Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Link financial and ccj forms


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4261 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Welcome to CAG

 

So you have received court papers from Link and you are going to defend?

 

Can you give us the full story please.

 

I'll move your thread to the correct forum

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok bear with me because I'm on mobile as pc faulty.

 

In 2000 we bought a car by 2004 we defaulted and agreement termed. Agreement with G E Woodchester. The debt was passed to Link (not sure when) in 2005 we set up a payment plan but defaulted.

 

Hadn't heard a thing till today when got a claim form. I called link (mistakingly) only to be told that I either pay in full or over 5 months at 400 per month. I argued the fact I have a dmp with cccs that I've had for four years and there is a debt payable to link which is separate to this and has been paid on time every month so they have knowledge of us and our payments.

 

Now they are saying we have had a dn sent last month (never received) and also called several "hundred" times on my mobile and left messages ( never received).

 

My concern is hubby got made redundant in Dec 2011 and is on JSA I'm working. We currently only pay 5.00 per month to our creditors on dmp (11 creditors). They want it all now but that's not going to happen.

 

How can I defend this due to no correspondence received ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please do provide full details.

 

Non-receipt of letters is not really a basis to defend the claim. Also, how do you know what you have not received?

 

Sorry meant to say never received letters giving me any opportunity to reply to them prior to cc claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default notice point won't get you anywhere as a) it doesn't matter whether you recieived it or not and b) they don't actually need to serve one anyway, since this agreement will have matured years ago so there is no accelerated payment. If I were you I would just send the claim form off to your debt management company and let them make a pro rata offer to the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default notice point won't get you anywhere as a) it doesn't matter whether you recieived it or not and b) they don't actually need to serve one anyway, since this agreement will have matured years ago so there is no accelerated payment. If I were you I would just send the claim form off to your debt management company and let them make a pro rata offer to the claim.

 

Yes but that means I would get a ccj and we can't afford that with my husbands job situation

Link to post
Share on other sites

If no payment or written acknowledgement has been made in a clear period of 6 years (5 in Scotland) then this will be Statute Barred.

 

You need to find out exactly when that last payment was made....even if it was end of March 206 it would be SB.

 

I would check the CRA file rather than guess what it says

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If no payment or written acknowledgement has been made in a clear period of 6 years (5 in Scotland) then this will be Statute Barred.

 

You need to find out exactly when that last payment was made....even if it was end of March 206 it would be SB.

 

I would check the CRA file rather than guess what it says

 

ims

 

By CRA do you mean credit report?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say this debt is not in your dmp?

 

Sb is an absolute defence on its own and a judge cannot change that so your defence to the claim would be that it is statutory barred under the Limitations Act 1980.

 

Have you not got any financial records going back to that time (maybe in the loft or something)?

 

Was the debt sold to Link or were they acting on behalf of the original creditor?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Responding to S.O.S from ims21 on your behalf.

 

Statute barred debts.. you need to find out when you made the last payment on this debt.

 

Many DCAs will argue that limitation accrues from the time when the "default notice" is issued. It does not.

 

Limitation clock starts ticking from when the payment is due and not paid not when they send a default notice.

 

We see often that CRA entries will date 5 or 6 months ahead of when the payment was missed.

 

People need to be sure that they aren’t being hoodwinked and that the DCA is extending limitation so they can sue when they are not allowed to.

 

Can you let us know exactly what it states on the claim form .. what are they actually claiming for ?

 

Have you sent a CPR request for information ?

 

IMHO, I would send a CPR part 18 immediately as shown below.

 

xx

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your Name

Your Address

 

IN THE XXXXXXXXX county courtlink3.gif

CLAIM NO:

BETWEEN:

XXXXXXXXXX

Claimant

and

XXXXXXXXXXX

Defendant

PART 18 REQUEST FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

To: XXXXXXXXXX (claimant)

 

Please answer the following questions:

 

1. Upon what date was the last payment made on the account?

2. What was the source, method and amount of the payment?

 

 

TAKE NOTICE THAT YOU ARE REQUIRED TO ANSWER THE ABOVE REQUEST WITHIN 14 DAYS OF SERVICE OF THE SAME UPON YOU

xx

 

There have been some instances where a "phantom payment" has been made.. so you will certainly need proof of how the payment was made.

 

What is the date of issue of the claim form - you will find this in the top right hand corner of the claim form.. just so we know what the time line is.

 

The above CPR should be sent via Special delivery post to the solicitor on the claim form. Keep the posting receipt and check on the RM website for its delivery date and print off the signature page.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the claim form it says a notice of assignment was sent March 2005 therefore I presume it was sold as g.e capital were original creditor.

 

I will search this weekend for some info but we moved in here June 2005 and I think that the stuff was thrown away

 

Yes, NoA implies that the account was sold to a 3rd party.

 

Can you remember if any payments were made to this "new owner"

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim form states....

 

 

The claimant claims all sums due upon the termination if an agreement made between ge capital Woodchester and the defendants in writing and opened 12/5/2000. The agreement was terminated after the defendant had failed to comply with the terms of the agreement and the default notice served upon them on 2/11/2004. The agreement has been legally assigned to the claimant by the DoA with an effective date of 1/4/2005. And made regular upon the claimant serving a notice of assignment upon the defendant shortly thereafter. The agreement is regulated be the cca 1974.

 

Amount claimed 2028.37

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claim form states....

 

 

The claimant claims all sums due upon the termination if an agreement made between ge capital Woodchester and the defendants in writing and opened 12/5/2000. The agreement was terminated after the defendant had failed to comply with the terms of the agreement and the default notice served upon them on 2/11/2004. The agreement has been legally assigned to the claimant by the DoA with an effective date of 1/4/2005. And made regular upon the claimant serving a notice of assignment upon the defendant shortly thereafter. The agreement is regulated be the cca 1974.

 

Amount claimed 2028.37

 

They are implying there that a Default Notice was served on you and that you failed to remedy it. In 2004.. Therefore I would be thinking it is likely that no payment was made after that date. In which case it could well be statute barred. However, I would send the CPR18 request off immediately and see what they come back with.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...