Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA contributions vs income based


Bipolar bear
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4453 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi can anyone help with this please, I have been placed in the ESA WRAG without a medical but it says contribution based and I have to apply for income related ESA if eligible. My wife rang them today and a very nasty guy at the other end said you cannot get the two together at all and it would be like being paid wages and then asking for them again a few days later - yes I got his snotty way of mentioning wages when talking to a scrounger like me - and dismissed her out of hand without asking for any details yet even the DWP website says you can get top up income based ESA if eligible.

The letter from the council regarding HB and CTB say we are 50 a week short of the amount the law says we need to live on yet we cant find out what that means, it seems like the system is designed to confuse and obfuscate.

Please if you can plaese help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The man you spoke to is wrong. You can get income based and contributions based if, including other income, you have less money coming in than the law says you need to live on. For example, contributions based doesn't include the severe or enhanced disability premiums. So, if you meet the criteria for that, you can apply for that.

 

You should be able to get a benefits check done - I think your council can help with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your wife has been given incorrect information, as Nystagmite pointed out. You are absolutely correct that a 'top up' of income related ESA can be paid if you have less than the 'applicable amount' - the amount that the law says you need to live on.

 

The amount that the law says you need to live on (the 'applicable amount') varies depending on your circumstances. A single person's applicable amount will be different to that of a couple. A non disabled person's will be different to a severly disabled person's.

 

The amounts change every April as benefits are uprated.

 

As the council have said you are receiving less than your applicable amount during a housing benefit calculation, it is probable that an income related top up of ESA could be paid.

 

Because I do not know your income/capital information, or your ages I can't tell you what you should be getting. What I can say is that if your capital is under £6000 and you have no income other than your ESA, the amount of ESA you should be getting (and to which it can be topped up), bearing in mind that you are in the wrag would be £132.70. This does not take into account any additional disability premiums and assumes that both you and your wife are over 18. If you are entitled to premiums, it will be higher. If you have other income or capital above £6000, it would be lower.

 

If you are only getting £94.25 then you are only receiving contributory based ESA (WRAG) for yourself.

 

Sorry that I cannot be more specific but without knowing more, I cannot guess what you are eligible for.

 

In the stickies, (the yellow coloured threads) at the top of the benefit forum, there is a thread called "Current Benefit Rates" - these are all the benefit rates from April 2011 up until April 2012. After April 2012 the thread will change to the new rates.

 

You can view it against the information here to figure out what you should be getting.

 

If you are not getting what you should be, contact ESA again. You will have to do it because you are the claimant - your wife can speak for you if you give your consent to the person on the telephone. Explain that you want to claim income related ESA. If you get the same response as before, insist on speaking to a manager. If the manager gives you the same response tell them that you would like a call back from the ESA office that deals with your claim - insist upon it. When you phone ESA you are not actually speaking to people who are trained in ESA processing (how to decide a claim), but are speaking to people who are trained to answer general enquiries on ESA and give information about an ongoing claim that is held on the computer. These people (most of them) will have no idea about the inns and outs of ESA claims which can be quite complex.

 

If you manage to begin making a claim, tell them that you want to claim the income related element from today and are requesting it be backdated to today, because you tried to claim today but were misadvised by the DWP enquiry line that you could not claim. You should not be at financial detriment (even if it is only a few days) because an official acting for the DWP gave you incorrect information.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies everyone its brilliant to have people out there who understand the ins and outs of this maze.

We are going to look at the councils benefits advisor and see what they make of it all, atm the letters say we 'need' £399 to live on and we receive £340 I am disabled get DLA mid care and high Mobility been on IB for a long time now and have three children 10,12 and 17 and we are married my wife gets carers allowance as well. Does this sound about right or am I better talking to someone like the benefits adviser?

Once again thanks for answering and it really helps to know there are people out there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your wife can make a claim for Income Support for you and herself, and claim CTC for the children she receives child benefit for.

You would stay on ESA, because its ESA Conts, and your ESA would come off her I.S..

Her grounds to Income Support would be her carers allowance, she would claim as a carer

 

You should be this way entitled to what you were claiming before if you were on IS/IB prior to the switch to ESA,

 

just an option.....

 

this depends of course what your ESA amount you are getting, check out Ericas entitlement link :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...