order is an automated process done almost electronically. The problem that you now have is that approx £100 has already been added to your account by way of summons fee etc and, once a LO had been granted, you lose your right to pay by direct debit and the entire years council tax becomes due.

 

As long as you do not have a car outside of your home and refuse to let the bailiff into your home then the only fees that can be added to your account are just £42.50.

 

PLEASE contact the council this morning...preferably by phone and follow up with a letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I realise that contacting them sooner may have helped but I have difficulty with phone calls.

 

Thanks

 

Email backed by letter handed in and signed for in the council office is good also.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...