Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sunak tried to stop the public seeing this report. Rishi Sunak ordered to publish secret analysis showing Universal Credit cut impact - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK As Chancellor, Rishi Sunak ignored pleas from campaigners including footballer Marcus Rashford by scrapping the £20-per-week Universal Credit...  
    • A full-scale strike at the firm could have an impact on the global supply chains of electronics.View the full article
    • He was one of four former top executives from Sam Bankman-Fried's firms to plead guilty to charges.View the full article
    • The private submersible industry was shaken after the implosion of the OceanGate Titan sub last year.View the full article
    • further polished WS using above suggestions and also included couple of more modifications highlighted in orange are those ok to include?   Background   1.1  The Defendant received the Parking Charge Notice (PCN) on the 06th of January 2020 following the vehicle being parked at Arla Old Dairy, South Ruislip on the 05th of December 2019.   Unfair PCN   2.1  On 19th December 2023 the Defendant sent the Claimant's solicitors a CPR request.  As shown in Exhibit 1 (pages 7-13) sent by the solicitors the signage displayed in their evidence clearly shows a £60.00 parking charge notice (which will be reduced to £30 if paid within 14 days of issue).  2.2  Yet the PCN sent by the Claimant is for a £100.00 parking charge notice (reduced to £60 if paid within 30 days of issue).   2.3        The Claimant relies on signage to create a contract.  It is unlawful for the Claimant to write that the charge is £60 on their signs and then send demands for £100.    2.4        The unlawful £100 charge is also the basis for the Claimant's Particulars of Claim.  No Locus Standi  3.1  I do not believe a contract with the landowner, that is provided following the defendant’s CPR request, gives MET Parking Services a right to bring claims in their own name. Definition of “Relevant contract” from the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4,  2 [1] means a contract Including a contract arising only when the vehicle was parked on the relevant land between the driver and a person who is-   (a) the owner or occupier of the land; or   (b) Authorised, under or by virtue of arrangements made by the owner or occupier of the land, to enter into a contract with the driver requiring the payment of parking charges in respect of the parking of the vehicle on the land. According to https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/44   For a contract to be valid, it requires a director from each company to sign and then two independent witnesses must confirm those signatures.   3.2  The Defendant requested to see such a contract in the CPR request.  The fact that no contract has been produced with the witness signatures present means the contract has not been validly executed. Therefore, there can be no contract established between MET Parking Services and the motorist. Even if “Parking in Electric Bay” could form a contract (which it cannot), it is immaterial. There is no valid contract.  Illegal Conduct – No Contract Formed   4.1 At the time of writing, the Claimant has failed to provide the following, in response to the CPR request from myself.   4.2        The legal contract between the Claimant and the landowner (which in this case is Standard Life Investments UK) to provide evidence that there is an agreement in place with landowner with the necessary authority to issue parking charge notices and to pursue payment by means of litigation.   4.3 Proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and country Planning Act 1990. Lack of planning permission is a criminal offence under this Act and no contract can be formed where criminality is involved.   4.4        I also do not believe the claimant possesses these documents.   No Keeper Liability   5.1        The defendant was not the driver at the time and date mentioned in the PCN and the claimant has not established keeper liability under schedule 4 of the PoFA 2012. In this matter, the defendant puts it to the claimant to produce strict proof as to who was driving at the time.   5.2 The claimant in their Notice To Keeper also failed to comply with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 section 9[2][f] while mentioning “the right to recover from the keeper so much of that parking charge as remains unpaid” where they did not include statement “(if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met)”.     