Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help and Advice - Summons to Magistrates Unpaid Ticket.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4349 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I was a bit shocked this morn to find a summons to court in the mail... im a bit worried and very concerned as to how to deal with it.

 

I have only just seen these letters as i have been away at university, and unable to respond to the original letters from feb onwards.

 

The issue has arrsien from an unpaid ticket in feb.

 

im guessing its too late to challenge the proposed fine.... but is it also too late to settle out of court?

 

any help and advice anyone can offer ill be much obliged

 

thanks

 

Regards

 

Rich

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick reply.

 

so here is the story.

 

I booked a train ticked for early feb, and wrote down the east Midlands trains booking ref instead of the collection ref in the email. This delayed me at the ticket office as my as i sorted this out, and so i caght the next train. This is how i received the unpaid fair ticket.

 

now being a student in my final year i have been completely distracted with my final year course load, and dint deal with the unpaid fine. Stupid yes i know!

 

and so, i am here a few months down the line with a handfull of letters from them and nowa court summons, after finishing the degree and coming back home to my home address, and now i a bit of a mess!

 

the summons says under by law 18(1) if they means much to anyone?

 

is there any more information needed? and ill try to fill you in,

 

 

thanks so far

 

richard

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be Railway Bylaw 18, which covers travelling without a valid ticket. You must have been warned about this on the train by the conductor (were you given an option to pay the excess fare at the time?) and he or she must have taken your details. Now it's gone as far as a summons, you must act quickly. You can still offer to settle it out of court but you'll need to make a sensible offer, in a decent letter briefly explaining the circumstances but offering an abject apology for allowing it to get this far.

 

It helps that you did at least have a booking - if it was an Advance ticket, did you travel on the booked train or another one?

 

I would suggest that the full single fare minus what you paid for your booking would be reasonable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I booked a train ticked for early feb, and wrote down the east Midlands trains booking ref instead of the collection ref in the email. This delayed me at the ticket office as my as i sorted this out, and so i caght the next train. This is how i received the unpaid fair ticket.

 

now being a student in my final year i have been completely distracted with my final year course load, and dint deal with the unpaid fine. Stupid yes i know!

 

and so, i am here a few months down the line with a handfull of letters from them and nowa court summons, after finishing the degree and coming back home to my home address, and now i a bit of a mess!

 

the summons says under by law 18(1) if they means much to anyone?

 

is there any more information needed? and ill try to fill you in,

 

 

 

The terms & conditions of these special price, reduced fare tickets make absolutely clear that if they are not used on the train for which they are booked, then they have no value and a new ticket must be bought. Before anyone jumps to the inevitable conclusion, I am not saying this is always morally justified, I am just pointing out what terms the purchaser accepted when buying the ticket.

 

 

 

You can still offer to settle it out of court but you'll need to make a sensible offer, in a decent letter briefly explaining the circumstances but offering an abject apology for allowing it to get this far.

 

It helps that you did at least have a booking - if it was an Advance ticket, did you travel on the booked train or another one?

 

I would suggest that the full single fare minus what you paid for your booking would be reasonable.

 

 

 

If the OP decides not to go to Court and fight the charge on the basis that s/he had bought a ticket, albeit not for the train used, that suggestion could be worth a try, but is almost certain to be rejected by the TOC. After all, they will point out that they have had the cost of writing several letters to the OP in an effort to help him/her to settle this, which they didn't need to do. They could have gone straight to issue a summons when the OP didn't answer the Notice.

 

I am sorry if it seems uncharitable, but the staff that deal with these matters have heard all the excuses time and again, but whether studying hard or not, between February and July there has been ample time to respond to this. These staff are unlikely to believe that you have not had a half-hour free time in over 4 months and that you have not had contact with home, especially as the Easter break fell in that time. This isn't meant to be overly critical of the OP, but I hope it does illustrate the sort of commonsense thinking that I would expect to prevail in that office.

 

I suggest that an apology, and offer of the outstanding sum plus a contribution to the TOCs admin charges will be likely to get a better result.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...