Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry but first of all you are still referring to your six-month right to reject – but you didn't assert your right within six months so this is not relevant. The situation is that you cannot reject the vehicle unless it is a write off or you have been deprived of the use of it for a significant period of time so that it can be said that you have been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the contract. By my understanding that is not the case here. Your complaint must be that they are in breach of contract because the vehicle is not satisfactory quality. Clearly because of the way the windscreen was fitted it was not satisfactory quality when it was purchased and it has not remained in satisfactory condition for a reasonable period of time – witness the leakage and the corrosion in the car. On this basis you are holding them responsible for the cost of repairs which are £XXX and any ancillary costs reasonably incurred as a result of their breach of contract. You are currently without the car and this is not a situation which can continue. You are enclosing the evidence plus quotations for repair and you want that by the end of the week you want them to agree to the repairs. Broadly that. Please post a draft as soon as possible. You don't want to hang around on this
    • Hello folks  Got a letter from overdales the day after I submitted my defence this contains a copy of credit card agreement and a letter stating the account has been sold to lowell. H
    • Seen a number of videos online of interviews with people in town centres around the UK. Those that say they will vote Reform can accurately be described as 'Gammon Faced'. So frustrated with life in 2024 and yearning to switch the clock back many decades, they don't really care about the policies of Reform. What appears to appeal to them about Reform is an old fashioned nostalgic outlook, of trying to get the country back to how it was a very long time ago. Yes much of this is about immigration, but it is also about many other issues such as Equalities legislation, Human Rights etc, which they believe have gone too far. For the above reasons, I don't think many who are looking to vote Reform, will switch their votes back to other parties they have voted for before. From what I have seen in polling, 70% were previously Tory and about 30% Labour. The Tories under Sunak can no longer appeal to those who now back Reform. For example, I doubt any Tory Government would support leaving ECHR, because that would most likely be opposed by the majority in the UK. And many Tory MP's would not support leaving ECHR and the House of Lords would block anyway ignoring any conventions to give way to The Commons. A combination of Brexit, Reform lead by Farage and the average age of this voter demographic is quite likely to lead to the extinction of The Conservative party. What may happen after this election is that the right of politics splits into new groups. Some Tory MP's are likely to jump ship and join Reform. And others will try to relaunch the Conservative brand as a centre right modern party. This could possibly lead to the Lib Dems becoming main opposition party at some point. The outcome of this election could well significantly change UK politics forever. And it is not just about the future of the Tories, Labour with a huge majority may find it difficult to keep some on the left happy with Government progress on tackling some issues. So we may see a fracture within Labour support and new parties formed.  
    • Desperation. They must think people have forgotten what Johnson was like as PM. Tories turn to Boris to combat Farage threat WWW.TELEGRAPH.CO.UK Former PM signs letters to wavering voters amid warning Labour could be in power for a generation if support goes to Reform  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC OD issues


Angel104
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5797 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Which time limit are you refering to ?

After 12+2 WORKING days the agreement is in default and payments can be stopped.

After a further MONTH they have commited a summary criminal offence.

 

Now my advice is to wait until they demand payment then make a report to Trading Standards about this matter.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent of a CCA request to a firm of debt collectors last week. While I was out today they left a message on my answering machine saying they wished to discuss the matter over the phone. They said if I wanted to avoid legal action I had to phone them at once. I have not telephoned them as I am not sure what I should do next. Can someone please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am new but the general say on this site is "Never call them put everything in writing".

I would ignore them and what till there 12+2 is up then the ball is in your court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be frank, i'ld actually call them and ask if they've got the requested agreement, then when they say no tell them that it's them who're in trouble.

 

But, that's me.

 

Otherwise sit & wait for the default.

 

Regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Angel, once they have received your CCA request it effectively stops any

chance of them taking legal action until they have complied with your request.

 

You could write to them stating that you will only deal with them in writing and if they phone you again, you will report them for harassment. Then ask them on what basis they are considering legal action. Just that no more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent of a CCA request to experto credite- did not hear anything and they are now in deafault. They left a message on my answering machine yesterday asking me to call which I did'nt. Then today they left another message on my answering machine saying that they are not prepared to send the CCA because in their opinion it would be a waste of time. What do I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then today they left another message on my answering machine saying that they are not prepared to send the CCA because in their opinion it would be a waste of time. What do I do now?

