Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4389 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there.

I'm in a bit of trouble and I'm really hoping that I can get some advice as to where I stand.

 

Firstly, I know I've been stupid, ignoring debts and letting them build up to a point where I've got no hope of settling them. I've never been very good with money. I know that's no excuse.

 

Ok, here goes...

I'm in arrears with my council tax to the tune of £4436.78

I've got five seperate accounts that break down as follows-

 

1) £1252.65

2) £670.20

3) £707.47

4) £526.87

5) £1279.59

 

A couple of months ago, I recieved a notice from the council that I had 14 days to pay the total amount, or they would start court proceedings to have the bailiffs recover the money. I've no way at all of getting that kind of money together and, stupidly, I carried on with the same old, tried and failed, ignore it and it'll go away policy. Needless to say, it didn't and a few weeks later, Jacobs bailiffs put a letter through the door, or I should say five letters stuffed into one envelope, demanding either payment in full within seven days or that I would need to let the bailiff into my house to work out a payment schedule.

 

The letter made it very clear that there was no way they would enter into an agreement unless I Let the bailiff in and paid him £50 on the spot. I didn't have fifty pounds to pay him, so I ignored the letter.

 

A week or so later, the bailiff turned up again and, feeling worn down and pretty bloody embarrased, I let him in. I know I shouldn't have let him in and If I could go back, after reading this forum, I'd have opened the letter box and told him to go away, But I didn't.

 

Anyway, Once he was in the house, he was fairly polite but wouldn't budge on his insisted installments of £60 per week. I explained my personal circumstances to him, explained that I would struggle to pay that kind of money each week, but he just shrugged and said he'd have to take my stuff if I didn't accept his terms.

 

I agreed to the payments and he asked me what valuables I own. He said he didn't like searching people's houses for stuff, so I gave him a list of things. Thing is, the house is rented fully furnished, so I don't own any furniture. My TV is rented also. So basically, he made a list that contained an ancient plasma screen TV ( one of the first ones out, no digital reciever or HD or anything like that) that's worth probably no more than £50 on a good day at an auction, an ancient dvd player that's probably worth a fiver at best, a battered old laptop that might be worth £30, a cheap ipod dock that was only £20 new and my car. The car is a 9 year old Mondeo with 165k on the clock and a load of mechanical issues. I'd be amazed if it fetched more than three or four hundred pounds at auction (webuyanycar offered me £500 for it...).

 

I knew I wouldn't be able to afford the payments, and sure enough, a month after signing the agreement, I missed a payment.

 

I've had five new letters this morning, all demanding payment in full within four days or they would come to take my stuff. I phoned the number on the letter, to be greeted by a fairly sour sounding woman who had no interest whatsoever. She told me, basically, that if I don't pay the smallest account (£526.87) by Saturday, they'd come at some point next week to take the stuff. I explained to her that, in total, my belongings would fetch a few hundred pounds at best, but she just said "there's a car on the list sir". Yes, I said, but it's a battered old thing that's not worth anything. Needless to say, she wasn't bothered in the slightest.

 

Now, the reason that these arrears started to build, is that when the whole credit crunch thing hit, my wages took a huge nosedive. I was working two and three day weeks for at least a couple of years in a job that didn't pay that well for the full five days. My first child was born in 06, so money was tight enough anyway. Then in 2010, I was diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis in my hands, legs and back, which made it almost impossible to carry on working. I tried to claim benefits, but was awarded £6 a week, which was stopped after six weeks because my girlfriend's working tax credits took our income over the "poverty threshold" and £18 a week DLA.

Anyway, even though I knew I couldn't afford to do it, I kind of budgeted to use the tax credit money to pay the bailiff. Then, two weeks ago, they stopped paying working tax credit and we lost out on £70 a week. That's basically why I couldn't cover the £60 payments to Jacobs. They don't care about that though.

 

So, basically, I'm at the point where I have a girlfriend working 16 hours a week on just above minimum wage, a five year old and a two year old eating me out of house and home, an illness that's not showing any signs of getting better any time soon, a huge reduction in income and a bailiff threatening to come and take my car if I don't give them five hundred pounds by the end of the week.

 

Add to that the fact that if they take the car, my girlfriend won't be able to work as she needs to be able to get to places like Blackburn, Bolton, etc during the day as part of her job, so we'll be in even more trouble money wise, and, the car itself would probably only cover the cost of the fees for taking and selling it in the first place, leaving me with the same amount of debt, but even less chance of being able to pay it!

