Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PPE at work. Forced to get changed prior to starting work.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4431 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We enter our factory thru the main doors, then clock-in at an electronic e-time machine. From there, we go to the locker rooms to change into PPE (personal protective equipment) Flash suits, boots, body warmers etc.,

 

We then attend our "place of work" in the factory.

 

The company now want us to enter the building, get changed into PPE, then go to our "place of work" where a "clocking machine" will be installed.

 

Whilst most of us are very punctual and attend work in good time, we feel as if PPE time is really work time. What the company are doing, is forcing us to change into PPE during OUR own time.

 

As a further example, if I'm running a little late, I can still get to work on time, BUT still be late clocking in because this process can take up to 10 mins.

 

The same is true of leaving work. We will be required to "clock out" at our place of work. THEN go and get changed out of our PPE, before leaving the building.

 

Any thoughts, rules, laws, etc.,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not wishing to be tough but given the state of the economy surely u should be glad u have a job especially with this being such a trivial matter. Would u be allowed to take ur ppe home and as such arrive at work wearing it without the loss of any time. It took my daughter nearly 18mth to get a job and i know she would have been happy just for the wage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not wishing to be tough but given the state of the economy surely u should be glad u have a job especially with this being such a trivial matter. Would u be allowed to take ur ppe home and as such arrive at work wearing it without the loss of any time. It took my daughter nearly 18mth to get a job and i know she would have been happy just for the wage.

 

So once again we have to be grateful for a job. Where's the protection for the individual? This policy affects over 500 people. This is after losing break times, losing bonuses and working an extra 2 hrs free a week. Whilst the office (upper management) continue with their benefits. Our company has exceeded all expectations in global profits for the previous two years, despite the recession, yet we (the workers) are having what little we've got chipped away. Where does it end? Or should I keep my big mouth shut and be grateful for a job? Trivial!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must forgive me but if u read ur initial post none of the supporting information was given and the only issue u raised was one of ten mins a day, i would suggest if there are 500 people effected u have more power together than u realise. I would contact the main union that deals with your industry and see if u can negotiate terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think you should be concerned about having the job !! Your employer is taking you for a ride. 20 mins a day x 5 day = 1hr 40 a week x how many employees. I'd get the union in to sort this or read your terms and conditions. Too many employers think they can rip us off. Hold your stance and don't let them away with it - this is a money saving scheme at the cost of you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite right Johnvernon... I am sick, sore and tired of employers extracting the proverbial hoping we're too thick to notice!

There is a thing called "mutuality of obligation" which means you the employee, give up your time to carry out work for the employer and the employer pays you.

The wearing of the PPE is for work purposes only so why should you put it on in your own time... See your union rep or HR, get hold of the staff handbook or personnel manual and see if you can find anything regarding it

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

One other aspect to think about: Is the clocking in machine used for any form of health and safety records, e.g: fire drill role call. If you are physically in the building but not 'registered', what happens if there is a fire drill or emergency evacuation.

 

Where I work, the first thing I have to do when I enter the building is 'tick in'. It may not be the same as a time clock, but if i'm late it's noticed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Employment law states that clocking in can be done at the site of work, not on entering the premises.

 

That can make an enormous difference on a large site, where you might get through the gate on time, but be 15 minutes late to your machine; or in one place where I worked (on the 13th floor) there were so few lifts that it would often take thirty minutes waiting for one, at the beginning and end of the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a similar problem in that im expected to stay late for cashing off, part of my job that im forced to do for free!! its not on but what can you do!! and people who say you should be grateful for a job are silly, regardless of what people say there ARE plenty of jobs out there!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought there were more imporaatnt things to worry about,as for the comment about we the workers what do you think management do its just a different type of wor> we all work some of us are lucky to have easier jobs than others some work more hours than others, do management clock in? pos not but i bet they dont finish and start at the same time every day and do more hours than their contracts say. If you like the job in general and it pays a reasonable wage put up with it if not look for somthing else.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...