 

Take the tape to Trading Standards! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

HSBC turned our overdraft into a loan we even signed paperwork. Experto credite have been demanding money and I sent off for a CCA and got no response. Now today they have telephoned and told me that because the loan comes under a current bank account it is not classified as a loan so therefore there is no credit agreement to send. I tried to explain that what we were given was a HSBC flexiloan and he said it made difference and according to him the CAB would tell me the same. Is this true?

Link to post
Share on other sites

HSBC turned our overdraft into a loan- we signed agreement papers and the loan went into our current account. When experto credite started demanding money I sent of a CCA request and got no response. Today they informed me that as the loan went into a current bank account it is not covered by the consumer credit act so therefore we are wrong when we say that it is our legal right to have a copy of the agreement they said the CAB would tell us the same thing is this right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stopped laughing now!

 

The loan agreement CCA request is covered by Section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

77.--(1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for fixed-sum credit, within the

prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and

payment of a fee of 1 Pound, shall give the debtor a copy of the executed

agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement

signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it

is practicable for him to refer,--

(a) the total sum paid under the agreement by the debtor;

(b) the total sum which has become payable under the agreement by the debtor

but remains unpaid, and the various amounts comprised in that total sum,

with the date when each became due; and

© the total sum which is to become payable under the agreement by the debtor,

and the various amounts comprised in that total sum, with the date, or mode

of determining the date, when each becomes due.

(2) If the creditor possesses insufficient information to enable him to ascertain the

amounts and dates mentioned in subsection (1)©, he shall be taken to comply with that

paragraph if his statement under subsection (1) gives the basis on which, under the

regulated agreement, they would fall to be ascertained.

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to--

(a) an agreement under which no sum is, or will or may become, payable by the

debtor, or

(b) a request made less than one month after a previous request under that

subsection relating to the same agreement was complied with.

(4) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)--

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

http://www.crw.gov.uk/resources/consumercreditact1974.pdf

 

A word with Trading Standards won't go amiss either..

Trading Standards Central - Trading Standards and Consumer Protection information for the UK

 

Regards, Dave.

 

cag-end-sig.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Dave says a loan is a loan is a loan and it really doesn't matter that it was as a result of an overdraft. For the purposes of the Act the overdraft is irrelevant.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dave I will contaxct their local trading standards on Monday. Apparently there is a letter on its way to me from experto credite so that will be interesting- if its a demand for payment they can get lost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of interest when did you take out the loan and roughly how much was it for?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the end of the day, what the loan was for is irrelevant, the fact that it was paid out directly to a bank account is none of their business anyway. The fact remains that it is a Section 77 loan, regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and the Statute timescales apply;

77(4) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)--

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

Don't forget to contact your local TS's it's always good to have them onside..

 

Regards, Dave.

 

cag-end-sig.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Story so far. HSBC turned our overdraft into a loan loan documents were signed. Due to financial problems got behind with payments. Got letter demanding money from experto credite- sent of CCA request got no response.

 

Yesterday man at experto credite tried to tell me that a bank current account is not covered by the consumer credit act so therefore they are not legally bound to send anything.

 

This morning got a phone phone call from man at experto credite wanting to know when they can expect a payment I told him that they are getting nothing until I have a copy of agreement.

 

Quote from man on phone: You have already been told that that due to the fact the money went into a current bank account we are not legally bound to send anything as a current account is not covered by the consumer credit act now it is not my fault that you do not have the intelligence to understand what we are saying.

 

Quote from me: No it is you that does not have the intelligence to understand that by law I am entitled to it.

 

Quote from man: The day you went into debt is the day that you lost all your legal rights go to your CAB and they will tell you this.

 

Quote from me: Thank you very much I will be going to see them.

 

Quote from man: Just one question were you really born this stupid!

 

At which point I hung up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume you mean overdrafts and such likes? No, they're not, there is a special provision, I'll see if I can find it, I came across it a while back.

 

Edit: Well, I am not surprised you are getting different answers, since you don't see fit go give all the information! Having just had a quick look to your posts, I take it your question was relating to that loan for which the DCA is pursuing you? In that case, the info Rory and DiskmanDave gave you is totally correct, and you really should give all the relevant info if you don't want to get incorrect responses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying to make sense of it, TBH, Patrick.

 

I know I researched this a few months back, but damn if I can find the info now. However, at this point, it is irrelevant, as OP is asking about a loan (unless I am very much mistaken), so yes, CCA would apply anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...