5.3         The claimant did not mention parking period, times on the photographs are separate from the PCN and in any case are that arrival and departure times not the parking period since their times include driving to and from the parking space as a minimum and can include extra time to allow pedestrians and other vehicles to pass in front.    Protection of Freedoms Act 2012   The notice must -   (a) specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;  22. In the persuasive judgement K4GF167G - Premier Park Ltd v Mr Mathur - Horsham County Court – 5 January 2024 it was on this very point that the judge dismissed this claim.  5.4  A the PCN does not comply with the Act the Defendant as keeper is not liable.  No Breach of Contract   6.1       No breach of contract occurred because the PCN and contract provided as part of the defendant’s CPR request shows different post code, PCN shows HA4 0EY while contract shows HA4 0FY. According to PCN defendant parked on HA4 0EY which does not appear to be subject to the postcode covered by the contract.  6.2         The entrance sign does not mention anything about there being other terms inside the car park so does not offer a contract which makes it only an offer to treat,  Interest  7.1  It is unreasonable for the Claimant to delay litigation for  Double Recovery   7.2  The claim is littered with made-up charges.  7.3  As noted above, the Claimant's signs state a £60 charge yet their PCN is for £100.  7.4  As well as the £100 parking charge, the Claimant seeks recovery of an additional £70.  This is simply a poor attempt to circumvent the legal costs cap at small claims.  7.5 Since 2019, many County Courts have considered claims in excess of £100 to be an abuse of process leading to them being struck out ab initio. An example, in the Caernarfon Court in VCS v Davies, case No. FTQZ4W28 on 4th September 2019, District Judge Jones-Evans stated “Upon it being recorded that District Judge Jones- Evans has over a very significant period of time warned advocates (...) in many cases of this nature before this court that their claim for £60 is unenforceable in law and is an abuse of process and is nothing more than a poor attempt to go behind the decision of the Supreme Court v Beavis which inter alia decided that a figure of £160 as a global sum claimed in this case would be a penalty and not a genuine pre-estimate of loss and therefore unenforceable in law and if the practice continued, he would treat all cases as a claim for £160 and therefore a penalty and unenforceable in law it is hereby declared (…) the claim is struck out and declared to be wholly without merit and an abuse of process.”  7.6 In Claim Nos. F0DP806M and F0DP201T, District Judge Taylor echoed earlier General Judgment or Orders of District Judge Grand, stating ''It is ordered that the claim is struck out as an abuse of process. The claim contains a substantial charge additional to the parking charge which it is alleged the Defendant contracted to pay. This additional charge is not recoverabl15e under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, Schedule 4 nor with reference to the judgment in Parking Eye v Beavis. It is an abuse of process from the Claimant to issue a knowingly inflated claim for an additional sum which it is not entitled to recover. This order has been made by the court of its own initiative without a hearing pursuant to CPR Rule 3.3(4)) of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998...''  7.7 In the persuasive case of G4QZ465V - Excel Parking Services Ltd v Wilkinson – Bradford County Court -2 July 2020 (Exhibit 4) the judge had decided that Excel had won. However, due to Excel adding on the £60 the Judge dismissed the case.  7.8        The addition of costs not previously specified on signage are also in breach of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, Schedule 2, specifically paras 6, 10 and 14.   7.9        It is the Defendant’s position that the Claimant in this case has knowingly submitted inflated costs and thus the entire claim should be similarly struck out in accordance with Civil Procedure Rule 3.3(4).   In Conclusion   8.1        I invite the court to dismiss the claim.  Statement of Truth  I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disciplinary Work Hearing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4480 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, i see many viewings but not much advice about my situation and my appeal hearing, all advice welcome,

