Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I've been reading the invaluable advice on this forum and reading about the problems with Evri and lost delivery of items.  From what I gather the initial steps after having exhausted every's own lost item claim process is to draft a Letter of Claim, I think it is called and to register with the government Money Claims.  I have got a login for Money Claims and have made an initial stab at the letter but I'm not certain I have got it right. Am I right to assume that having exhausted Evri customer service's claims process and having received the denial of any compensation because the laptop I was sending is on the non-compensatory list that my next step would be to send the Letter of Claim to them? Let me provide some basic details which I hopefully have addressed in the letter. I purchased a laptop through Amazon.co.uk which a business in Belfast sold refurbished laptops through.  They had a 30 day money back guarantee for a full refund if you have any issues with the laptop.  I have the invoice from Amazon showing the purchase.  On 27 April, 2024 before the end of the 30 day period I used their ParcelShop (inside a Tesco) to send the laptop back and have the tracking reference mentioned in the letter.  As mentioned in the letter there was they advised they could not give me or sell me any insurance because laptops are on the non-compensatory list so I just paid the normal delivery cost.  It was scanned as leaving the ParcelShop on 29 April and the tracking has been like that ever since.  After a 28 working day Evri claim process they gave the expected response that they could not provide any compensation and simply could not proceed with my claim. I was hoping to get some advice on whether I go ahead now and email this to Customer Services straightaway and should I send a hard-copy to the Evri address as well?  Or are there any steps I have missed out on first?  I believe 14 days is the reasonable period of time for them to respond so if I were to send it tomorrow, for example 12 June then I should expect a reply by 26 June, is that correct and fair?  And assuming they don't reply with a full refund then I would then go down the government Money Claims site to proceed with that? Sorry for all the questions, I want to make sure I go about it properly.  I'll continue to read through other cases on here so I can get an even better handle on the process. I attached a LOC, happy for any edits or updates that will make it even better. Thanks so much for anyone's help! Regards, Matt Evri letter of claim.docx
    • The date was 3 June. Get on MCOL now. The legal principle is that, even if you defence is late, if the other party hasn't requested judgement, then your defence takes priority and is accepted. You might be in time. When I say now I mean now.  Recently we had someone who was nine days' late and this was pointed out to them at 5:30pm.  They faffed around till 11pm.  When they went on MCOl they saw that judgement had been entered at 7pm. Every minute is vital. File the below standard defence if you still can - 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle]. 2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.    4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.  6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Hi friends,  I’m a bit worried I may have got confused with timings here. I thought I had 33 days from my acknowledgment to submit a defence but the date added above says 3/6/24.   have I missed the date?   if so how can I apply for an exception due to my disability and problems with deadlines and dates etc (ADHD)?   what should I submit as a defence?   I’ve had no reply from BW so far    just been back on MCOL and it says 28 days from service if I completed an acknowledgment of service so does that mean 28 days from that of acknowledgement (I.e. 16/5) which would make deadline for defence 14/6?   Thanks! Panicking here.
    • Normally we don't advise playing your cards early in a snotty letter, but as you have appealed we might as well use what you wrote in the appeal against them. There is no rush, you have until 6 July to get it to them.  See what the other regulars think too. How about something like this? -   Dear Rachael & Sean, cheers for your Letter of Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea you'd actually thought I'd take such tripe seriously and would cough up! As usual you'll have been too bone idle to do any due diligence.  Had you done so you would have seen that I appealed to your client.  Indeed the driver on the day is a textbook example of having done exactly what you should do when you do not wish to be bound by the T&Cs in a private car park. Of course none of that mattered to the spivs you represent but do you really want to put such a useless case in front of a judge? To be fair, your clients are very useful members of the human race - as comedians.  How I loved the page turner of their antics at The Citrus Building in Bournemouth.  It was chuckle after chuckle reading about them, letter after letter, month after month, insisting they were legally in the right, even through someone who had done just the first day of a GCSE law course could have told them they weren't.  Until the denouement - BOOM - an absolute hammering in court.  In fact - SLAM, BANG - managing to lose twice against the same motorist for the same car park in front of two different judges. Your client can either drop their foolishness now or get yet another tolchocking* in court where I will go for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) and spend the dosh on a nice summer holiday, while every day laughing at your clients' expense. I look forward to your deafening silence. COPIED TO COUNTRYWIDE PARKING MANAGEMENT LTD   *  This word is used under licence from Brassnecked
    • Well yes, ... and the tax dodgers ... Trump May Owe $100 Million From Double-Dip Tax Breaks, Audit Shows A previously unknown focus of an I.R.S. audit is a dubious accounting maneuver that effectively meant taking the same write-offs twice on a Chicago skyscraper. nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Announcement: ESA claimants now have the option of having their WCA recorded


