Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So I just found a couple abandoned traffic cones locally by some bins.   A bit squished but free!  So have placed them on the land.  Will wait to see if the cones get moved and signs ignored again this week before I consider rocks/ boulders.
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ issued to old address


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4458 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I am in the process of setting up a DMP with CCCS. I checked my credit report (which I've been too scared to so for a long time) and found I have a CCJ which was registered on 11/04/2011 to an address I lived at when I was a student (about 4 years ago). This is for a payday loan debt I hoped had gone away. Does anyone know if a CCJ is enforceable if it has been issued to an old address, as I had no knowledge of it and was unable to put together any defence? Or is there any process I can go through to appeal it or get it set aside? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCJ is enforceable, but if you did not receive the claim papers so

you could not defend the case then you would need to get the order

set aside.

Get in touch with the court that issued the CCJ.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

If the creditor sought court proceedings at an address where they believed you to be living at the time (i.e. your last known address) a set aside is discretionary. A set aside may be agreed if you have a real prospect of defending the claim or if the court is satisfied that there is some other good reason why the judgment should be set aside. Please also bear in mind that set aside applications should be made 'promptly'.

 

If the claim was sent to an old address, i.e. the creditor was made aware that you had moved you should be allowed to have the judgment set aside as a matter of right.

 

From the information provided if the creditor wasn't made aware that you had moved you may encounter great difficulties in obtaining a set aside - especially if there is no realistic prospect of success in defending the claim.

 

We expand on these points within our fact sheet, you can find it here:

 

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=12_how_to_set_aside_a_judgment_in_the_county_court

 

Best wishes,

 

National Debtline.

For Free, Confidential and Independent advice: 0808 808 4000

Monday - Friday 9am to 9pm // Saturday 9.30am to 1pm // 24-hour voicemail. Please leave a message to request an information pack. http://www.nationaldebtline.org // http://www.mymoneysteps.org

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, excellent advice there. I was trying to ascertain whether the claim was properly served and it does seem that it was which means you have to rely on the court's discretionary powers based, primarily, on whether you have a defence to the claim.

 

So, why don't you owe the money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the information provided if the creditor wasn't made aware that you had moved you may encounter great difficulties in obtaining a set aside - especially if there is no realistic prospect of success in defending the claim.

 

Sorry to disagree, but there is no provision to provide current address to any company. If they wish to perform due diligence, they can obtain via public records an address for a debtor. Also it would be probable that mail was returned / not replied to if sent to previous address and a judgement entered in default.

 

This can form the basis for a S-A.

 

Also there would most probably be charges on the loan that are not correct therefore the OP can seek to challenge the amount claimed.

 

Look around here for Pay Day loans and the challenges to the 30 day period.... the only amount due under these are the original amount loaned and one months interest.

 

Also had you the oppotunity to defend you would have challenged these alledged charges and mitigated the amount claimed.

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Sorry to disagree, but there is no provision to provide current address to any company. If they wish to perform due diligence, they can obtain via public records an address for a debtor. Also it would be probable that mail was returned / not replied to if sent to previous address and a judgement entered in default.

 

This can form the basis for a S-A.

 

N

 

Most contracts, but by no means all, will include a term for the debtor to keep the creditor informed of their address if it changes. Also most will have a provision that service at the last known address will be deemed sufficient service.

 

There is no requirement for a creditor to perform 'due diligence' before effecting service unless they have reasonable grounds to believe the debtor was not at that address at the time (and this belief is usually countered by reliance on those contractual terms)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right guys, thanks for all your help so far, heres an update on my poor state of financial affairs:I have searched old emails and found that on 22nd Dec 2010 I agreed to pay £50 a month to clear the account. Tower capital then stated that no further action would be taken. I have not yet checked old bank statements (need to request from bank as I dont have access to that account anymore) but I am presuming for some reason this wasnt collected by them (they were meant to be collecting the payment with my card details) and then the judgement was entered in April 2011. I have received no further correspondence from them after setting up the payment plan, and had presumed that the account was clear. I didn't ever provide my new address however. Does this provide me with any further grounds for a set aside? I.e. set up and arrangement but received no further contact from creditor when they could not take payment?Also I have not yet contacted Tower Capital regarding this. Is there any way I can get them to remove the judgement if i pay the outstaning balance in full, do they have any power to request this or does it all sit with the court now? I know I am clutching at straws but I need all the help posible with this, I'd rather give it a shot than just lie down and be left with a CCJ for 5 more years. Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To set the CCJ aside you will need to have good prospects of defending. What would you defence be? Agreeing to pay and then not making the payments probably won't be enough on its own.

 

If the CCJ is not set aside the only was to get rid of it is to pay up. However, is will still show on your credit file just marked as 'satisfied'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No i didnt realise the payments were not being taken - I'm waiting to receive some copy statements from the old account so will trawl through then. My defense would be that I had contacted them to make a payments arrangement and started making payments, but then for some reason they stopped being taken. Had I recevied the forms/known about the CCJ I would have been able to contact them regarding the missing payments and rectify the situation within the appropriate time limits. Also is it not in my favour that they did not contact me to day they werent getting the payments before going in for the CCJ?Again clutching at straws but its my only hope so it would be great if someone could advise of the best couse of action with the set aside. Should I contact the creditor or just deal with the courts only? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look at Part 6 of the CPR which deals with service. Decide whether or not you were served with the claim. Then look at CPR Part 13 and decide whether a mandatory or discretionary ground (or both or neither) apply in your case.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again, With reference to part 6 the following paragraph stands out: Where a claimant has reason to believe that the address of the defendant referred to in entries 1, 2 or 3 in the table in paragraph (2) is an address at which the defendant no longer resides or carries on business, the claimant must take reasonable steps to ascertain the address of the defendant’s current residence or place of business (‘current address’).As I had not replied to any previous correspondence sent to the old address, surely that would have reason to believe this is an address at which I no longer reside? And "reasonable steps" would have involved checking the electoral roll, at which point I would have shown at a new address. Credit checks would also have shown this. There is also a section regarding alternative methods of service, i.e. electronically - they had my email address, could they not have issued papers this way?Re part 13 I believe mandatory - The judge should believe the defendant would be able to defend the claim. I already had email proof that I was willing to pay the amount, following setting up the payment plan. Had I known about the judgement I would obviously have either paid in full or requested more time to pay by installments. Any advice on how to proceed? Thanks for your help so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...