Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ex Employer being awkward about paying money owed......


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4399 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Hope someone can offer advice.

 

My husband left his old job on 20th March after being on long term sick.

He was no longer receiving any sick pay from them but on his final pay he was due to receive a months outstanding holiday pay for which the amount had been confirmed by his ex employers.

When this was paid to him they had deducted almost £700 as they stated he had been overpaid for March, even though he only got a grand total of £35 for that month.

Anyway after a lot of arguing and spreadsheets being drawn up, someone high up in payroll looked at it for him and agreed not only had they incorrectly deducted the holiday pay, they had also underpaid him on 3 other occasions during the past year!

They asked for him to return his P45 and final payslip so these could be amended and the money refunded to him.

He sent back the top part of his P45 and original payslip and they have got in touch saying they need all 3 parts of the P45 before they can refund the money they owe, but this isn't possible because they were handed to the Job centre to claim Job-seekers allowance.

 

Are they just finding excuses to mess him around or do they need his complete P45 before reworking his final payslip?

 

Thanks

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically yes they do; the P45 is a 4 part form and all parts have to contain the same information.

However, once the P45 has been issued they can't recall it. What they should do is write you a letter on company notepaper giving details if the amended amounts.

Speak to payroll and refer them to the CWG 2 employers further guide to PAYE and NI as the instructions are contained in there. They can download it from HMRC website if they don't have a paper copy.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply my husband will let them know this tomorrow.

 

This is the email he got from them earlier today -

 

Hi Mr ******

 

We have received Part 1A of your P45 today, but unfortunately we require all parts issued, (3&4) if we are to rework your payslip and send out an amended P45.

 

If you could return to us at your earliest convenience.

 

regards

*********

 

So I can only assume what they say here is wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply my husband will let them know this tomorrow.

 

This is the email he got from them earlier today -

 

Hi Mr ******

 

We have received Part 1A of your P45 today, but unfortunately we require all parts issued, (3&4) if we are to rework your payslip and send out an amended P45.

 

If you could return to us at your earliest convenience.

 

regards

*********

 

So I can only assume what they say here is wrong?

 

Hello there.

 

I think you can assume Gbarbm knows her stuff. :) If they disagree with you, you can always refer them to HMRC's helpline or their normal contact.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes page 11 of the CWG 2 is quite clear... If the employee has already left and adjustments are made to the P45, a duplicate P45 cannot be prepared/issued.

The reason for this is that a P45 can be used for repayment purposes.

Your hubby could google CWG 2, copy and paste the section on page 11 and put it on a response e mail to the employer and see what they come back with

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could tell a few things about some large well known companies that would make your hair curl!

As the saying goes; you're only as strong as your weakest link, most of whom seem to be in payroll and HR

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Got the following email back from payroll today after having sent them advice regarding CWG 2 -

 

 

Hi

 

Yes this is correct, we must not issue another P45, if payments are made after leaving as your payslip will reflect the Tax and NI paid. We would then have to tax you on OTM1 code which means you would not be entitled to any tax allowance

 

However we are intending to rework your last payslip and cancel your P45 and reissue an amended P45 and payslip, therefore we will be able to use your tax allowance when calculating the underpayment. This will be financially better for you.

 

Please confirm which method you would prefer us to use. If it is the latter then we will need parts 3 and 4 of your P45 returned to us.

 

Regards

 

Surely they know his tax allowance from the payslip and part 1 of his P45 that was returned to them?

 

Are they just messing him around or does what they say make sense?

 

Thanks for any help

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see what they are trying to do, but the point at issue is that DWP will not give you the copies they hold as it is not correct for them to do so.

The monies your hubby is due constitute a payment after date of leaving and must be treated in the way described in the CWG2.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what he pointed out to them but they still came back with this!

He's emailed them again stating they should have all the relevant details regarding his tax code etc it's just getting really frustrating now and feel they are just going out their way to be awkward :-x

Is their anyone who he can officially complain to about their conduct in handling this refund bearing in mind he no longer works for them?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

In all honesty, they realise they have, for want of a better phrase "cocked up" and are trying to do some damage limitation in order to mitigate their error.

They probably realise that this error will be picked up on an internal audit and they will get it in the neck.

The best that can be achieved based on the existing circumstances is this;

 

1) the ex employer should pay the monies to your hubby and provide details of the date the amount was paid, the gross amount due, the tax code operated and the net amount.

 

2) Code BR(or 0T) should be operated by the employer, this will deduct tax at 20p in the pound

 

3) once full details of your husbands income are held, which will comprise the P60 from the employer he was with at 5 April (if your hubby was in receipt of JSA a P60U will be issued) and the letter regarding the monies paid from the ex employer; your hubby should pass the details to his tax office which will be the one that dealt with the previous employer, they will then deal with any refund of tax due.

 

If you need details of the tax office address, come back to me on here and I can provide them.

Edited by Gbarbm
spelling errors

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your help!

My husband basically copy and pasted your last post into an email and today they've got back saying they've processed the payment under code OTM1 Looks like they needed your advice to know what to do!

 

Thanks again

Lisa

Link to post
Share on other sites

No probs, glad it's sorted, just keep all the paperwork safe as he will need it to claim a refund of income tax for the period from 6 April 2011 to 5 April 2012

 

Kind regards

 

Gbarbm

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...