Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A very strange situation please help!!!


shamsa01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4484 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband used to work at sainsbury's while he was a trainee duty manager his company has over paid him for four months and after four months he has been called into the office and HR manger has told him that he has been over paid for four months and that was not my husband's fault and requested to pay back the over paid salary by monthly instalements the figure was 4500 pounds. He requested my husband if he wont pay the money back to the company than the HR manager would lose his job. My husband has agreed to pay 75 pound every month deducted from his salary. After one year my husband has resign from the company. They have deducted his whole salary. and after few months they send him the letter from the court that he owe them 3700 pounds and they are going to take court action which my husband has ignored straight away. The money he owed was stated as a personal loan on the letter. Today he was checking his credit report and saw that debt as a ccj. now first of all my husband has never taken any loan from them and never signed any documents it was their mistake that they have over paid him while he was a trainee duty manager and was not trained in payroll as well. Please advise what can I do to challenge them and get that ccj removed from his file. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read about estoppel.

 

Phone the court quoting the claim number and request copies of all the documents.

Once you get them come back here and we will help you apply for a setaside. - Pretty easy to do.

 

We can have a look at the entire problem once you have all the information

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCJs don't become statute barred.

 

Get all the info and we'll let you know what your chances are.

 

On the basis of your account above, your chances are excellent - but of course we need to know the details

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add that the final outcome could either be that they are estopped from asking for the money back or else they will have to accept instalments without a court judgment

Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine that the credit file would have a note of the claim number so try that.

An SAR to the company is a very good idea. - Essential, in fact.

 

Having ignored the letter is not necessarily a problem.

 

Get all the info and then we'll see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found the case id. and also please explain to me why it appears on the credit report as outstanding public report ,is this same as ccj? Sorry if I am asking a totally silly question.Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband used to work at sainsbury's while he was a trainee duty manager his company has over paid him for four months and after four months he has been called into the office and HR manger has told him that he has been over paid for four months and that was not my husband's fault and requested to pay back the over paid salary by monthly instalements the figure was 4500 pounds. He requested my husband if he wont pay the money back to the company than the HR manager would lose his job. My husband has agreed to pay 75 pound every month deducted from his salary. After one year my husband has resign from the company. They have deducted his whole salary. and after few months they send him the letter from the court that he owe them 3700 pounds and they are going to take court action which my husband has ignored straight away. The money he owed was stated as a personal loan on the letter. Today he was checking his credit report and saw that debt as a ccj. now first of all my husband has never taken any loan from them and never signed any documents it was their mistake that they have over paid him while he was a trainee duty manager and was not trained in payroll as well. Please advise what can I do to challenge them and get that ccj removed from his file. Thanks

 

Firstly, overpaid salary is always going to be overpaid salary, and as such is always going to be recoverable. Because it was their error, they conceded to be repaid at a fixed amount. Your husband paid for 12 months at 75 pounds per month, totalling 900 pounds (presumably), and then chose to leave the job. at which point his final salary was deducted and probably was insufficient to recover the entire debt. Leaving the job did not mean he no longer had to repay the money.

 

It seems a bit odd that your husband didn't notice that he was receiving an overpayment of over 1100 pounds per month when he should have been on a trainee manager's salary - that's quite a substantial difference. Nonetheless, they accepted it was their error, and your husband accepted there was an issue and agreed to repay the money.

 

The bit I have put in bold in the quote above states a letter came from the court, but then states it said they'd take court action. If in fact the letter did come from the court, then you would have had notice of the court case, and as such the likelihood of getting the CCJ set aside is slim.

 

Even if you get the CCJ set aside, your husband will still owe them the money. It was a mistake, theirs admittedly, but the law doesn't allow people to profit from such a mistake - the legal term is unjust enrichment.

 

Now, since Sainsbury's appear to have secured a judgment for the outstanding sum in their favour, it is highly likely that your husband's contract of employment specified that any overpayment in wages, unrecoverable through deduction from future wages, would in fact become a civil debt - and thereby recoverable through the courts. Your husband will need to check his contract of employment.

 

I'd suggest challenging this issue will require the assistance of a legal adviser, either CAB employment adviser, or a solicitor, but for what it's worth, I don't think it's likely that you will 'win'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are few things i need to clear here, while my husband was on training he was doing a lot of over time and he thought that he is getting paid for that but latter the HR manager said that over time does not count towards the salary. And he was not a signed off duty manager at that time . The hours showing on the salary slips was correct and the wage rate was also correct. It was only that instead of salary they were paying him on hourly basis. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your husband's biggest issue here is that he ACCEPTED an error had been made, and for a year he agreed for them to deduct 75 pounds a month to repay the overpayment. Then, presumably when he left and his final salary was deducted, he didn't raise an issue at that point. Your husband then subsequently ignored court paperwork (according to your initial post - if it was just a letter before action, that may be slightly different). When your husband left the employ of Sainsbury's he knew he still owed them money.

