Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice about pension credit and savings allowance


beenjamin4
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4463 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

I need some advice regarding my finances please.I have recently been awarded pension credit Guarantee Credit.at the moment I have just about £2000 in savings and this has been declared.but I am about to sell my house and buy a smaller property this will leave me with around £25000 over from the sale.as I understand it there is no upper limit to savings as far as council tax benefit is concerned.

as for the pension credit I receive just under £12 on top of the state pension to make it up to the Guarantee ammount of £137.35 a week.

my question is I will need to spend some of this money getting the new house sorted ie: replace kitchen.new roof. new boiler, replace carpets etc I estimte I will spend at least £12/£15000.plus the actual moving costs ,legal fees etc

so I expect to be down to under the upper savings limit within a year or so , will they consider i have deprived myself of the money in order to qualify for benefit.I am not really sure what is considered reasonable spending.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be best to contact the Pensions service

and ask what the implications are.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is something about the money being ignored if it's being used to buy another property.

 

With deprivation of capital, they will look at whether it was done on purpose to claim benefits. It's not just a case of "My savings have gone down" and they claim you've deprived yourself of capital.

 

You need to keep receipts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is something about the money being ignored if it's being used to buy another property.

 

With deprivation of capital, they will look at whether it was done on purpose to claim benefits. It's not just a case of "My savings have gone down" and they claim you've deprived yourself of capital.

 

You need to keep receipts.

 

Thanks for the reply, yes I will keep all receipts

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be best to contact the Pensions service

and ask what the implications are.

 

Thank you

yes that is a good idea in theory but in practice I have found I have rung them with a question and have been told to ring another number then another etc untill I have had to give up frustratd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you sell your house you will need to do a change of address with the Pension Service.... On the form it asks if you owned your former property, They will then ask for a redemption statement from your solicitor, to show the sale and purchase of your new property... Also a statement from the bank account to show the balance left being deposited...

You will have bought and sold a property so I dont know if the capital will be disregarded even if you say its for essential repairs, that would be up to a decision maker.

Bit if your claim is closed and you spend the money on improving the property, keep all receipts, invoices etc.

When you make your claim again before its processed a deprivation of capital decision will then be done

 

If you intend to spend the money in the manner you have described I cant see a problem, if they are essential repairs, but it would be up to a DM to determine if they will be classed as essential or non essential

good luck with the move, a stress in itself :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not certain for Pension Credits but for IS and JSA if you sell a property and have capital from the sale as long as you intend to purchase a further property using that capital it can be ignored for a peiod of up to 52 weeks but this does have to agreed and decided by a decision maker.

If you have essential repairs that are needed then there shouldn't be a problem as long as the cost is considered essential and reasonable, make sure you get the usual number of quotes to get a competetive quote from someone you would feel comfortable with too.

If the capital is not used within the 52 weeks it is then treated as capital which could potentially put you over the capital limits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you sell your house you will need to do a change of address with the Pension Service.... On the form it asks if you owned your former property, They will then ask for a redemption statement from your solicitor, to show the sale and purchase of your new property... Also a statement from the bank account to show the balance left being deposited...

You will have bought and sold a property so I dont know if the capital will be disregarded even if you say its for essential repairs, that would be up to a decision maker.

Bit if your claim is closed and you spend the money on improving the property, keep all receipts, invoices etc.

When you make your claim again before its processed a deprivation of capital decision will then be done

 

If you intend to spend the money in the manner you have described I cant see a problem, if they are essential repairs, but it would be up to a DM to determine if they will be classed as essential or non essential

good luck with the move, a stress in itself :)

 

Thank you very much for your reply it is very helpfull . so as I understand it there are no hard and fast rules it will ultimatley be down to a DM to decide wether or not I would be allowed to update and replace kitchen ,carpets etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not certain for Pension Credits but for IS and JSA if you sell a property and have capital from the sale as long as you intend to purchase a further property using that capital it can be ignored for a peiod of up to 52 weeks but this does have to agreed and decided by a decision maker.

If you have essential repairs that are needed then there shouldn't be a problem as long as the cost is considered essential and reasonable, make sure you get the usual number of quotes to get a competetive quote from someone you would feel comfortable with too.

If the capital is not used within the 52 weeks it is then treated as capital which could potentially put you over the capital limits.

 

 

Thank you for the reply .I will not have the full ammount from the sale of my house as it will go instantly towards the purchase of the smaller house.but I expect to be left with a surplus of around £25000 of which I will probably spend £12/£15000.

so if a DM says I should not have spent the money on the house what happens then ? is there some sort of timescale aas to when the money would have been considered as used in the meantime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your reply it is very helpfull . so as I understand it there are no hard and fast rules it will ultimatle work, be be down to a DM to decide wether or not I would be allowed to update and replace kitchen ,carpets etc.[/quote

 

Yes it would, after the sale and purchase of your new property they might if you state the remainder of the capital is to be spent on essential repairs disregard the capital to you have completed the work, but they may decided you have capital www.scottishlife.co.uk/scotlife/Web/Site/Adviser/TechnicalCentralArea/Rates&FactorsArea/PensionCreditArea/PensionCreditHomePage.asp

 

This may then close your claim. You will then complete the work and spend the capital doing the work

 

You can make a claim as soon as you qualify again, ie you have spent the money

but a deprivation of capital decision will be done,

 

if the spending of the capital is classed as non deprivation, in other words you needed to spend it to make the new home habitable, or esential reapairs, etc, its hard to define :)

then a decision will be made and your new claim paid.

 

But if is deemed you have spent the money to gain entiltlement to benefit then notional capital will be assumed.

 

Say for esample you spend 10k on a hand made Italian leather designer suite, then the DM would say even though you had spend that money, you had a choice you didnt have too, so then capital 0f 10k would be assumed on your claim. Case controls are then put on your claim and every three month or so it goes down in batches of £250. So three months later £9750 would be assumed and so forth till its gone, may take a few years. This means that they would treat you as having 10k for example when you hadnt really because you had spent it on the suite.....

 

So you can reapply as soon as you have spent your capital.

 

Just keep your receipts etc for everything ready for the decision

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all the advice,I do have 1 other question I read somewhere ( I think on these forums ) that if you come into a sum of money, you can not pay off your credit card debts in full just the minimum amount each month.does this rule also apply to pension credit ? as I do have a longstanding credit card debt due to having to use it for day to day living.

Edited by beenjamin4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Is this the guaranteed element of pension credit?

Can you please explain a little more??

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are thinking about offering a variation on

the minimum payment required by the

agreement for instance £1 per month?

If so you should be aware that this would

mean that the account would be closed and

a default can be entered on credit files even

if the reduced payment is agreed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never heard of that rule. after the sale of your house and you have your surplus, if you paid off your credit card, then the DM would look at it when making the deprivation decision.

I cant say they will go with non deprivation on this but I have seen lots of decisions where they have treated repayments of credit cards as non deprivation of capital, in other words allowed it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...