Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good morning all, No further communication with P2G so now submitting my small claims action. Would be grateful for any feedback on my description of claim before I submit later. The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper containing two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was informed that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks was informed by Evri that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The claimant therefore seeks £370 in respect to the value of goods plus court costs. I thought it might be better to use the CRA rather than the Supply of Goods and Services Act as we are sole traders - is this correct?
    • No new development, I'm afraid. The last update I received was a letter from the court, advising that the case had been transferred to Croydon County Court.
    • Read how your orgnisation can make opportunities and employment more accessible for disadvantaged young people.View the full article
    • Hi, I am aware there’s been few threads about this already but just wanted to confirm information on my case. I was with Village gym last year(2023) on initial 6 month usual contract they do, I lost my job and due to that I couldn’t afford to pay for gym nor I had any motivation to go to gym at that time so they sent me arc phone message in September 2023 that I owed them £140 so I paid them back on instalments in 2 months time.  Then I started receiving new years deals in December 2023 and I decided to give them a call but they never mentioned anything about 6 month contract or anything, only that it would be monthly rolling contract and I paid them for 2 months and then I realised both months they charged me £59 instead of £38 they offered me on the phone when I mentioned that I am still student, even though before I was paying £43 a month in mid 2023. I spoke to gym entrance lady and she said I should give a call to gym on the phone number so I did and whoever answered said they’ll pass my info to manager and he will give me a call back in 24 hours, of course no one called me back so I called again and they said same thing. And of course once again no one got in touch with me so I got tired of them charging me more than they should and decided to cancel my direct debit and stopped going there as I got new job with rotation shifts which is not good for me as I cannot visit gym after I finish at 10pm every second week.  And now in April I received arc message saying this :  Also they have my old flat address where I used to live. What is the  best thing to do for me please? Thank you!
    • Richard Holden refusing ro answer Jon Craig's questions in a Sky pool interview and his spad argiung about the questions. As Jon said, not his finest hour.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ex Employer being awkward about paying money owed......


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4399 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Hope someone can offer advice.

 

My husband left his old job on 20th March after being on long term sick.

He was no longer receiving any sick pay from them but on his final pay he was due to receive a months outstanding holiday pay for which the amount had been confirmed by his ex employers.

When this was paid to him they had deducted almost £700 as they stated he had been overpaid for March, even though he only got a grand total of £35 for that month.

Anyway after a lot of arguing and spreadsheets being drawn up, someone high up in payroll looked at it for him and agreed not only had they incorrectly deducted the holiday pay, they had also underpaid him on 3 other occasions during the past year!

They asked for him to return his P45 and final payslip so these could be amended and the money refunded to him.

He sent back the top part of his P45 and original payslip and they have got in touch saying they need all 3 parts of the P45 before they can refund the money they owe, but this isn't possible because they were handed to the Job centre to claim Job-seekers allowance.

 

Are they just finding excuses to mess him around or do they need his complete P45 before reworking his final payslip?

 

Thanks

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically yes they do; the P45 is a 4 part form and all parts have to contain the same information.

However, once the P45 has been issued they can't recall it. What they should do is write you a letter on company notepaper giving details if the amended amounts.

Speak to payroll and refer them to the CWG 2 employers further guide to PAYE and NI as the instructions are contained in there. They can download it from HMRC website if they don't have a paper copy.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply my husband will let them know this tomorrow.

 

This is the email he got from them earlier today -

 

Hi Mr ******

 

We have received Part 1A of your P45 today, but unfortunately we require all parts issued, (3&4) if we are to rework your payslip and send out an amended P45.

 

If you could return to us at your earliest convenience.

 

regards

*********

 

So I can only assume what they say here is wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply my husband will let them know this tomorrow.

 

This is the email he got from them earlier today -

 

Hi Mr ******

 

We have received Part 1A of your P45 today, but unfortunately we require all parts issued, (3&4) if we are to rework your payslip and send out an amended P45.

 

If you could return to us at your earliest convenience.

 

regards

*********

 

So I can only assume what they say here is wrong?

 

Hello there.

 

I think you can assume Gbarbm knows her stuff. :) If they disagree with you, you can always refer them to HMRC's helpline or their normal contact.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes page 11 of the CWG 2 is quite clear... If the employee has already left and adjustments are made to the P45, a duplicate P45 cannot be prepared/issued.

The reason for this is that a P45 can be used for repayment purposes.

Your hubby could google CWG 2, copy and paste the section on page 11 and put it on a response e mail to the employer and see what they come back with

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could tell a few things about some large well known companies that would make your hair curl!

As the saying goes; you're only as strong as your weakest link, most of whom seem to be in payroll and HR

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Got the following email back from payroll today after having sent them advice regarding CWG 2 -

 

 

Hi

 

Yes this is correct, we must not issue another P45, if payments are made after leaving as your payslip will reflect the Tax and NI paid. We would then have to tax you on OTM1 code which means you would not be entitled to any tax allowance

 

However we are intending to rework your last payslip and cancel your P45 and reissue an amended P45 and payslip, therefore we will be able to use your tax allowance when calculating the underpayment. This will be financially better for you.

 

Please confirm which method you would prefer us to use. If it is the latter then we will need parts 3 and 4 of your P45 returned to us.

 

Regards

 

Surely they know his tax allowance from the payslip and part 1 of his P45 that was returned to them?

 

Are they just messing him around or does what they say make sense?

 

Thanks for any help

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see what they are trying to do, but the point at issue is that DWP will not give you the copies they hold as it is not correct for them to do so.

The monies your hubby is due constitute a payment after date of leaving and must be treated in the way described in the CWG2.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what he pointed out to them but they still came back with this!

He's emailed them again stating they should have all the relevant details regarding his tax code etc it's just getting really frustrating now and feel they are just going out their way to be awkward :-x

Is their anyone who he can officially complain to about their conduct in handling this refund bearing in mind he no longer works for them?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

In all honesty, they realise they have, for want of a better phrase "cocked up" and are trying to do some damage limitation in order to mitigate their error.

They probably realise that this error will be picked up on an internal audit and they will get it in the neck.

The best that can be achieved based on the existing circumstances is this;

 

1) the ex employer should pay the monies to your hubby and provide details of the date the amount was paid, the gross amount due, the tax code operated and the net amount.

 

2) Code BR(or 0T) should be operated by the employer, this will deduct tax at 20p in the pound

 

3) once full details of your husbands income are held, which will comprise the P60 from the employer he was with at 5 April (if your hubby was in receipt of JSA a P60U will be issued) and the letter regarding the monies paid from the ex employer; your hubby should pass the details to his tax office which will be the one that dealt with the previous employer, they will then deal with any refund of tax due.

 

If you need details of the tax office address, come back to me on here and I can provide them.

Edited by Gbarbm
spelling errors

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your help!

My husband basically copy and pasted your last post into an email and today they've got back saying they've processed the payment under code OTM1 Looks like they needed your advice to know what to do!

 

Thanks again

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs, glad it's sorted, just keep all the paperwork safe as he will need it to claim a refund of income tax for the period from 6 April 2011 to 5 April 2012

 

Kind regards

 

Gbarbm

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...