 

I'm going to go to the CAB tomorrow morning and see what they say, but after spending the afternoon/evening reading this forum, I thought I'd see if anybody could offer any advice here.

 

Is there any chance at all of getting them to leave my car alone and accept a drastically reduced installment plan? Or have I left it too late to do anything about it?

 

Feels like I'm going a bit mad at the minute:|

 

 

Thanks in advance for any help offered and I'm sorry the post is a long one. Hopefully nobody falls asleep reading it...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vulnerable Situations

Enforcement agents/agencies and creditors must recognise

that they each have a role in ensuring that the vulnerable

 

and socially excluded are protected and that the recovery

 

process includes procedures agreed between the

 

agent/agency and creditor about how such situations

 

should be dealt with. The appropriate use of discretion is

 

essential in every case and no amount of guidance could

 

cover every situation, therefore the agent has a duty to

 

contact the creditor and report the circumstances in

 

situations where there is potential cause for concern. If

 

necessary, the enforcement agent will advise the creditor if

 

further action is appropriate. The exercise of appropriate

 

discretion is needed, not only to protect the debtor, but also

 

the enforcement agent who should avoid taking action

 

which could lead to accusations of inappropriate behaviour.

Enforcement agents must withdraw without making

enquiries if the only persons present are children who

 

appear to be under the age of 12.

Wherever possible, enforcement agents should have

arrangements in place for rapidly accessing translation

 

services when these are needed, and provide on request

 

information in large print or in Braille for debtors with

 

impaired sight.

Those who might be potentially vulnerable include:

the elderly;

 

people with a disability;

 

the seriously ill;

 

the recently bereaved;

 

single parent families;

 

pregnant women;

 

unemployed people; and,

 

those who have obvious difficulty in understanding,

 

speaking or reading English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Wonkeydonkey.

Would you suggest that I contact Jacobs and point out the info above? Or go back to the council?

I've already asked the council to take back the debt and let me pay at an affordable level, but they weren't interested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must advise the Council as a priority, enquire if they have a welfare officer if yes make an urgent appointment to see them, if not ask to make an appointment with the revenues department, take with you all evidence to benefits and if you are under a consultant at a hospital take evidence to that also or a letter from your GP, you will need to complete and income and expenditure sheet so any wage slips belonging to your partner will be needed.

 

I have sent pm to another cagger who is well up on the vulnerable status, if she is well enough I am sure she will br along to help you.

 

WD

 

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is arguable that there are sufficient goods on the levy to pay all fees, and a portion of the debt, on a deb t of £4,000 the bailiff needs to levy £40,000 of goods as it is reckoned, seized goods realise around 10% of their value. You do come into the vulnerable category, imho, and it may be argued that there are insufficient goods, and that the bailiff should have returned the account to the council Nullo Bono, insufficient goods, it may be argued that the bailiff levied soleley to make a financial gain for himself and his company. Could you list the goods levied exactly as written on the levy? Also send copies of evidence of vulnerability, such as medical conditions, letters from DWP regarding DLA to the council. Hopefully as WD alludes to kelcou may look in later, and she is expert on vulnerability.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it be a good idea to park the car elsewhere for the time being? Just a thought. It might help for a short while whilst you negotiate. sorry, I'm no expert ... except at racking up debt :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet the Bailiff is busy counting on this to be able to pay for his cruise round the Caribbean. I imagine seeing he has multiple LO's he can see multiple fees and I would urge you send off for a breakdown of fees ASAP.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BN yes I have sent PM to Rae, hope she is well enough to pop by and lend her expertise.

 

WD

 

I'll post what I can, but you'll have to bear with me a few minutes. I need to re-read the thread ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I toddle off and ponder, Norman_A you might be around. Can you confirm the following please?

Are you fully unemployed? (Sorry, I think you might be but it doesn't seem to say so in so many words). If so, are you in receipt of income based Job Seekers Allowance or contribution based JSA? Are you, instead, in receipt of or applying for Employment and Support Allowance? Does your girlfriend reside with you? And are the little ones hale and hearty? Thank-you ... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

And whilst we're at it, could you tell me a little more about your psoriatic arthritis? From what I've just read it doesn't seem a bundle of fun. How would you class it at present? Mild or severe? Are you receiving any ongoing or long term treatment etc? Feel free to PM me this type of info if you feel it is too personal for a public forum...

