Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

'Lewis' Field representative visit on CCJ/CO Northern Rock Shortfall


Mr Worried
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Is there a difference between a court hearing for Possession and / or Repossession its probs a silly question and I know the answer but I ask because I have just recieved some paperwork re my court appearence on Monday 6th Dec, hence the title O M G.

 

Mr Very Worried at the momment however I am sure that will change in the next few hrs.

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 187
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think a hearing for Possession is when they decide when to repossess you, either way you have a right to attend, challenge the figures and put your defence, especially if you have young children who will be affected by changing schools midway through the shchool year.....

 

NMR are known to be aggressive on repos, and you can also argue that their business model was not designed for them to have mortgages going the full term. There is some case law on this now but can't remember the name.

 

Good luck. PM me if you need to sound off....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SG

 

This is so much more hassle than I expected, and all because of the mail recieved, so basically they could get possession and a date to evict?

 

 

 

I think a hearing for Possession is when they decide when to repossess you, either way you have a right to attend, challenge the figures and put your defence, especially if you have young children who will be affected by changing schools midway through the shchool year.....

 

NMR are known to be aggressive on repos, and you can also argue that their business model was not designed for them to have mortgages going the full term. There is some case law on this now but can't remember the name.

 

Good luck. PM me if you need to sound off....

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

I have eventually got to speak to the courts re Adjournment, they say get something in writing today and maybe a judge will adjourn, if not then first thing Monday he may he may not.

 

The only grounds I have for an adjournment will be that NR have not responded to my request for a arrears breakdown, and that I have only recieved possession papers today, although I knew I was at court,

 

Maybe some of this is my fault as I thought it would be a simple defence ( NR Advice ) they told me they wanted to secure an order so that in the future if I missed a payment then they could take the house of me?

 

Basically what do you think is best way forward so I can implement and be able to sleep. I dont mind facing this head on, on Monday but just feel it needs tweeked?

 

Mr..erm... Worried

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

 

Just reading through POC and it states arrears are £2938.00 and on an account summary it states £925.07. are solicitors charges? for being instructed to take action? all the paperwork has different figures?

 

 

On the POC in the last sentance it says...In view of the ammount of arrears herin that have accrued due I ask this honourable court to make a full order for possession against the defendants and the money claim adjourned generally with liberty to restore.??????????

 

Any Ideas

 

Mr W

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Flagged for team Mr.W.

Please bear with us.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr.W-just to let you know we didnt forget.

Ell-en has been unavailable due to commitments,but I understand will try to take a look on her return.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, i missed this thread completly,right ajourned with liberty to restore,this order is made where the judge makes no final decision about the possession claim,instead the whole claim for possession is suspended unless either you or the lender ask for it to be restored for another hearing,many judges will ask for the claim to be dismissed after about a year if no side asks for it to be restored,so in short N.R,s reps are looking for a suspended possession order on the condition you keep up an agreed payment plan with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi News starter

 

Music to my ears, but are you sure? I have been to court twice before re a secured loan on the property and got is susspended on both occasions.

 

I just feel nervous about tommorow at 3 pm, NR told me that they would want an order so that if I missed payment then they could repossess, just as you have explaine within your reply above?

 

Hi 3030 I too was aware that ell-enn was away from her cag desk and she's gonna try and catch up with this thread, SG has been helping too, and I am very gratefull for the input, I just cant help worrying that because I still have nothing in place ie ..( i+e, statement ).

 

Mr Agitated bordering on the fringes of lunacy.

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr W, PM'd draft statement to you - waiting for you to come back to me.

 

Hi sg, seen pm, ta very much. I will speak to you all in the morning, or tonight if you wish, as I will not be able to sleep.

 

Mr

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

So I am about to do statement, although I have had differing ideas about a statement I am still bl+++y unsure, so I am going to take a softly approach to this statement and not mention all the 'they said this, they said that' ( Northen Rock ).

 

I will basically tell them that in June I went from Interest only payment method to repayment which increased £338.00 per month I was unemployed at the time and effectivley still am ( Till Jan 11 ) I am commited to repaying arrears along with the additional £50.00/ £100 per month on top of repayment figure. Although I am still not working ( do I tell them that ?) I can pay £1000.00 by Monday 13th Dec ( do I tell them that ?) and my future payment going forward will be ' on time ' please consider the fact that I have two children at home 9 and 7 yrs. and I would like to draw your attention to the case of Cheltenham & Glouceser v Norgan to be taken into account.

 

Could some body put that into a statement please?

 

Mr Hurried

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

appologies to the site team and anyone else following this thread concerning the number of pm,s,with this thread i know the idea is to keep as much info as possible on the open forum however im sure we would all agree that sometimes there are issues which are better left private,mr worried has got all paperwork and statement in order so should be fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Well after sleepness nights, arguments with Mrs W, and hrs spent researching what ifs,It got SUSSPENDED. I got chucked about the court room a little bit by claimants solicitor but kept calm and re-iterated my side of the story, end of.

 

I would like to say a MASSIVE THANKYOU to silly girl who has been by my side over the weekend ( not literally ) and to newstarter for his calming words.

 

That was my 7th time in court with differing matters all assited by cag and the members, and every time we have ( won ) so raise a glass to you all and lets keep helping one another.

 

I would like to raise a glass myself but I dont drink during the week Ha Ha.

 

Speak soon on another thread, till then THANKS SO MUCH

 

Mr Happy

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This must be a bit of a relief, was their solicitor a 'little boy' or 'little girl' one? They liek to trow about legal stuff but when faced with bare fact tend to flounder, hence my stance of keeping it short, sweet and not letting them get their oar in.

 

Well done for hanging in there.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...