Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. Anyway I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hi, would like some help re Robinson Way and Statur Barred Please


CALLYX
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4485 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I had an account with Next that I couldn't pay some years ago, then I started getting letters from Robinson Way regarding this debt, been a long term lurker on here, I sent them the CCA letter, they have never produced a CCA or Statements.

 

I keep an eye on my credit file and the Next Debt dropped off in January this year, it showed I had defaulted in December 1996 so a week or so ago I sent the statue barred letter I found posted on here.

 

Could anybody help regarding their reply please

 

Dear Mrs xxxx

 

Further to your recent communication we do not accept that the above account is time barred under the limitation act.

 

Even were you to demonstrate that this debt is time barred, the debt still legally exists and may be reported accordingly to the credit reference bureaux, as appropriate.

 

We are prepared, however, to offer you a substantial reduction to settle this account once and for all. Should you be interested in taking up this option, please telephone us on the above number.

 

Now I'm a tiny bit worried I have jumped the gun a bit so any help, advise, whatever would be great.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they wont accept its statute barred otherwise they admit they cant chase you for the money, if it wasn't statute barred why offer the substantial reduction??? They know its unenforceable they are clutching at straws with threats I would just keep the letter, and ignore Robbers Way, its dropped off credit file so it is statute barred they know they have unenforceable debt and need the cash. I would ignore them personally and certainly dont ring them about their kind offer. Be brave

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I remeber it was two or three months before they defaulted me so prob September/October 1996, maybe a bit before? Can't tell exactly as it is longer on my credit report. Should have taken a bit more notice I suppose. Sorry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if it is that long ago and no written acknowledgement has been made in a clear period of six years then it is SB.

 

You should write to them and tell them that it is SB and that no payment will be forthcoming. Once they have been told this they must stop chasing under OFT guidelines.

 

Are you in Scotland or elsewhere?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Padja, I've ignored them for so long, letters just sent back and forth, no response to my request for a CCA or anything else, just used to get a letter about once every two months or so. I honestly thought they have taken me to court before now. I won't speak to them, that is one thing I have learnt from being a lurker lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if it is that long ago and no written acknowledgement has been made in a clear period of six years then it is SB.

 

You should write to them and tell them that it is SB and that no payment will be forthcoming. Once they have been told this they must stop chasing under OFT guidelines.

 

Are you in Scotland or elsewhere?

 

ims

 

 

Yes ims it is that long ago or maybe even longer, so I just should write what you say and leave it at that. If they continue to write should I report them?

No I am not in Scotland, just sunny North Yorkshire

Thank you for taking the time to reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if it were me I'd ignore them and see what their next move is.

 

By the way, although the debt legally exists it cannot be enforced in court so as long as the SB criterial are fulfilled there is nothing they can do to you.

 

The only reason I asked about Scotland is that the law is different in that the debt is extinguished after 5 years.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if it is that long ago and no written acknowledgement has been made in a clear period of six years then it is SB.

 

You should write to them and tell them that it is SB and that no payment will be forthcoming. Once they have been told this they must stop chasing under OFT guidelines.

 

Are you in Scotland or elsewhere?

 

ims

 

I have sent the SB letter which I think says what you say I should say and I have noticed in this letter they haven't made any threats or directly asked for payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even were you to demonstrate that this debt is time barred, the debt still legally exists and may be reported accordingly to the credit reference bureaux, as appropriate.

 

Besides the fact you don't have to demonstrate that the alleged debt is Statute Barred, the onus is on them to prove that it isn't, they cannot record it on your credit file.

 

That letter warrants a complaint to Trading Standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello again

 

I have received another letter regarding this debt, it states "that before Court Action is considered we may arrange for a local collector to call at your address" and "Your account may be sent to our local collector in 10 days time"

 

It gives me an option to call them to agree an affordable repayment plan.

 

I am now going to report them, but as my complaint may not be looked into straight away, I would like to reply to this letter asking them to prove it is NOT statue barred, does anybody have an idea of what to write so I do not look stupid. I just want this situation closed.

 

Thank you for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've sent the Statute Barred letter & they've ignored it and continued to pursue without proving it's not SB which is against OFT guidelines. Ignore them but you should complain to Trading Standards via; http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Dl1/Directories/UsefulContactsByCategory/Governmentcitizensandrightscontacts/DG_195948

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes complain to trading standards you've done your bit, all this letter is trying to do is to get a response so they can carry on with the threat-o-grams, once they realise you wont be responding they will stop bothering you.

I know my rights Mr DCA I'm with the CAG......hello hello where you gone Mr DCA8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they've been told it's SB and you won't be paying, and they are still threatening you, then definitely complain. I highly doubt they will send a doorstep collector, if they do just tell them to go away. They have no rights and there's no requirement to speak to them. Robbingscum Way are just threatening you in the hop you'll crack. Complain about them to Trading Standards, OFT and FOS, then carry on ignoring their efforts to bully you into paying. They'd be idiotic to try and take you to court, but if they do the SB status is a complete defense and it'll be thrown out in your favour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...