Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to correct myself it should have said scrappage scheme...obviously a cash deposit would form part of the agreement and payments made to the total value of the vehicle providing it is shown as payment within the HP agreement.   .
    • As with other posts here. IGNORE completely.  
    • Welcome to the forum. I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Interesting. Thanks for that London.  That’s what I’m gathering.     iv no doubt they would send me fake documents but would they really dare present fake documents to a court of law?
    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

wonga lending to under 18s


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4241 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter is now 17 and has suffered with depression for the last four years, before Christmas she borrowed money from Wonga (she had a part time job at the time). She paid the money back but was shocked by the amount of interest she paid, when she told me I contacted them by phone and by email and asked for their policy as regards lending to under 18s, they stated they do not lend to under 18s but refused to comment on how this had happened. I also informed them she was not 18. Her job finished and her money was limited again, she has since told me that she has borrowed again from Wonga but that they had sent her emails that told her she could borrow small amounts,she has ended up owing £240. She now has to pay £70 monthly to clear this debt. She has no untilities or bills listed in her name and only has a bank account. I would like advice on where we stand legally and if there is anything I can do as I feel they have taken advantage of a young vunerable person without carrying out adequate checks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

How did your daughter apply for the first loan ?

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking in their T's & C's there must be a box to tick to say whether your over 18 or not.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick replies. There is and she ticked it to say she was, which was untrue and stupid of her, but after she repaid the first loan, I informed them both via telephone and email that she was not 18 but despite this they still sent her emails offering to lend her small amounts of money. Also she did not at any point have to send proof of her age or address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very very wrong. Why not contact MP Stella Creasy who is collecting evidence against PDL companies, she has journalists waiting for stories on 'the big boys' such as Wonga.

 

I would also complain to the Advertising Standards Agency about the Wonga TV ads to add to the complaints about this lot.

 

It seems they are happy to lend to anyone and this is hardly 'responsible' of them

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The TV ads targetting pensioners are just as bad!

 

Many older people such as the ones depicted on their 3D rendered dolls wouldn't understand their terms and may be surviving on a low pension. Tobacco advertising is not allowed, the same should apply to Wonga and other loan sharks like them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end of the day your daughter applied for a loan and was under 18. She must have altered her date of birth on the application process. In effect this is fraud however can't see Wonga bothering about this, and I'd say the loan is unforceable as it can't be covered by CCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end of the day your daughter applied for a loan and was under 18. She must have altered her date of birth on the application process. In effect this is fraud however can't see Wonga bothering about this, and I'd say the loan is unforceable as it can't be covered by CCA.

She did alter her DOB on the original loan after which I contacted them myself by phone and email informing them of her DOB. Despite this they still sent her emails telling her she could borrow small amounts of money. The issue is not paying the money back, she borrowed it she should pay it back its the way they have targeted her despite knowing her age and encouraged her to borrow money without checking if shes employed and can pay it back, I also informed them of her major depressive illness yet this has made no difference to the way they have treated her

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pay the initial loan off. Thats it. Due to her being underage, they cant make her pay anything else.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

This should be reported to trading standards!

 

Don't ring the Daily Mail. Just look at their reader comments. They tend to be most unsympathetic, blaming borrowers for their own misfortunes and besides, any article written will be loaded with spelling mistakes. I love their articles that try to criticise the education system. They tend to be the most badly written...I diverge.....

 

Anyway, Trading standards are on

 

08454 040506

Edited by kurvaface
Link to post
Share on other sites

Zoebre,please contact Admin [email protected] with details of your brief/company etc as per site rules.

Thanks.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...