Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank goodness it's not your roof and you get to foot the bill! How big are these bits of mortar? How often are they falling into your garden? Hourly, daily? Just go ahead with your plans, of course, they're not going to be worried by your time pressures and the urgency of the situation, so simply carry on as you would have done and I'm sure everything will go fine. Unless there is a danger to life and serious structural issues which mean you cannot venture into your garden, then IMHO there is little more you can do less for what you have done so already and made them aware of the issue.
    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

county court claim from an ex employee


voydav
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am in court next week defending a claim against my company.

 

The claiment and myself were given a date by the court to file our relavent papers to the court and each other.

 

The claiment was late filing the papers to my self which I can prove as was sent registered post.

 

I hand delivered mine to claiments office.

 

My question is I have received an e-mail from claiment asking for me to send my bundle to him for court next week do i have to send again?

 

Any advice etc would be appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If hand delivered I presume you didnt ask for a receipt then?

I personally would just comply and exchange again wouldn't want this to be held against you even though very frustrating.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi I am the defendant in a pending County Court Claim.

 

Received paperwork from Court asking for things to be carried out by certain times.

 

I am not sure of one request which is;

 

"Each party shall give standard disclosure to every other party by list. Any requests for inspection or copies of disclosed documents shal be made within 7 days after sevice of the list."

 

Could somebody translate into common speak please

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi you need to down load and complete form n265 and attach a list of all documents that you want to refer to in your case. List letters and their date. When you get the claimants list you then have 7 days to request to either see or receive a copy of any documents listed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I am the defendant in a county court claim.

I have filled my defence as requested and the court has aknowlege receipt.

The claimant and I were given directions by the court,

 

one being that by the 28th December we must both give standard disclosure by list.

 

I received an email today from the claimants solicitor of a letter they sent on the 23 december to the court saying that they have not seen a copy of my defence so can not supply disclosure.

 

Since they have had from the 14th November (the day I filed my defence) to ask for a copy can I apply to have the claim struck out?

Thank you

 

Anybody have an opinion please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you would be wasting your time and money. For all you know they have been trying to get a copy from the court since 14 November. Actually you are in breach of Part 15.6 of the CPR by not serving them with a copy yourself, and given that the court requires the parties to co-operate, the court would expect you to let them have a copy now rather than take the nuclear option of an application to strike out (which I suspect would go down badly with the judge).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

little backgound:

I received a county court claim from an ex employee. claim was made against myself personally.

I informed claiments solicitor who then put in a second claim with me as 1st defendant and my Ltd company as the 2nd defendant.

 

Two defences were filled as per instructions from the county court.

 

Court sent out directions to all parties 1st one being that by 27th December each party shall give standard disclosure by list to other party.

 

On the 23rd December 2011 I received an email from claimants solicitor stating that, as he had not received a copy of defence that he would not be subbmitting claiments standard disclosure.

 

I as instructed sent my disclosure to claimants solicitor as directed by the court.

 

I did not receive anything from the claimant.

 

I informed the court in writing that the claimant had failed as instructed to give their standard disclosure by list.

 

Today I received an email from claimants solicitor requesting to see documents in my standard disclosure.

 

What should I do?

 

I still have not received anything from claimant and feel it a little unfair that I do not have any chance to see any of claimants paperwork,

 

although I do not want to put myself in a postition of not carrying out the court directions.

 

Im not sure if the solicitor is playing games as he knows i am not using a solicitor myself.

 

This is because, I did contact a solicitor at the begining and he informed me that the claimant is under a fixed fee arrangement and has not taken out insurance for himself.

 

This means that I cannot claim any costs back from him.

 

Any advice would be very much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

This means that I cannot claim any costs back from him.

 

I'm not sure that that advice is correct. Hopefully more advice will come but according to court procedures :- Under English law, the legal costs of a court action are paid by the loser.

In small claims track you can only claim costs if the other party acted unreasonably and it can be proven as such and the final decision is up to the judge. In accordance with CPR 27.14[2][g].

I suppose it all depends on whether the claim is substantiated or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's for your reply I think it looks like I may have to seek solicitors advice.

 

What I urgently need advice on though is what should I do about claimants solicitor not providing disclosure as directed by the court and that he is now requesting to see all my paperwork. I feel that I am showing all my cards on the table, surely this can't be right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to the claimants solicitor to inform him that if I did not receive their standard disclosure that I would contact the court to strike out the claim.

 

The claimants solicitor is claiming that he has not received a copy of my defence and this is the reason that he has not forwarded their disclosure

 

He is also claiming I am in breach of civil procedure rules and that I am acting in an unreasonable manner.

 

I do not want to fall foul of the judge so would it be best for me to send another copy of my defence to him first.

I

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi have posted a couple of threads and had helpful responses.

 

I'm defending a claim being made agaist me.

 

The district judge made alist of orders that were to be done by certain dates.

 

The claimants solicitor was over a month late serving their disclosure by list to me.

 

Now the claimants solicitor has failed to file their witness statement by the given date.

 

I have contacted the court who advised that I put it in writing to the court which I have done.

 

The order only says that an automatic strike out will happen if the Pre trail check lists are not filed on time.

 

Do I wait to see if the claimant fails to do this, or should I apply for strike out now.

 

Thanks for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

difficult to say on what's posted.

the court is on notice re claimants failures to comply. it is doubtful that there would be a strike out atm (you will note that that the listing q. (pre trial checklist) asks whether any directions have not been complied with, and if so why not?). the court is currently aware of their lateness. up to you though.

on receipt of listing q court will have the discretion to direct as they think fit in the circumstances. if claimant doesn't comply with listing in time then yes auto struck, 'or some other sanction imposed'?

see what others say

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I am defending a claim and to date the claimants solicitor was over a month late

Serving their directions.

 

Now the claimant has failed to serve their witness statement.

 

The directions made by the judge only say that if the pre-trial check list is late that the claim will struck out.

 

This is due beginning of March.

 

I have contacted the court who told me to put in writing the details of the claimants late filing.

 

Do I wait to see if the claiment files their Pre trail check list or do I go for strike out now.

 

I feel a little disadvantaged that I have sent all my witness statement to the claiments solicitor with nothing back

 

Thanks for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for quick reply.

 

I think I see if they file pre trail questionnaire.

 

My feeling is that after reading my witness statement they realise their claim is weak.

 

Their list of directions that I eventually got amounted to 3 bits of paper that had no real relevance to their claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...