Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Adam v Nat West ***WON***


lead
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6361 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I trecieved my responce from Cobbetts, they have filed an Acknowledgment of service and have ticked the box "I intend to defend all of this claim". Is this good, bad or normal? has anyone else had this? if so what happened next?

 

I have not sent a list of my charges with the 8% interest to natwest since my Moneyclaim, should I still send it now they have responded and if so who to (natwest or cobbetts)?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HI

 

Ok today was the last day (day 28) before I could apply for judgment and guess what Cobbetts at the very last minute put in a defence. My question now is what happens now and what are my chances of still winning as although I am prepered to go to court on the step by step guide it says that I should have had a refund by now and that this is highly unlikely, is this still the case or have things changed

 

Is any one at this stage or have been through this already and help and advice would be greatly appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Had Cobbetts defence through today, this si what it said:

 

1. This defence is filed and served without prejudice to the defendants case that the particulars of claim do not disclose reasonable grounds for bringing a claim against the claimant to recover the bank charges (and interest theron) referred to in the particulars of claim or any other sum(s). In the event that the claimant does not properly particularise his claim then the defendant will apply to strike out the claim and/or for summary judement in respect of the same.

 

2. On alllocation the defendant invites the court to direct taht there be a case managment conference in order for the court to cansider the making of appropriate orders to give the claimant oppertunity to properly particulise his claim.

 

3 No admissions are made as to what charges have been debited to the claimants bank account

 

4. In relation to the allegation that the contractual provisions pursuant to which the charges have been applied are unenforceable by virtue of the unfair contract terms act 1977 ("UCTA 1977") and/or the Unfair contract term in consumer Regulations 1999 ("the regulations") and/or the common law, the claimant is required to identify:

 

4.1 (a) the section(s) of unfair contract terms act ("UCTA 1977"); (b) the regulations of the unfair contract terms in consumer regulations 1999 ("the regulations"); and © the principles of common law relied upon by the claimant in alleging that the contractual provision(s) reffered to are unenforceable; and

 

4.2 the contractual provision(s) that the claimant allege are invalid by referance to UCTA 1977 and/or teh regulations.

 

Until such time as these sections/regulations/provisions are identified the defendant cannot (save as appears below) plead to allegation reffered to in paragraph 4 above. the defendant therefor reserves its right to plead further to the allegation once (and if) the claimant identifies the relevant contractual information

 

5. Save as hereinbefore appears the defendant joins issues with the claimant on his claim(s) and denies that it is liable to the claimant as alleged or at all

 

 

Can anyone please tell me what I should do next ie. how should I reply? With regards tp para 3 I sent the details of my calim on october 30th recorded delivery and what a suprise they havnt recieved or signed for it, so that is easily sorted, I however dont know whare to start with para 4.

 

I also dont know what para 5 means

 

Can anyone tell me anything about this letter and if it is normal or bad and what I should do next. Has anyone else had a letter simlar??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Today I recieved a letter from Cobbetts with the usual our client considers that my challengers would fail in cort etc however as a good will gesture they offed me £900 (I am claiming £1800)

 

I am just wondering what the best way to reply is to say thanks but no thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something short and to the point along the lines of:

 

Dear [named sender or Sirs]

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx.

 

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, interest and court fees now totalling £xxxx

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes I have just been reading all of the other posts and I am just writing the letter. After reading everyones posts I am feeling quite confident now as alot of other people seem to have had the same responces as me and won

SO FINGERS CROSSED!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks for you advise, Glad to hear that you won, I have read everything twice and still worry im doing it right lol there is nothing better than when you realise other people have had the same responce and won however there is nothing worse than when you read something that is different to the way you have done it lol.

 

I will keep you posted on what happens but hopefully not long now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read it "THRICE", it took me a long time to realise that there are moderators of excellent quality on this site, please use them.

You Will Win, of that I have no doubt, I'll keep on looking at your thread.

cheerio CHRIS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I recieved my court date yesterday for the 23rd January

 

It says that I must send a copy of all documents that I intend to rely on during the hearing to al partys by the 9th January, can anyone help with what I may need.

 

Thanks

 

P.S does anyone know where I can get a copy of the interview it mentions with Peter McNamara in the FAQs

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D I'VE WON!!!:D

JUST PICKED UP MY MAIL AND THERE WAS A CHEQUE FOR MY FULL AMOUNT!!

THANKS FOR EVERYONE WHO HELPED

Good luck to every one else, time to start on my other 3 accounts now!!

MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

CONGRATULATIONS LEAD

 

I bet that was a bit of a surprise being as your court date was not until late Jan. One thing I wanted to ask... you know you said earlier that you put down the 8% on the prelim letter and schedule by mistake??? Well, I too have done that... and then later realised that this 8% was not supposed to be claimed until the court part... Well did anything happen about that??? Did the bank say you had done it wrong, or was nothing said?? I assume your settlement was with the 8% also??

 

Are you claiming against other banks now???

 

Enjoy your hard earned dollar!!

 

Maxine

Moodle

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...