ErikaPNP
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3653 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

yes to a degree, however there is situations where some aids have to be disregarded, in this case it can be about walking. eg. if a specialist has deemed a wheelchair as unsuitable for use, the ATOS assessor is supposed to not assess based on ability to mobilise in a wheelchair. Of course the ATOS assessor can choose to disagree with a specialist and then still assess based on mobilising in a wheelchair.

 

Also the bit I posted about walking was from the DLA handbook.

 

Yes I had the wheelchair issue disregarded as it would not be suitable for me - but then I'd gone into great detail as to why it wouldn't be suitable on the ESA50.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The Indie 29 August 12:

 

'Atos has 98 recording machines ......'

 

98 - 11 (assuming the broken ones are now repaired) = 87 new machines. Wow!!

Between 148 Atos centres. Double wow!! Soon have one per centre.

Are we convinced:?::?:

Can we justify this expense to the taxpayer:?::?:

 

A cynical Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

If it also messes up ATOS' deadlines for getting everyone off IB, that's an even bigger bonus. In fact, I believe earlier in this thread I suggested that everyone going through reassessment should ask for a recording because they definitely have nothing to lose.

 

could i take my own duel recording equipment and give the hcp a copy on completion of the medical???

Link to post
Share on other sites

tony1512:

 

Errr ...... probably not. Even if you do have your personal sound engineer in tow. The procedure for audio recorded messicals changed late last year. Revised guidance finally made it into the Atosssers' work capability assessment handbook on 5 July 12.

 

Current procedure for getting one's messical audio recorded?

Read the preceeding thirty-five pages of this thread and you'll be as wise as the rest of us. Or not. Every statement from DWATO contradicts its' predecessor.

 

'everyone going through reassessment should ask for a recording'?

 

My personal opinion is that everyone going through reassessment, or initial assessment, who wants an audio record of their interview should ask for it. Not everyone wants, or can wait for, an audio record because of:

Being stuck on assessment rate employment and support for months on end.

The sheer stress of fighting for an audio recorded messical.

Not feeling comfortable with being recorded or the sound of one's own voice.

 

Should you be facing an Atos appointment that you want recorded;

Good luck, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

tony1512:

 

Errr ...... probably not. Even if you do have your personal sound engineer in tow. The procedure for audio recorded messicals changed late last year. Revised guidance finally made it into the Atosssers' work capability assessment handbook on 5 July 12.

 

Current procedure for getting one's messical audio recorded?

Read the preceeding thirty-five pages of this thread and you'll be as wise as the rest of us. Or not. Every statement from DWATO contradicts its' predecessor.

 

'everyone going through reassessment should ask for a recording'?

 

My personal opinion is that everyone going through reassessment, or initial assessment, who wants an audio record of their interview should ask for it. Not everyone wants, or can wait, for an audio record because of:

Being stuck on assessment rate employment and support for months on end.

The sheer stress of fighting for an audio recorded messical.

Not feeling comfortable with being recorded or the sound of one's own voice.

 

Should you be facing an Atos appointment that you want recorded;

Good luck, Margaret.

 

 

unfortunatly i am not in the position of being able to wait. as i missed a medical. so now i have only had 2 crisiss loan totaling £160 since june, and been refused another on the basis that the original person who sanctioned me has decided he was not wrong. so i am not entitled to any money from them until i go to independant apeal. my medical is for a new claim that they have told me probably will not be successful as it is for the same reasons as my original claim( severe depression. and agrophobia)

they told me to claim jsa, but would be turned down because i am clearly not fit for work. and if i claim jsa i would be admitting i dont need esa.

dammed if i do, dammed if i dont.

if they turn me down on wednesday. for sure i am going to be another statistic, because if i dont kill myself. i will die from starvation.

so please please please.... do as they tell you. or the punishment will be severe.

