Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

'Lewis' Field representative visit on CCJ/CO Northern Rock Shortfall


Mr Worried
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2873 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry, i missed this thread completly,right ajourned with liberty to restore,this order is made where the judge makes no final decision about the possession claim,instead the whole claim for possession is suspended unless either you or the lender ask for it to be restored for another hearing,many judges will ask for the claim to be dismissed after about a year if no side asks for it to be restored,so in short N.R,s reps are looking for a suspended possession order on the condition you keep up an agreed payment plan with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 187
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

appologies to the site team and anyone else following this thread concerning the number of pm,s,with this thread i know the idea is to keep as much info as possible on the open forum however im sure we would all agree that sometimes there are issues which are better left private,mr worried has got all paperwork and statement in order so should be fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hi mr worried,sorry to read that things havn,t worked out since the suspended repo order,sounds as though the past couple of years have been an uphill struggle to say the least and i know from the previous threads you have done all you could to stay in your home,but it sounds as though your at the "enough is enough" stage and want shot of the place and after all that struggling and juggling debts around who can blame you.

 

Due to the past history i cannot see a court allowing you the time to sell on the open market,lets face it you would be starting from scratch again with a new estate agent,plus the fact its been on the market 3 years makes it unlikely you would be given that option.On the other hand you also dont want it repossessed by the court either,you can bet it would go for a pittance at auction but as it stands at the moment thats the most likely outcome in my opinion,the only way i can see to stop a repo is if you can show the judge you have a buyer at the hearing,you caught between a rock and a hard place and thus your options a very limited ,so here,s what i would do if i were in your position.

 

You have a rental property to move into albeit in December,although it pains me to say it i would take the companies offer that you have been in touch with and ask for a 56 day postponment of the eviction order untill the sale goes through,this option would give you 56 days which would buy you the time to move into the rental property and tie up any loose ends .This is what i would be applying for on the n244 form and to be honest i think you would get that,in your present position thats what i would do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...