Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • First of all look at the agreement header and advise exactly what agreement she has Likely HP, Conditional Sale, or PCP Write to them setting out the reason for her short term difficulties and set out the payment going forward ( including the extra payment to cover any arrears) Should they be foolish enough to refuse  just pay what she can afford anyway  After two months they can then issue an arrears notice at which point (if they are still refusing her offer) go straight for a Time Order  This can be done once an arrears notice/default notice has been issued and as the issue is short term and she wishes to keep the car is the best way forward 
    • I've had a quick read as to what a legal advisor order means, my understanding is it would've speeded things up. I must admit I'm surprised to learn from jk2054 that my Sept court date is only a directions hearing and not a trial. I will in due course inform Evri that I have no intention of settling for other than the full amount of my claim including interest, I'll also include additional text as suggested by BankFodder. If settlement fails and it goes to trial the lengthy period this is taking is of no concern to me, I'm prepared to go the distance. rgds J
    • Can I just confirm that our witness statement will also be our objection to the claimants application for summary judgement ?
    • Andrew Neil’s got your measure Jugg 🤣😂   ANDREW NEIL: It's easy to mock the entitled know-nothing student protesters who couldn't find Gaza on a map. But they are useful idiots making common cause with genocidal Islamists who want to see Israel wiped out | Daily Mail Online WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK It was the moment which underscored the absurdity of those behind the anti-Israeli student unrest that is currently sweeping... …….. they are useful idiots making common cause with genocidal Islamists who want to see Israel wiped out
    • I don't understand why you didn't get a legal advisor order that's quite confusing I must say   @BankFodderI don’t think I’ve ever seen one of these have you?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard go back on promise to stop interest


Sev
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4413 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Contact BC in writing only - phone calls will get you nowhere and you have no paper trail.

 

If you are in Financial Difficulty and can show this with a Budget Planner, the bank also has a duty to stop adding charges and interest as per the banks' Lending Code. See this thread - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?333949-Cahoot-bank-charges-Claim&p=3680602&viewfull=1#post3680602

 

It would also help you to know where you stand as regards the amount of the debt, and the amount you could reclaim in default charges. BC will refund not only the default charges but also compound interest. Read the advice and links in this thread - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?217867-Fishman123-vs-barclaycard-ex-MSDW&p=3680593&viewfull=1#post3680593

 

Then let us know approx what is owed on each a/c and what you reclaim in charges and compound interest at 24.9%.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, sorry for the delay in replying back to this thread.

 

Ok, the update is strangely enough of no surprise.

 

on the 26th January I received a text message saying:

 

"at barclaycard we are fully commited to resolving your complaint. Please contact our UK based complaints advisors today on 08000150451 between 9am to 9pm non to fri"

 

I sent them a letter detailing everything above and received a reply back saying that they would have a decision by the 22nd Feb - regarding my 'complaint'.

 

On the 26th feb I received a letter saying that my 'complaint' was still being looked into. there was no date of expected resolution or communication.

 

I'll scan them in so that you can all see.

 

In the mean time, my April statements have arrived. The Visa account has £2032.57 owing and the minimum payment is £45.08 The interest on the balance is £22.34

 

The MasterCard now has £340.17 owing and the interest is £4.97

 

I think it's time to read up on all those above threads and go for it. It's been over 6 years since I fell on hard times and this bunch haven't made it any easier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sev,

 

It'd help us to know approx how much you have identified in default charges and compound interest for each card a/c.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

After falling on hard times some years ago, I reached agreements with all my creditors with regards to a token payment.

 

Barclaycard were the most difficult, and an agreement was never reached - they ultimately said pay £51pcm and we'll stop the interest, the other option was the relentless harrassement from their debt collection department.

 

before Christmas I received a letter saying that they wanted a new financial statement to review the situation, which I sent (under recorded delivery).

 

I received a letter a few weeks later saying that as no statement had been received, that interest would once again be applied.

Since new year I have had interest once again applied on my accounts. This means that of the 51 pounds paid, 28 of it goes on interest charges.

 

I wrote a letter to them asking them to stop interest. They treated it as a complaint - dragged it out for two months and then I received a reply three months later stating that;

 

Customer services were not willing to stop interest.

 

The amount I pay is well above the minimum payment (so he never actually looked to see that I was on a payment agreement), thus could well afford the interest.

 

That my other creditors being affected by this was none of their concern.

 

But... If I wanted to talk about it... just call...!!!!

 

 

So my question is, what now?

 

I am very tempted to renege on the payment agreement and just pay the same token amount to them as to everyone else - after all, they always received the lion share of my available income.

 

Put it all in the hands of someone like payplan and set up a dmp.

 

re-evaluate all my offers and contact all my creditors again with new offers citing Barclaycard as having forced my hand.

 

I'm furious, I've done everything I can to repay my debts and not wriggle out or run away from them, and all I/ we get is a kicking, and In truth I thought I was done with this thrashing it out three years ago.

 

I have two accounts, a MC and a Visa with 380 and 2800 owing respectively, and now they have my egg card as well. I am in half a mind to just throw the 51 pounds on the MC as it's the smaller sum and therefore will make the most noticeable dent straight away, send a letter explaining what i've done and why and then I suppose wait for the filth that is Mercers to come ringing.

 

There's not even any addresses to write to any more, they just cite a phone number in the first instance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sev

also, see (if not already) the bankers Lending Code re financial difficulties p28, interest p34, etc

post #4 here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?56391-Examples-of-codes-of-conduct

eg

 

'Subscribers should consider reducing or stopping interest and charges when a customer evidences that they are in financial difficulties........'

'Where a customer is able to make only token payments, their debt should not increase as a result of interest and charges levied.....'

'It is inappropriate for interest and charges to continue to be taken where the result would be that the repayment period for the customer becomes excessive..........'

'Concessions should not be arbitrarily withdrawn irrespective of a customer’s ability to pay or without any evidence of a change in the customer’s circumstances. Expiry of a repayment arrangement should not automatically lead to the withdrawal of concessions. This does not rule out regular reviews and if a customer’s position has improved then interest and charges can be reintroduced.'

 

etc

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...