Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Interview Under Caution


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3822 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A further update on this for anyone who has followed the case so far. More post yesterday one from appeals and they are sending a doctor out to examine my son which I think is good as they will be able to see for themselves how he is affected. Another from appeals which is a copy of what they have sent to dwp asking what they are trying to prove as they have viewed the dvd they were sent. Another from solicitor which said that the appeals will probably wait now until the court case is all over. Could anyone who is going through or been through this confirm that this is what usually happens. I feel the appeal should still go ahead but if they are going to wait for the court hearings it will be a very long time before it gets to appeal.

 

Should be the other way around - the court case should wait on the the appeal outcome. An appeal won't be delayed for a court case.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 184
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thankyou Estellyn, I was hoping this would be the case. Maybe when he goes to magistrates they will adjourn untill the appeal has been heard.

 

You'll need a solicitor who knows what they're doing. Yours sounds a little.....confused.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Right the doctor came out and he went through everything with my son and then examined him, he said that some of the conditions are rare (we know this) so this makes it more difficult for people to grasp how it affects him. I know there are a lot of negative reports about atos doctors but I hope this one is okay as he did seem so.

We have been to see one of the solicitors today and he has said that the appeal will go ahead but, he doubts that we will get a date for that before the magistrates court date.

He also said that if and a big if things went against us then my son would have to pay for his barrister for crown court which is in the region of £5500.

The cost of this is just mounting all the time.

I have to say though both solicitors and the doctors are confident that he will win his appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right the doctor came out and he went through everything with my son and then examined him, he said that some of the conditions are rare (we know this) so this makes it more difficult for people to grasp how it affects him. I know there are a lot of negative reports about atos doctors but I hope this one is okay as he did seem so.

We have been to see one of the solicitors today and he has said that the appeal will go ahead but, he doubts that we will get a date for that before the magistrates court date.

He also said that if and a big if things went against us then my son would have to pay for his barrister for crown court which is in the region of £5500.

The cost of this is just mounting all the time.

I have to say though both solicitors and the doctors are confident that he will win his appeal.

 

You can contact the Tribunal service and request an expedited Tribunal date due to the circumstances - did your solicitor not suggest this option? It is important that the Tribunal happen before the criminal case.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I know exactly how you are feeling - I had a letter on Saturday afternoon - so had all weekend and a bank holiday to worry myself sick over it! I rang the council number (it says it's to do with housing/council tax benefit), on the letter. The person it is signed by out of the office until next week! Managed to speak to a colleague to ask for more information. I was told it is due to a change in circumstances and to do with my job. Only thing I can think of is I did 4 days work at the racecourse just before Easter. If they have said this is what it is can they 'change' the information? It seems crazy if this is what it is as I won't be doing it again anyway, as it was a casual thing - I have been so scared and upset, I have never committed any offence or done anything wrong and feel stupid and embarassed about the whole thing. Couldn't they just have phoned or written an ordinary letter to enquire about it? Crazy thing is if I could get a job that either had more hours or paid more I wouldn't need to claim any of the benefits in the first place, worked and paid taxes since I was 18 and this is how I am made to feel! This country stinks!

Seems you can't get a decent job these days (I'm on minimum wage, part time and a lone parent), prob be better off claiming out of work benefits! Can't win........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nixie99 from the experience we have had with my son they don`t tell you in advance what they THINK you have done wrong. I fyou know you are not doing anything wrong then you have to say so (not that this has helped in our case). You will have to go to this interview and see what they have to say but, please don`t go alone take a solicitor with you and I hope it all works out for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well my son was at court today and it was ridiculous. He was at magistrates and the dwp kept saying he should not have been paid any benefit because he was working. I could hardly believe this as its just stupid as we all know dla is an in work benefit. It will not go to crown court and the magistrates have said the dwp had to have their case ready for 30th july as they have had more than long enough to prepare. To be honest I felt a lot better after today than I have the whole time this has gone on as they made themselves look fools and they were told this. Our gp is attending court with us on 30th july and we have been told it will be dealt with on that date and we will be able to put this whole thing behind us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think so too,they kept going on about him working and his solicitor kept saying that dla is an in work benefit and they have always known he works. They did say at one point that you cant get benefits and work only to be corrected again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's ridiculous. I'm sure it says on the award letter that you have to inform them if you work; (because it's a change in circumstance) but nowhere does it say you can't work and claim DLA. I know many people who do with no problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me Nystagmite that the left hand has no idea what the right hand is doing. I must say though I have felt much better in myself since yesterday as if they cant even get that right what chance do they have against a whole load of medical evidence? The whole thing is a waste of public money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your right, they don't seem to know what theyre doing, and it doesn't just apply to that dept ...even david cammoron was caught out with his bedroom tax ****-up speech lol.......hapless hopeless lot all round.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the dwp kept saying he should not have been paid any benefit because he was working. I could hardly believe this as its just stupid as we all know dla is an in work benefit.

 

Welcome to the wonderful world of the CPS. They now prosecute DWP cases but don't seem to have a grasp of benefit rules just yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a rheumatology nurse specialist and obviously understand scleroderma and its effects on patients and of course their families. I totally empathise with you and your son around DLA. I have had patients in tears frightened that they will lose their DLA - which they use to make their trips to hospital for treatment which keeps them in employment/functional members of society. It is so frustrating when expert specialist professional opinion is disregarded and some paper shifter makes a decision on a person they know nothing about. I'd like to see them trying to button a shirt when they have no finger movement/digital ulcers or indeed no fingers or can only walk at a snail's pace in extreme pain or so breathless as a result of their lung and heart involvement all secondary to their systemic sclerosis.

 

I get many letters/request for information from the DWP about a patient of mine and their condition. This takes an immense amount of time. With the introduction of PIP this is only going to get worse. Rheumatology as a whole is affected quite badly by the changes to the disability benefits due to the nature of rheumatic disease. This is beginning to add a burden to already stretched services.

 

Anyway, back to the original topic - best of luck for your son at his court date!

Disclaimer: Any advice given is solely my own. I advise you seek professional advice in the first instance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so glad that you seem to be getting somewhere. I am not being prosecuted by the CPS but a joint local council and DWP collaberation. 2 years mine has been dragging on and yet they had another adjournment despite the Judge telling them they had to be ready for the June hearing and its been put off again until July

 

So pleased for you as I know the stress of this completly

 

 

regards

 

sinkinghelp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Panthro thankyou for that, so many people do not understand his condition and think it is so easy to live with. He is judged every day by a work colleague and I think personally that dwp pen pushers should read up on some of these conditions and see just how they affect people.Sinkinghelp I really feel for you after 2 years the stress has to be so bad it can only make matters worse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...