 

 

 

 

(Forgot to say thank-you, WD ...)

Edited by RaeUK
Thank-you, WD, by the way ... x
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much to everybody who's commented. I wasn't expecting to get this many responses so quickly.

 

 

 

I'm not sure of the exact wording on the levy. I've got it, but my partner has gone up to bed and I don't know where she's put it. I will find out in the morning.

 

Yes, I am fully unemployed. I claimed for ESA and DLA when I first had to stop working. I had my ATOS medical and was accepted as eligable for ESA, but because of a gap in my NI contributions (my own fault, again), I was only eligable for income based. I recieved £6.33 per week for six weeks before they stopped it. The DLA assessors decided I was eligable for lowest rate care element, as I struggle with holding pans and stuff sometimes. My partner lives with me and we do get housing and council tax benefit and The arrears are from before I had to stop working.

 

Kids are fine, so it's not all bad :)

 

Right now, I'd say the arthritis is moderate. It comes and goes though. It can be ok in the morning and agony by the afternoon, or it can be painfull all day. Sometimes I can get away with mowing the lawn before the pain kicks in and other times it's hard to get up the stairs.

I'm under a rheumatologist and have been taking methotrexate tablets and a cocktail of injections and painkillers.

Stress usually sets it off, so I'm expecting to be hobbling about tomorrow.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crikey, Norman, you PASSED an ATOSH medical? You know how rare that is? :D

 

If I understand things correctly, you now get neither income related ESA or JSA. That's a nuisance as they're both benefits you can have CT arrears deducted from at a small rate, usually about £3.50pw. I'm assuming this is due to your girlfriends income. I am no benefits expert so please check out the benefits forum on CAG. You can find it here.

 

My advice is fairly standard and probably includes much of what others have said. But do take the advice of other posters as well as I'm only interested in the vulnerable aspects and ignore most other things. (For example, the levy sounds like it is vexatious.The bailiff only looking to cover their own fees as the items levied will not cover sufficient in value for the council. That is for others to advise and you to shout about).

 

Here are four links that will be of interest to you:

 

The National Standards for Enforcement Agents 2012

 

DWP a to z of medical conditions

 

Civil Enforcement Association

 

Them bailiffs!

 

 

Do read the info in the links. I give you them because, even though I think you fit into the vulnerable category, it isn't in the bailiffs interest to agree. So, these are your weapons and quote liberally from them. The National Standards. They are there for a reason. They're only a guide the enemy will cry. But every council and every court has agreed to abide by them. The majority of bailiff firms have either agreed to abide by them or belong to an association that insists it's members abide by them.

The DWP link is the one DWP Decision Makers (should) use to assess how illnesses affect people. I know the link takes you to a different arthritis but I followed the psoriatic arthritis link. Obviously similar to the DWP. Quote from it or supply the link.

Jacobs belongs to the Civil Enforcement Association. The link takes you to the link for the CEA Code of Practice. (About the same as the National Standards). They cannot deny they know what they should be doing - ie returning the case back to the council.

The link to Jacobs. Always look at the bailiffs website. Especially if you need to make a Formal Complaint to the council. Jacobs have won oh so many industry awards, they must be professional, they must know what they're doing. So they clearly must understand the National Standards and their own Civil Enforcement Associations code of practice. See? It's so simple to use their own info against them...:)

 

That's a big enough post. I'll be back in a mo with the usual list of what to do next ...

Edited by RaeUK
Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to...

Write to the council Head of Revenue outlining why you are vulnerable. Include appropriate links, info, details of benefits and medical info. Email that in the first instance. Then follow up with a hard copy and include copies of any medical certificates, relevant medical info, copy of prescription can be useful, proof of benefits etc.

Copy the lot, including email, to the bailiff company.

Send all hardcopies signed for.

Have a cup of tea and wait for them to moan, complain, find obstacles to put in your path. Or, if the stars are aligned correctly, actually agree with you. Or make an offer. The only offer, however, you are looking for is that the council take the debt back, no bailiff action, and a sensible repayment amount that is both sustainable and affordable.

If they come back negatively, write a Formal Complaint to the Council CEO. I'll be happy to give a few tips there if needs be.

