Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • DX: Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4170 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, i'm after some advice regarding a council tax debt which was given to the bailiffs.

 

After getting behind with our council tax payments, equita bailiffs took the debt over and I set up a agreement to pay £40 a week by direct debit (this was over the phone with the call centre before it had gone as far as a bailiff visit) Stupidly it was my choice to pay £40 and the operator told me i could pay as little as £5 a week if i chose.

 

Anyway, we carried on paying the £40 a week for about 6 weeks and then my partner had no work (he was self employed decorator) so I called asking to lower our payments to £20 a week untill my partner had secured more work.

The operator told me this was not possible, leaving me with no choice but to cancel the direct debit with the bank as i didnt have the funds available.

I then recieved a letter from equita stating they were sending a bailiff out when i tried to call to set up another payment plan it just gave me the phone number of the bailiff who was going to come round.

 

After trying to call him several times with no answer i went onto equitas website and paid £20 off the £528.08 balance (which was all i could afford) After several days a bailiff called (at 7am) and luckily my partner, my children and myself were upstairs so didnt answer the door. After several atempts at knocking the door he posted a letter and drove off.

The letter stated that full payment was due in 24hours or he will re-attend and may remove goods even in my absence. With the letter there was also a 'form seven'- notice of seizure and inventory of goods, this had my mothers car regestration on (her car was parked on the road outside my house).

At the bottom of the form it stated the amount of owing council tax was £528.08 (remember i payed the £20) The bailiff costs were then £209.00 setting the total amount due at £737.08!!!!

Luckily my grandmother was willing to lend me the money as i'm 39 weeks pregnant and was totally freaked out.

I did not agree with the charges and pointed this out to the bailiff when i called to pay him, i also queried the £20 i payed. He put me on hold to speak to his 'manager' when he came back to the phone he told me i had to pay the full balance of £737.08 and then write to the legal department of equita to see if i'm eligable to claim the wrong charges back. Can someone please help me as i've read the bailiff fees can only £24 or something similar as he has only visited once and never gained entry, and although he has done an inventry it doesnt include anything belonging to me?? Please help, thanks :)

Edited by seanamarts
edited to make a little easier on the eyes
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi welcome to CAG

 

you should claim the fees back from the local authority its there levy the bailiff Levy's on behalf of the local authority

 

will your mum give you a photo copy of the V5 (having said that Equita can do a dvla check to confirm ownership )

 

Have a read of this

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?262730-Has-a-bailiff-quot-levied-quot-upon-a-car-that-is-NOT-owned-by-you-...-LOCAL-GOVERNMENT-OMBUDSMAN-S-Report-!!!!

 

 

is the £209.00 bailiffs broken down to explain what fees you have been charged as in

 

fees to date £42,50 (this will be 1st and 2nd visit fees)

levy fee £42

these are the fees you should have been charged had the levy been valid (your car)

 

Is the bailiff certificated to Equita

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?210956-On-line-search-to-check-if-a-Bailiff-is-Certificated.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, thanks for your reply. I have just checked and yes the bailiff is certified. The £209.00 has not been broken down, however he was in a van so maybe he has charged for that although reading through a schedule of charges bailiffs are allowed to make, charging for a van can only be done when returning with intention to remove goods after a levy has been made. This was the first time the bailiff has called to the house. When paying the bailiff over the phone he gave me the name and address of the lady at equita who i should write to with my query, should i write to her or the council or both? When i called the council before i payed they told me that they did not deal with charges or the fact my mothers car had been put down as ours and i should speak with equita! I'm totally confused what to do now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To get things on the right foot you need to start at the begining and build your case.

 

Start with the Council and with pen at the ready get answers to the following:

 

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

 

Next you need to get a breakdown of the dubious fees this bailiff thinks he can charge and to do that you need to write and ask:

 

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

Ref: Account No: 123456

Dear Sir

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were Certificated at.

e - the date of the Certification.

 

This is not a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

I require this information within 14 days.