 

Simple fact is that the employer has believed a witness over and above your own version of events, so your appeal can only be on the basis that it was not you who caused the damage, the damage was not present when you left the room, so it must have been caused after you left. You mention in your OP that you are on restricted duties - why is this, and what acts have occurred previously which make you believe that your dismissal might be due to you being a hinderance?

 

If your restricted duties are due to a disability, or a work related incident, then it might add weight to a claim for Unfair Dismissal. I certainly think that any appeal that you have needs to be firmly put forward that you did not do it, would never do it, believe that the allegation is malicious and the employer has not fully sought to establish whether this is the case, the allegation and subsequent disciplinary action are due to you being on restricted duties and that you fully intend to take legal action if your appeal is not upheld.

 

Unfortunately you do not have an automatic right to be able to know who the witnesses or accusors are, but in those cases the employer should use such evidence to corroborate other factors, so I think that whist you cannot challenge the dismissal purely on the basis of not knowing who has made the statements, it should be mentioned that in denying this information the employer has removed much of your ability to challenge the evidence against you.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hello all, thanks for replies,

appeal hearing soon, i will see my legal advisor before then. during the year 2011 i was sent home unpaid because i could not undertake all duties due to my medical ability, i was unpaid for these events, no meeting about why i would be sent home or letter, my contract states 42hr per wk, so as i see it this was breach of my contract so this current event leads me to believe that the above situation was taken into account as well. Also i now know who the witness informant is, he has admitted this to my work friend and states that he was constantly asked to provide a statement by work and done so under pressure, but he said he is not willing to provide a statement saying this for fear of his own job, this witness was not named but his department was during my disciplinary meetings by myself because i had a good idea who it was in the end. this person around this time was made to change shifts due to an alteration in his department and i stated that this person worked in this department had good reason to cause the damage due to changing shifts and loosing close work mates, this was not even considered before my dismissal, yet now proves that i was correct in the witness being that of one who had reason .

do you think i have a right to ask for this person to now be present for my appeal??????????????

all advice welcome, oh by the way if the appeal does not get overturned then i will start my tribunal claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello all, thanks for replies,

appeal hearing soon, i will see my legal advisor before then. during the year 2011 i was sent home unpaid because i could not undertake all duties due to my medical ability, i was unpaid for these events, no meeting about why i would be sent home or letter, my contract states 42hr per wk, so as i see it this was breach of my contract so this current event leads me to believe that the above situation was taken into account as well. Also i now know who the witness informant is, he has admitted this to my work friend and states that he was constantly asked to provide a statement by work and done so under pressure, but he said he is not willing to provide a statement saying this for fear of his own job, this witness was not named but his department was during my disciplinary meetings by myself because i had a good idea who it was in the end. this person around this time was made to change shifts due to an alteration in his department and i stated that this person worked in this department had good reason to cause the damage due to changing shifts and loosing close work mates, this was not even considered before my dismissal, yet now proves that i was correct in the witness being that of one who had reason .

do you think i have a right to ask for this person to now be present for my appeal??????????????

all advice welcome, oh by the way if the appeal does not get overturned then i will start my tribunal claim

 

 

It is difficult to respond because I cannot follow some of what you are saying.

 

 

You now have a good idea but no actual proof of the identity of the worker who accused you and you were sacked on the basis of that accusation. You also say that that worker had an axe to grind with management over shift changes and probably did it himself. There are still no witnesses and from what you posted earllier, the CCTV seems to back you up as the timing indicates that you left before the damage occured.

 

You can bring all this up in your appeal. I do not know if you can ask that person to be called as a witness prior to getting an admission from him or from management confirming that he made the statement accusing you of being the vandal.

 

 

We need to know more about your health condition. If you have a health problem that has lasted or is likely to last for more than 12 months and it affects your ability to carry out day to day tasks ( this does not mean that you cannot do stuff but that it is painful or difficult for you to do them) you may qualify as disabled under the Equality Act 2010.

 

If you are disabled, you may be able add that to your unfair dismissal claim.

 

My understanding of the law is very basic. However, I believe that an employer can fairly dismiss a worker if it believes that he has done something wrong. This is called "reasonable belief", there does not have to be any actual proof. You would have to show that the employer acted unreasonably.

 

A process was gone through but other workers used the urinal and could just as easily have vandalised it. Management wanted to get rid of someone and picked the worker with the health problem because they did not like making adjustments for you. Having to go home because you could not cope with particular aspects of the job was an adjustment. The fact that you were not paid for this health related absence implies that the employer was unsympathetic to your condition.

 

I would be conscious of the timing here. It is best to submit your ET1 within 3 months of the urinal damage. If that date has passed, you can use the date of dismissal.