 

I am afraid that Sainsbury's has done all that they could to reasonably collect the money, and your husband ignoring them has not helped his situation one tiny bit, and in fact, is highly detrimental. I do not think you can get the judgment set aside on the basis of the information you have provided here. Attempting to do so would require some form of dishonesty on your husband's part - i.e. claiming he did not know a) of the debt and b) of the court action - neither of those are true, and the first is VERY easily shown to be untrue because there are a year of payments plus a final salary deduction that were made with either his consent or his lack of action to prevent it.

 

Sainsbury's, now they are the proud owners of a CCJ, may decide not to enforce recovery - but on the other hand they may decide to enforce, which could mean a charging order on your house (if you own it), an attachment to earnings, bailiffs coming to the house, or bankruptcy (if they think it's worth it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

we have received only one letter from the court and after that nothing.I didnt know about the ccj until today. And the letter didnot say that its a summon or we need to attend court. It only mentioned that sainsburys has filed a case against my husband. My husband is not working,we dont owe a house either. and please let me know if we dont pay ccj when its going to be removed from the file?Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

What EXACTLY does this letter from the court state? Type it out in full - or scan it in, delete identifying information, and post a copy to the thread.

 

Whenexactly did the overpayment occur, i.e. what months/year? What month/year did your husband leave Sainsbury's? What date did you receive the letter from the court?

 

Lastly, again, how much was your husband's usual salary? You state the amount was correct on the wage slip...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt the letter said what you think it did. Courts do not send out letters saying 'action will be taken', they send out letters saying 'here's your court date, PoC to follow' or similar.

 

I doubt the letter will assist you. Re-read what has already been stated - you are unlikely to 'win' given your husband's acceptance, and part repayment, of the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - but things are getting carried away here.

 

Firstly, overpayments are recoverable - subject the rules in estoppel. Please, all of you read up about estoppel which is a very important rule of English law.

 

Secondly, even if papers have been ignored, this is not fatal. If there is an arguable defence which stands a chance of success, then a setaside will be granted.

 

Finally, even if the money has to be repaid, it would be repaid by manageable instalments - and if there is a loan agreement in place as suggested by the company, then they would have to abide by the terms of that loan.

 

If there is a loan agreement which was then breached by the employee, then that changes things, of course but that is not what we are being told here.

 

I'm sorry to say that lot of the comments being made on this thread are plainly wrong and will only cause fear and confusion to the Original Poster here and to others who might need similar advice.

 

I don't think that anymore should be said until the court documents have been obtained and the SAR disclosure has been made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, overpaid salary is always going to be overpaid salary, and as such is always going to be recoverable. Because it was their error, they conceded to be repaid at a fixed amount. Your husband paid for 12 months at 75 pounds per month, totalling 900 pounds (presumably), and then chose to leave the job. at which point his final salary was deducted and probably was insufficient to recover the entire debt. Leaving the job did not mean he no longer had to repay the money.

 

It seems a bit odd that your husband didn't notice that he was receiving an overpayment of over 1100 pounds per month when he should have been on a trainee manager's salary - that's quite a substantial difference. Nonetheless, they accepted it was their error, and your husband accepted there was an issue and agreed to repay the money.

 

The bit I have put in bold in the quote above states a letter came from the court, but then states it said they'd take court action. If in fact the letter did come from the court, then you would have had notice of the court case, and as such the likelihood of getting the CCJ set aside is slim.

 

Even if you get the CCJ set aside, your husband will still owe them the money. It was a mistake, theirs admittedly, but the law doesn't allow people to profit from such a mistake - the legal term is unjust enrichment.

 

Now, since Sainsbury's appear to have secured a judgment for the outstanding sum in their favour, it is highly likely that your husband's contract of employment specified that any overpayment in wages, unrecoverable through deduction from future wages, would in fact become a civil debt - and thereby recoverable through the courts. Your husband will need to check his contract of employment.

 

I'd suggest challenging this issue will require the assistance of a legal adviser, either CAB employment adviser, or a solicitor, but for what it's worth, I don't think it's likely that you will 'win'.

 

Sorry but this is mainly wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...