Edited by tony1512
Link to post
Share on other sites

tony1512:

 

This is going to be short and sweet cos I should've been elsewhere like fifteen minutes ago.

 

Trawl back through the pages of this thread and you'll find my plan B, which is taking notes. The Atossers don't like it but even they admit it's legal. You may have to wave the relevant pages of section 4 of their handbook at the assessor.

(Copy of the handbook on the Work n Pensions website.)

 

Should you be technology literate (I'm not, but trying to learn in case I need it) this thread also discusses covert recording for them as can cope with it. Like notes, it's legal, but unfairly, it carries a risk of Atos saying you failed to attend if you're caught.

 

Best wishes, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

If writing notes get a companion to do it, as I am fairly sure someone writing notes who is been assessed would be found fit for work just on that basis alone.

 

There are many self employed secretaries that take shorthand for a reasonable fee. Writing notes longhand will take time and important bits could be missed - shorthand is much better.

Plus you can call her/him as a witness to the Tribunal if necessary to verify the contents of those notes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Employing secretaries, witnesses, paying for doctors letters, medical records. How long before we see 'getting you through your WCA, and appeal' insurance?

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

'getting you through your WCA, and appeal' insurance:

 

According to Mr Duncan Smith we've already got it. Can't remember where, but I read one newspaper article wherein he was moaning that, 'the site we don't mention' offers refunds if an application for a disability benefit is unsuccessful. :der:

 

We wish.

 

Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Guardian 3 September 12:

 

Among the comments;

 

'They insisted on recording it (an Atos assessment)...... At the conclusion of the 'examination' the machine gave an error message.' The asessor refused to test the playback claiming it would breach data protection.

 

:mmph: A genuine mistake? Or their latest 'get out' clause? :mmph:

 

:suspicious: Margaret.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

This acknowledgment particularly caught my eye me amongst a number of reluctant responses to well-aimed FoI requests finally produced a tthe WDTK site today

 

" If a claimant states that s/he wishes to record theirWCA using their own equipment, for example mobile phone, the HCPwill offer to reschedule the WCA for another day when Atos recording equipment is available." (DWP)

 

From:-

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/126477/response/313874/attach/3/3712%203229%20Mr%20Slater%20Response.pdf

 

Please note:

 

1. The circumstances concerned are that a claimant ('all innocent'), without prior communication about recording, turns up saying he or she wants to record – e.g. on a mobile phone.

 

2. The HCP must proceed as the DWP has stated above – because the now well-known case CIB/3117/ 2008 says they have to do at least that.

 

3. The claimant thus secures a deferral of the WCA. DWATO have no option.

 

4. According, again, to CIB/3117/2008, in these circumstances, the advice as to how the rescheduled WCA can be recorded must be given to the claimant IN WRITING. (And given the communication inadequacies of DWATO that could take a very long time indeed.)

 

5. However, the DWP has not advised claimants at large and in advance in writing about the current recording rules and does not want to - because that would alert far more claimants than they can handle to their entitlement to a recording. So the DWP are hoist with their own petard.

 

The proper and fair way out for all concerned is for DWATO fully and clearly to advise claimants of their rights ,no later than when submitting a claim - new or 'renewal' - rather than remaining 'screwed-shut'. But they dare not, and have not these past several years.

 

So, er, 'use a screwdriver' on them.

Edited by nolegion
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

:And in another reluctant response from whatdotheyknow:

 

Relevant to those of us who've already requested an audio record of a messical;

 

'If audio recording has been arranged for an assessment, is it standard practice to send the claimant written confirmation?'