 

In my ignorant and unprofessional opinion, you have little chance of getting your job back on appeal. This has nothing to do with guilt or innocence it is just that management hardly ever reverse that type of decision.

 

Your chances of winning at Tribunal are also slim but not entirely hopeless. However, filling in an ET1 might make them decide to pay you off as defending the case would be expensive and their handling of the disciplinary process was poor.

 

I realise that this is very stressful for you. You appear to have been treated badly and are now without a job.

 

Please give details of you health problem so that CAGGERS can assist you further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello and thanks for reply

I do now know the identity of the informant because the said informant has told all this to my friend who has told me, yes i was sent home unpaid 7 times last year, yes my injury is to my lower back and is still being treated to this day. i have had this back issue for nearly three years and i do believe that this incident was related to my restrictive abilities.

the imformant stated thathe heard a noise 2 mins from him leaving the toilets and that puts me in the frame, but the informant as stated was made to change shifts around this time so in my opinion was the most likely to have caused it, i also understand that i have little chance of getting the job back but will do it if only for it helping with the et claim that will start soon, any more advice before i attend the meeting and legal team ? thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello and thanks for reply

I do now know the identity of the informant because the said informant has told all this to my friend who has told me, yes i was sent home unpaid 7 times last year, yes my injury is to my lower back and is still being treated to this day. i have had this back issue for nearly three years and i do believe that this incident was related to my restrictive abilities.

the imformant stated thathe heard a noise 2 mins from him leaving the toilets and that puts me in the frame, but the informant as stated was made to change shifts around this time so in my opinion was the most likely to have caused it, i also understand that i have little chance of getting the job back but will do it if only for it helping with the et claim that will start soon, any more advice before i attend the meeting and legal team ? thanks

 

The good news is that you may qualify as disabled. Did the employer offer any other assistance for your back problem other than sending you home unpaid? When was the last time this happened? How did you hurt your back?

 

As for the appeal, the main argument seems to be that you are losing your job because of an allegation made by another worker who refuses to identify himself. Unless he has reason to fear violence from you, that is a trifle odd. However, I do not think you can force the employer to reveal who dunnit.

 

Other people may have vandalised the urinal but only you are getting the sack. In my view, all suspects should be treated equally and this is not happening here. This is not a legal argument but one well worth pursuing at your appeal.

 

As your job has gone, you could mention your suspicions that your dismissal was disability related as I feel that you have little to lose.

 

I would put your appeal arguments in written form as it will provide a written record for you later and will also show if your arguments were considered or not.

 

The appeal is something that you must go through and there is no way out of it. What was the date of the vandalism? This is important because it determines when your ET1 claim should be made.

 

As I said before, if the vandalism occurred more than 3 months ago, you can use the date of dismissal and make your claim within 3 months of the dismissal dare. However, it is better to lodge the claim within 3 months of the vandalism, if that is possible.

You do not have to wait for the outcome of your appeal to lodge your ET claim. I assume that you would be claiming for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. You really need some legal advice on this. There is a Disability Legal service which will assist you by phone. You can look them up on the Net and book an appointment for a solicitor to call you back. I have used this service and it was better than nothing. I found the Legal Services phoneline was a lot more help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello and again thanks for reply, yes work assisted a little by putting me on restrictive duties, these areas had been set by the company physio in 03/2011 and 10/2011 but ONLY after i asked for this help, they NEVER started any action it was always me. the last time i was sent home unpaid was 2 days before the event of the damage, but on the day i was last sent home before this damage i asked for a meeting with the production manager about my getting sent home, this was the same person who dismissed me, in this meeting he stated that he could do nothing until my last physio works appt. so i left happy that maybe something good will come of it all, after the date of the damage i had several issues before my suspension , as it it nearly 4 months since the damage happened, and nearly six weeks since my dismissal i will start my et this week, any responses welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello and again thanks for reply, yes work assisted a little by putting me on restrictive duties, these areas had been set by the company physio in 03/2011 and 10/2011 but ONLY after i asked for this help, they NEVER started any action it was always me. the last time i was sent home unpaid was 2 days before the event of the damage, but on the day i was last sent home before this damage i asked for a meeting with the production manager about my getting sent home, this was the same person who dismissed me, in this meeting he stated that he could do nothing until my last physio works appt. so i left happy that maybe something good will come of it all, after the date of the damage i had several issues before my suspension , as it it nearly 4 months since the damage happened, and nearly six weeks since my dismissal i will start my et this week, any responses welcome
Ok so the urinal damage happened 4 months ago and the last time you were sent home unpaid was over 4 months ago.