Yours faithfully

Ripped off customer"

 

As Hallow has said you will need to get a copy of the V5 to show the car does not belong to you, but first get the above and come back here and then caggers will guide you the course to get back those illegal fees.

 

WD

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you cannot find out if the bailiff is certificated then please PM me his name and I will find out for you.

 

I would start complaining to the council as they have made an unlawful levy on your mothers car.

 

As HW has stated you owe for two visits £42.40

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, i'm really not good with things like this, half the words used i don't have a clue of their meaning.

 

I will copy that letter requesting a breakdown of fees in the morning, thanks for that, its a great help as usually when writing letters i sit for about an hour with a blank piece of paper not knowing what to write!!

 

Also how can they charge me for two visits?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will almost certainly have an "attendance with a vehicle with a view to remove goods" charge.

 

When/if you get a breakdown of fees, this will probably be described as a "van" fee, "attendance" fee or something similar.

 

As you have already been advised, this fee (if charged) and the levy on your mother's car will be invalid. They may have also included a "Head H" fee; if so, this too will be invalid.

 

Something to note regarding the "van" fee (if charged).

 

Even if they had made a valid levy, i.e. it was your vehicle. The bailiff will have added this fee (van) speculatively, as he would not have known what goods to remove – there was no prior levy.

 

As defined in the regulations, the attendance must be made “with a view to the removal of goods” so an enforcement agent would need to arrive in, say, a removal van for example, if bulky items such as furniture were to be listed on the Notice of Seizure, or a breakdown recovery truck, if a vehicle was intended to be levied.

 

Essentially the bailiff would need to be attending with a vehicle for the purpose of removing goods; the fee would only be lawful following a valid levy, where under normal circumstances, goods had been seized on a previous visit.

 

Contracts between enforcement firms and authorities would in general be breached if a bailiff were to attend with the view to levying distress, and removing goods, both on the same visit.

 

Even if conditions detailed in the Service Level Agreement allowed it; if the bailiff wanted to "Levy & Remove Immediately", the bailiff on his first visit would need to arrive with sufficient transport - vans etc, to remove the goods (unknown) he was intending to levy on that visit.

 

He had no idea what goods he was going to seize, he seized a vehicle, he did not turn up in a tow-truck, so could not have attended with the view to remove goods following the levy.

Edited by outlawla
Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with outlawla, attend to levy come in Berlingo, cannot add attending to remove fee if he levies a house full of goods, in any case many levies fall due to exempt items being seized like children's beds, toys etc,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoke to south oxfodshire council and the balance is still £495.08 (I only payed the bailiff 2 days ago and the lady from the council said it could take 10days to clear) The thing i'm stuck on is that the council are saying £495.08 but the bailiff company are saying i owed £528.08. I am going to go through my bank statements now as i have always paid equita by debit card or direct debit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that council info. I have just phoned the council again and asked for the starting balance, which was £1030.00, I have gone through all my bank statements which shows i've paid £602.00 which means the remaining balance should have been £428.00 not the £495.08 which is the figure the council have or the £528.08 which equita have!!

 

I have phoned equita who have told me that since they've had this case there have been six different bailiffs in charge of it and I have incurred a total amount of £307 in fees! Anyway, the lady on the phone told me she will get her manager to send me out a breakdown of these charges, although I have posted a copy of wonkeydonkeys template letter requesting all the details this morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also suspect your Council has outsourced its admin functions to a company called Capita, they in turn own a company called Equita - can you see where we are going?

 

Yes it's the CrapQuita duo. Also seem to share revenues & benefit services with the Vale of White Horse District Council.

 

Hall of shame: South Oxfordshire Council pursue an 80-year-old man for money he did not owe.

Edited by outlawla
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on, if you are pregnant and there are young children then you are vulnerable and the council are at fault for sending bailiffs round - you need to let the council know this pronto.

