Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pay and go default?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4446 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Back in 2009 I took out an 18 month contract with O2 for a Nokia Mobile phone. At the end of that period rather than paying the normal rate I had the contract terminated and requested the number continue with a pay and go scheme until I decide which new contract to take out. At the time I was considering the iPhone 3s but wasn't sure. I was offered a cheap deal of approximately £10 for XXX minutes and XXX texts per month (I can't remember the exact details, it's a while ago now) rather than paying a set amount for calls and texts. Which made sense so I opted for that.

 

Eventually I took out an iPhone contract and after several months of overlap between the two phones I eventually stopped the payments on the old pay and go phone. This was early 2011.

 

I have recently had an unexpected expense which I have tried to get a cheap loan for and been refused. This was highly strange as even getting a current loan topped up was refused. This top up was equivalent to an additional £14 per month when I have £850 of available cash per month after all the usual outgoings are taken from my net income.

 

I registered with creditexpert to find out my credit rating and was shocked to find that O2 had registered a default against me on 15th January of this year. It turns out that O2 had not provided me with the pay and go that I had requested but instead had opened something called a simplicity contract. Which apparently needed a months notice to cancel.

 

Not only was it not explained to me that I was not being offered something that wasn't a pay and go. But I wasnt informed that this needed to be cancelled in this way. I have not received any letters from O2 requesting any payments or from a debt collect they say was called in. I have also not been contacted on my current contract with them concerning this either.

 

The amount outstanding was only £13.96!!!!!

 

What can I do to get this removed? Apart from a couple of late payments to Next this is the only blot on my credit report and is having a massive effect on me at the moment since I've had to put the expense on my credit card with astronomical APR in comparison.

 

It's also obvious from the amount that if it had been brought to my attention it would have been paid anyway since its such a trivial amount.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the O2 website for pay and go. simplicity is a pay and go option. So I'm at an even bigger loss as to how they think I could have owed them anything?

 

w w w.o2.co.uk/tariffs/payandgo

 

Sorry about the break in www but not allowed to post links apparently until I've done 10 posts? :-)

Edited by Scottman72
Added link
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

January this year seems a strange time to add a default from early 2011. That's nearly a year late.

 

Have you tried contacting O2 to find out what this is for?

 

£13.96 is a strange amount. If this was ex vat for a months contract that would be the equivalent of £16.75 or £16.40 depending on what the vat rate was at the time.

 

Have you tried contacting O2 to find out what this was for?

 

Have you printed a copy of your CRA report in case the default suddenly disappears?

 

The lack of correspondence is worrying.

 

I would be inclined to find out what O2 say this is for (and possibly send a SAR) then send a 7 day LBA demanding £5000 compensation for publishing their libelous comments that you owed them £13.96 and for that causing you financial loss, then take out a small claim & sue the *******s

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simplicity is a contact. Personally I would argue that they failed in their duties by not making you aware this was outstanding and they missold the contact as you wantet PAYG. Ask if they will remove it. Do this in writing as I doubt you will get to speek with someone senior enough to be able to make this descision. Follow their complaints procedure set out HERE

 

If that fails, you could email the CEO [email protected]

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simplicity is a contact.

 

I suspect that you are correct, but when I read the info I was convinced that it was PAYG and didn't require notice to end it. I looked at the T&Cs and couldn't see anything (must get my cataract fixed).

 

If the OP asked for PAYG & got simplicity and wasn't made aware of (or understand) any cancellation requirements then this is the fault of O2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...