 

You asked for a meeting about the unpaid medical suspension (being sent home without pay) and were given a vague promise that something would be done after your final OH appointment. I take this to mean that you would at least have had a chance of getting your lost wages back.

 

However, 2 days later the urinal damage. Ths could be a coincidence but did you not say that it was a full 16 days before a co-worker made an anonymous statement saying that you did the damage? This makes it look very fishy to me.

 

You could claim disability discrimination on the grounds that you had an ongoing situation with management relating to you back problem. An adjustment had been made, restrictive duties, but this had resulted in several periods of unpaid suspension which you were not happy about. Management had vaguely promised to take action but when an opportunity arose chose to dismiss you on the grounds of "reasonable belief" that you had damaged company property. There was no actual evidence that you did the damage and others who had opportunity were neither disciplined or dismissed. Your dismissal was based on a belated statement from an anonymous coworker, who was also a disgruntled employee.

 

I think it is looking good and you have a chance of at least getting your lost wages back and perhaps some compensation for injury to feelings, even if you lose the unfair dismissal part of your claim.

 

As I said before, you do need some legal advice so try the Legal Services Phoneline or the Disability Law phoneline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi KK

 

Sorry to hear you lost your appeal but got to ask this - Did your appeal hearing panel consist of any staff members that were involved in your previous disciplinary hearing?

 

So they have relied upon a witness statement sent by email that is not only unsigned, not signed by seperate witness and more importantly could have been written be any single staff member of that company including those involved in the disciplinary and appeal hearing.

 

They have refused numerous requests by yourself for said witness to be present so you may cross examine as you are legally entitled to. The company has refused your request stating only that they wish to remain anonemous and gave you no further information under which company policy procedure or law act this is allowed.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi thanks for response. yes the above is true i did not know who the informant was at the time of my dismissal and was not allowed to speak to him, but at my appeal stage i was told who he was and yes work said that this person that i named was the informant but despite my request to again ask him myself they presented a signed statement from him stating the same as before, they also gave me a statement from the last person to enter the toilets after myself . this person did not see any damage and yes he did speak with the informant but the informant did not mention the damage ie water on the floor,

i do have good evidence that has been obtained but cannot disclose this , so we will await the et3 response from work , thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, not much help but,

 

Did your appeal hearing panel consist of any staff members that were involved in your previous disciplinary hearing?
Hardly an appeal if the same people were on the panel.

So the "evidence" is the cctv footage of people entering and leaving the toilets, ,and the word of an anonymous witness who spent 20 minutes in a cubicle? ( I know if I disappear for that length of time they send out a search party )

Is your back injury work related or was it known about when the company employed you?

Unfair dismissal seems to be the way to go. I don't think they want you back and realistically I don't think you would want to go back after the way you have been treated.

( just re-read the thread and noticed your mention of "ET", I hope you mean "Employment Tribunal". Have you filled in your ET1 form?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ,yes have sent et1 off, no my back injury is not work related and yes from early 2011 occupational health had been involved, this still did not stop my unpaid sendings home though, yes they used the reasonable belief issue, with regards the cctv and at the time of my dismissal the annonymous witness, who i now know but was still not allowed to talk direct with him during my appeal, all i was given was a second statement stating he heard a noise late on and that indicates me on the cctv, we will wait to see what develops with the return of the et3 from my ex employer. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...