Hope all this a) makes sense and b) is remotely usefull.

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are your partners tax credits stopping? If your ESA was stopped because her income took you over the limit for receiving any payment but she's now losing the tax credits that took your income over the allowed limit to receive payment them it's possible you will be eligible to receive some payment again

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get thE CAB or a local welfare rights organisation to give you a benefit check, as there may be something hidden away a\that you could claim, check http://www.turn2us.com, for an online benefit self checker, but on the whole follow rae regarding the vulnerability, I am of the opinion that the bailiff has probably added multiple fees for one visit, and the levy itself may be dodgy, as they cannot charge multiple fees for liability orders served simultaneously. Ask for that fee breakdown if the levy doesn't specify in enough detail, you could use this template

 

"From:

My Name

My Address

 

To:

Acme bailifflink3.gif Co

Bailiff House

 

Ref: Account No: 123456

 

Dear Sir

 

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

 

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were certificatedlink3.gif at.

e - the date of the Certification.

 

This is not a Subject access requestlink3.gif under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

 

I require this information within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Ripped off customer"

 

I'm sure many fees can be challenged, and the end game is to get the council to take the debt back.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

GREAT advice from everyone.

 

The CAB will very likely help you with a letter and it is important that they advise the bailiff company that the vehicle is nearly 10 years old, worth approx £400 if sold privately and considerably less at auction and furthermore, has 165,000 miles on the clock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! Thank you all so much!!

 

I'm going to take notes from the advice and links and take them to the CAB with me this morning. I will update later on when I get back.

 

I just typed out a post about why the tax credits stopped, etc. But then I pressed the Backspace button to correct a spelling mistake and the whole thing disappeared. Will have a crack at it again later :)

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update:

 

Ploddertom, looks like you were pretty much spot on! I've just been through the paperwork that the bailiff filled out when he was here and I've been hit with £456 worth of charges so far. No doubt in my mind now that there's no way that selling everything on the levy wouldn't cover their fees, never mind pay a portion of the debt.

 

To answer brassnecked's earlier question, the items are written on th levy as follows...

 

ford mondeo Black "reg no"

Laptop ACER

ipod docking station Gear4

Sony flat screen tv silver

DVD player silver prism

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the point of that levy, its totally useless, as you say it wont even cover the bailiff costs, let alone storage fee's and auction cost's. Or even touch the amount you owe to the council.

 

As I have said, this should have gone back to the council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update:

 

Ploddertom, looks like you were pretty much spot on! I've just been through the paperwork that the bailiff filled out when he was here and I've been hit with £456 worth of charges so far. No doubt in my mind now that there's no way that selling everything on the levy wouldn't cover their fees, never mind pay a portion of the debt.

 

To answer brassnecked's earlier question, the items are written on th levy as follows...

 

ford mondeo Black "reg no"

Laptop ACER

ipod docking station Gear4

Sony flat screen tv silver

DVD player silver prism

Thanks.

 

 

That levy is vexatious, there are insufficient goods to even cover the fees they will add, it should have gone back Nullo bono, insufficient goods

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

... the items are written on th levy as follows...

 

ford mondeo Black "reg no"

Laptop ACER

ipod docking station Gear4

Sony flat screen tv silver

DVD player silver prism

 

Thanks.

 

Car? Laptop? Flat screen tv? Good Lord, Sir! You never told me you were rich! :D

 

Hope you're feeling a little bit better about the situation you're in. It might still be a bit of a battle but you have a good family around you in CAG

 

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol, Kelcou. Sony flat screen TV sounds good written down, until you actually look at the thing and realise that it's a good ten years old, with no remote, and it doesn't even show a picture unless you plug a digi box into it first. As for the laptop, give me a tenner and it's yours :)

 

I've been to the CAB and he managed to call the dogs off for three weeks while I get everything in order. He's also booked me an appointment with their debt management officer (or whatever his job title is) and another for a benefit check.

Hopefully that little bit of breathing space will allow me to get everything sorted out now.

 

I'm feeling a bit better now, thanks. :)

 

I've got a debt pack, with income/expenditure forms, etc to fill out now and then I'll have a look at requesting a breakdown of the charges, etc.

 

Could I ask another question?

Would it be best to write the letters/emails to the council and bailiffs, complaining about the charges and the levy now, or should I wait until I've seen the debt officer?

 

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...