 

You also need to check to see if their assessment is correct, and that you are getting the correct benefits

 

http://www.turn2us.org.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, okay so this morning i received a reply from equita with a breakdown of my account. It went like this:

 

Debt: £1030.00

Statutory visit fees: £24.50- 30/08/11

Levy fees: £41.00- 12/06/12

Enforcement fees: £167.00- 12/06/12

Card charges: £21.00

Unpaid direct Debit: £65.28- 04/01/12 & 27/04/12

 

TOTAL £1348.78

 

IThere is then a huge list of of payments i've made from 14/09/11 when the account first went to them all the way up to the final payment i made of £734.08 on 12/06/12 to stop any further action.

 

I have checked all the payments against my bank statements and they are all there. I'm not sure where i need to go next with this as from what i've read they cannot charge the levy fee or enforcement fee as they never gained access and made a llevy on a car thats neither my partners nor mine. Also i dont know what the card charge is about as all the payments were collected by direct debit except 3 which were paid by card which they charge £1 for card payment which are shown on the amounts received by me. Also there were two occasions where the funds wernt in my bank to cover the direct debit but can they really charge me £65.28 for these occasions?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt: £1030.00

Statutory visit fees: £24.50- 30/08/11 OK

levy fees: £41.00- 12/06/12 incorrect levy, no charge

Enforcement fees: £167.00- 12/06/12 Cannot charge as incorrect levy

Card charges: £21.00 Cannot charge for

Unpaid direct debit: £65.28- 04/01/12 & 27/04/12 Cannot charge for this, no where does it state that they can charge a fee for this.

 

the only fee that you owe is for the first and second visit of £42.50.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the bailiff had levied your mother's car, apart from the levy being invalid (making the levy fee and attendance fee void), the bailiff has charged these fees on the same visit.

 

Even if it was detailed in the council's Service Level Agreement (which it wouldn't), a bailiff wishing to "Levy and Remove" on the same visit and incur those fees, would need to arrive with sufficient transport - vans etc, to remove the goods it anticipated distraining upon.

 

In your case the bailiff levied on a vehicle, he would need to prove that he had arrived in transport sufficiently capable of safely removing the vehicle. A point worth remembering for anyone else incurring both these fees in respect of the same attendance.

 

This is not only relevant for levy and attending to remove fees made on the same visit, it also applies to attending to remove in general. If they haven't arrived in suitable transportation and incurred that cost themselves, they will be attempting to defraud you by imposing it, and actually defrauding you if they are paid it.

Edited by outlawla
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, from all the posts last week I was quite sure that the charges were unfair, I just don't really know where to take it from here. Do you think there is anyway I can claim the fees and charges back even though I have paid them all? I did dispute them with the bailiff when I called to pay but he said all action against me would continue, I had to pay it to stop action and then take it up with equita's legal team?? I really wish I hadn't paid it now but as I'm due to give birth tomorrow I was getting myself into such a state that my grandmother gave us the money to pay it off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, from all the posts last week I was quite sure that the charges were unfair, I just don't really know where to take it from here. Do you think there is anyway I can claim the fees and charges back even though I have paid them all? I did dispute them with the bailiff when I called to pay but he said all action against me would continue, I had to pay it to stop action and then take it up with equita's legal team?? I really wish I hadn't paid it now but as I'm due to give birth tomorrow I was getting myself into such a state that my grandmother gave us the money to pay it off!

 

Surely the bailiff could see you were in the final trimester of pregnancy, and therefore potentially vulnerable, once you have the new baby safely delivered, and you have settled you could start Formal Complaint procedures and copy your MP into them. For the moment you should try to relax, and enjoy your new arrival when he or she arrives. good luck, and post back when you are ready.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you :D

 

I was upstairs with my two children (it was 7.30am) and didn't answer the door so he never saw me. When I explained to him on the phone I was less than 2 weeks off giving birth he just started talking about his pregnant girlfriend??

 

What should be my next step? Should I write to equita's legal department? The bailiff gave me the name of the lady who is the head of legal and the address, if so I'm totally clueless on what to write (I'm awful at letters etc)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...