Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
    • Hi everyone, I received a charge certificate with a charge of £165  in April 2022 however I never received a PCN and NTO before that. I responded by requesting original PCN reissued in the hope of getting discounted rate which was refused however I was offered to pay £110. I received an Order of Recovery in May 2023 and submitted a witness statement on time by email to get the original PCN re-issued. I received a Notice of Enforcement in February 2024 I contacted TEC that I had submitted TE9 on time and they advised me to submit a late witness statement and TE7. I did as advised and also attached the original email and witness statement as proof to show that I had submitted my witness statement on time. The council disputed my late witness statement by saying that I likely received the PCN and that I did not submit a valid late witness statement without specifying why it's not valid. The court refused my late witness statement without giving any reasoning behind their decision (so much for the transparency). This is really outrageous as I did attach the proof of submitting the witness statement on time and it seems like the court just decided without looking at the case files. Can someone please advise me what should I do now? Any help is appreciated. I have attached all the documents below.   Documents.pdf
    • Will the real criminals please stand   Biden 🤣GUILTY on all counts    Come September remember Americans don’t like tax dodgers 🤣
    • You of course ignore the fact that Farage actually helped raise £100,000 so that WW11 Veterans could actually attend the celebrations    Meanwhile oh to be in France 🤣  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

intrum justica


gooser
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5583 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all. I have just received a rather formal letter from Interim Justica who claim to be acting on behalf of Ebay. The say I owe £46.84 and if I don't pay within 10 days a county court claim will be issued and I will have to pay the following:

Ebay £46.84

Court Fees £20.00

Solicitors Costs £50.00

Total Amount £116.84

I don't owe Ebay anything. They either have the wrong person or it's just a mistake. I have phoned them who told me to contact Ebay. I have had no response from numerous emails to Ebay and the 10 days are nearly up.

I know that they have put bad marks on my credit rating and they refuse to remove them.

Any advice would be fantastically appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Here's what I sent Intrum Justicia when they contacted me about an apparent eBay account:

 

RE: Alleged outstanding eBay account

Reference: xxxxx

Creditor Reference: xxxxx

 

 

To Whom It May Concern:

 

I am writing in response to your letter (copy included) of 6th October 2006 in which you claim I owe the sum of £30.73 with regards to an eBay account in my name. Please be advised that I do not have an eBay account, nor will I be paying any money to Intrum Justicia or eBay International AG.

 

Please take this as a formal warning that I do not take too kindly to un-solicited letters from companies requesting money. Your letter offers no evidence (nor does it offer to provide any) of any alleged debt/outstanding account. To put my mind at rest, as I’m sure this is all a mis-understanding, I require you furnish me with a signed agreement between eBay and myself that outlines the account you mention.

 

If you cannot/will not supply this information, I will have to make a Data Protection Act 1998 Subject Access Request in order to find out how you obtained my details, and where this alleged “debt” came from. The Subject Access Request is a legal procedure which you, by law, have to follow. I fully intend to carry out this procedure if I find the documentation you supply (at my informal request) fails to address my concerns.

 

At this time - as there is no documentation to support this claim - I am unable to assist with this matter. Please ensure that any future correspondence includes all the relevant documentation – Failure to provide this will result in me having to take legal action as I consider your efforts at money extortion to be tantamount to harassment. Please also be advised that calls to my telephone number (shown above) may be recorded.

 

Due to your lack of signed documentation between myself and the original creditor, you may formally consider this “debt” in dispute – and as such, you are not permitted to attempt collection of this money without first referring back to the original creditor. If I do not hear from you within 7 days, I shall consider this matter closed and no further correspondence will be entered into.

It's fairly agressive in it's wording, but it gets the message across.

The BidsterMeister

Helper of the hapless and hopeless...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still waiting, actually... Just outlining to them that you're no pushover is usually enough to make them cough-up some evidence, or slink off into the night. If it really is a simple case of "same name, wrong person", then you have nothing to worry about.

The BidsterMeister

Helper of the hapless and hopeless...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Just reading your post , I have had exactly the same problem - I have written a strong letter and also made a complaint against one of there employees , as to how I was spoken to.

Anyway , how did you get on?

Thank goodness I found this site!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi guys!

I am new to the forum but was browsing through when i saw this thread about intrum justicia.

I have had numerous dealings with them, in particular when Virgin Media set them onto us for supposedly failing to pay a bill- when our accounts were still active,the services still being delivered, and the money going out by direct debit!

In my experience with this company,i would strongly suggest to anyone who has dealings with them to stand your ground and fight it out if you believe you have cause to..

They are a debt collection agency amongst other things- and as such they operate as one-threatening letters,uncompasisnate call handlers etc.. whatever it takes to get YOUR money!.

I congratulate the write of the letter within this thread.Its fantastically written and a brilliant counter threat to put the wind up them.

In my experience in the past, these collection companies ppray on peoples ignorance of consumer credit law to get money out of them.In part, their operations include reliance on the naivety that not everyone they threaten will know the law or their options, and as such can be tricked or frightened into paying up.

Whats more, Intrum Justicia was last night featured on BBC Ones Watchdog, over the way that it handled supposed debt collections on behlaf of Brittania Music ltd, the online company which folded earlier this year..

The compaints highlighted within Watchdog are disturbingly identical to the cases highlighted here- Intrum Justicia sending out threatening letters, which contain no proof, or evidence of the debt. This is NOT correct!

And im glad that someone is standing up to them. The letter is FANTASTIC and will warrant a meticulous reply frm the company jobsworths rather than a standard pc generated template letter, which they send out all the time.

I will follow this thread with eagerness for the outcome!

Well done again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

I have just accessed information about Intrum Justica on the web and found this forum so first let me say hi to everyone.

 

Over the last couple of months I have received a number of demands from this company. Like other other forum users I do not owe any money to the companies concerned and I have written to Intrum Justica in strong terms informing them of this.

 

My instinct tells me that this company is using illegal tactics in an attempt to scare people into paying up when they do not owe anything. I suspect strongly that it is a complete con trick. I wonder how many people, particularly the elderly, have fallen for this and paid up out of fear.

 

I have reported the matter to the police.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi I Have Recently Received A Letter From Ij Stating That I Owe £8.00 From My Ebay Account Due Late Payment They Say It Is A Admin Charge As The Non Payment Was Paseed To Them On The 24th Of October 2008 My Cheque Cleared With Ebay On The 28th Of October In There Letter They Are Ststing Legal Proceedings Do I Pay ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi peps, i had an issue with paypal and ebay last year. i sold some wii's and xboxs which i bought in bulk to raise some cash, as we all like to do.

the items were bought by someone which was fine. a few weks went past then i get an email from paypal for a dispute against me saying the items had not been deliverd.

to cut a long story short i was conned and the buyer said he never had them, i deliverd them personaly so didnt get a signiture.

 

i argued with paypal and ebay about this but to no avail. i end up with a letter from the famous intrum justica oweing the buyer the full amount £1800. i had no why of proving that i had deliverd them so had to pay to avoid bailiffs calling which i was threatned with. i have been paying £20 a month for 9 months then when i phoned to make another payment the bill had gone up to £2600. (fell of my chair) they said it was another claim made against me. i dont even have an account anymore with ebay or paypal.

when i questioned this they said contact paypal.....i have done this numerouse times but have heard nothing back.

 

think i might just stop paying and leav it see what happens, what you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

who are intrum justica i know they are a dca but they are a new one to me.

ive just had an obnoxious p/call from them regarding mrs sopwith

they said they were trying to locate her. my answer so am i put anything for her in writing and ill forward it to her solicitor

the little girl at other end didnt have an answer to that

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...