 

(DWATO's SPG, not mine)

'It is not practise for claimants to be issued with a letter to confirm that their work capability assessment would be recorded, as it is confirmed when the claimant contacts Atos Healthcare to confirm that they will be attending the appointment at the Medical Assessment Centre.' :der:

 

As to why some, but not all, claimants get letters:?: Further fudge:?:

 

And allegedly; only '9 requests for audio recordings have been turned down, which were due to the unavailability of recording equipment ......' :der:

 

:mad2: Margaret :mad2:

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

This acknowledgment particularly caught my eye me amongst a number of reluctant responses to well-aimed FoI requests finally produced a tthe WDTK site today

 

" If a claimant states that s/he wishes to record theirWCA using their own equipment, for example mobile phone, the HCPwill offer to reschedule the WCA for another day when Atos recording equipment is available." (DWP)

 

From:-

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/126477/response/313874/attach/3/3712%203229%20Mr%20Slater%20Response.pdf

 

Please note:

 

1. The circumstances concerned are that a claimant ('all innocent'), without prior communication about recording, turns up saying he or she wants to record – e.g. on a mobile phone.

 

2. The HCP must proceed as the DWP has stated above – because the now well-known case CIB/3117/ 2008 says they have to do at least that.

 

3. The claimant thus secures a deferral of the WCA. DWATO have no option.

 

4. According, again, to CIB/3117/2008, in these circumstances, the advice as to how the rescheduled WCA can be recorded must be given to the claimant IN WRITING. (And given the communication inadequacies of DWATO that could take a very long time indeed.)

 

5. However, the DWP has not advised claimants at large and in advance in writing about the current recording rules and does not want to - because that would alert far more claimants than they can handle to their entitlement to a recording. So the DWP are hoist with their own petard.

 

The proper and fair way out for all concerned is for DWATO fully and clearly to advise claimants of their rights ,no later than when submitting a claim - new or 'renewal' - rather than remaining 'screwed-shut'. But they dare not, and have not these past several years.

 

So, er, 'use a screwdriver' on them.

 

 

Good post, nolegion! Permission to copy to other disability groups, please? :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ATOS booking staff are still routinely saying that home assessments cannot be recorded. This is not true, some assessments have already been recorded and mine was booked as a recorded assessment and confirmed as such on the appointment letter, though it hasn't actually happened yet.

 

Whether your assessment is at home or not though, if you have asked for a recorded assessment and your appointment letter (appointments must be confirmed in writing) doesn't state that your assessment will be recorded you can

 

1. turn up anyway (or let the doc turn up) and tell them you're going to record using your phone/MP3/whatever. If they have arranged for recording equipment they tell you there's no need and your assessment goes ahead. If not, they'll then offer you a 'proper' recorded assessment, you go home (or the doc leaves) and wait for the appointment. How long you wait does seem to depend upon area.

 

2. phone them to check and ask for confirmation in writing if they say they'll have to cancel and reschedule.

 

3. email customer services to check.

 

4. record covertly.

 

Which option you choose may depend upon how much you enjoy wasting ATOS' time (and your own), how much you trust what ATOS booking staff say on the phone, and to a certain extent how long you can afford to wait for your benefit to be paid at the proper rate.

 

In my opinion, you should always get everything in writing from ATOS and if you ask for written confirmation it never seems to turn up, so I'm now using email. Customer services might trying to tell you they can't rearrange appointments on your behalf, but if you're persistent they do do it eventually.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Everything in writing:

 

Can't over empathise the importance of everything in writing to and from Atos, one way or another;

 

Snail mail, signed for if you can afford it cos even if it doesn't get there you can prove it was sent.

 

Or, print the electronic mails.

 

During the last five years or so, a friend and I've had three failure to attend disputes, all of them caused by DWATO errors. We've won every one of them cos we've had a paper trail to sling at Jobcentreplus.

 

One of the incidents gave us a laugh. Out of the blue, and nine months after the event, I received a disallowance notice. My paperchase was safely filed away. The paperchase the decision maker thought she needed had been sent into Work n Pensions storage and couldn't be retreived. :biggrin:

 

So ...... everything in writing. You may, more likely will, need it.

 

Sincerely, Margaret. :flame:

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry to seem a little thick here, but what does DWATO means....?

Drop the P from DWP and the S from ATOS put them together and you get DWATO

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, as i said, got a lot of health issues at the mo and my brain will not engage at all................................... either that or I am am getting old........lol :lol:

Keefy (:-)The "Moaner":rolleyes:)Boy

Prepared to take on anyone until I win...................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...