Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have been in the motor trade for 35 years and have used hundreds of companies for a variety of repairs, only once have i had a major problem which i sorted out in County Court and won. I had a Vauxhall Insignia with an engine fault and advertised on 1st Choice car repairs site for a repair.  Jack, actually his alias Lee contacted us with a quote which we accepted. We transported the car to Unit 4/18 Burnt Mills Road North Benfleet SS129JX expecting its return within the promised 28 days. I have had every excuse you could possibly imagine, in the last 2 YEARS!! as to why the car is not repaired. Ecu faults, Ignition faults, Gearbox faults, Exhaust faults, Wiring chaffing faults, Communication faults, Cancer treatment delaying the repair, medical treatment in Turkey delaying the repair, Covid delaying the repair!! The man is a pathological liar and a fraud. He is now refusing to tell me where the car is and refusing me access to collect it. He is under investigation by trading standards dept Jasper Singh officer in the case but he just keeps getting away with it. Police say its a civil debt and not a criminal offence. 1st choice do not want to know, they refuse to do anything other than request the car be repaired directly by UK169 which is of course ignored I found recently all the posts on this site about Jack and his tactics but it was too late. To date i am £6200 out of pocket to this man and it appears the law is powerless to deal with dishonest rogues.
    • The missing parcel is Evri uk , it was going from Shropshire to Cornwall and has gone missing.   but it got me wondering as i also sent a parcel abroad the same day if that had gone missing where would i stand ...    
    • Another farce kicking everything into the long grass - as usual for these corporate and political criminals Post Office scandal: Police to deploy 80 detectives for criminal inquiry. Investigation will dig into potential perjury offences and perverting the course of justice by senior leaders and Fujitsu   Police have asked government for a special grant of at least £6.75m to fund the operation. Police will not seek charging decisions, that is send files of evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service, until after the public inquiry into the Post Office scandal concludes, which is expected in autumn 2025.   It is expected the CPS will not reach charging decisions until 2026, and the wait for any criminal trials could be even longer.     Post Office scandal: Police to deploy 80 detectives for criminal inquiry | Post Office Horizon scandal | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Investigation will dig into potential perjury offences and perverting the course of justice by senior leaders and Fujitsu    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Any info would be appreciated


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6455 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have started this thread on behalf of a freind as he does not have access to a computer.

 

He has moved into his house about 3 months ago, but he had the keys given to him about 4 months ago but did not move in until a month after as there was no electric and the landlord was going to arrange for the meter to get fixed. He didnt mind as he had asked if he could repaint the living room and slowly get all his furniture moved in.

 

He explained to the landlord that he was going to repaint and move his stuff in and the landlord only gave him a back door key as the landlord explained that the front was to be kept for the electricians who would need to gain access to get the electricity up and running.

 

He has paid all his rent up to date up till now but only from the actual date he moved in (3 months rent). The landlord has now stated that as he had the keys for four months, he wants 4 months rent, even though he had not moved in entirely and did not even have a front door key and no electric.

 

Does he have to pay from the month he had the back door key, or should his tennancy start from when he actually moved in? He didnt move in prior to this as there was no electric but was not to bothered as he was allowed the back door key to redecorate the living area in the daytime when there was enough light to do so.

 

Surely the landlord cannot allow someone to move in with no electric and cannot demand money for the month that he only had the backdoor key but not moved in?

 

Also the landlord has since contacted his parent and has dicussed the problem with her over the phone as my freind could not be reached on the day as he was in work. The landlord discussed matters that had nothing to do with anyone other than the land lord and my freind in question. Surely this is not allowed and all information held should be kept confidential even if it was his mum?

 

Any help would be appreciated so that i can pass it on to him, he is getting really worried now and is not sure what to do. I have told him of this web site and explained that i will start a thread to try and get him some help which he is most grateful.

 

Thanks for taking the time to read this thread and look forward to your replies

 

Becky :razz:

ABBEY: Owed £1.140 :mad:

06/07/06 - Requested Statements

07/08/06 - Request For Repayment Letter Sent Totaling £1,140

29/08/06 - LBA Sent

15/09/06 - Received reply offering £570 as a final settlement

25/09/06 - Accepted offer but ONLY as a partial repayment, & notified them that i am still going to persue for the remainder of the money

01/10/06 - Set up court date

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st it sounds like he has a lousy landlord & he should start looking around for somewhere else to live now. This landlord gives every impression that he's going to be an ongoing problem for you friend.

 

If he agreed to let your friend have a key only so he could decorate & there was no electricity then he his renaging on the deal & you friend can refuse to pay.

 

Yes it is a breach of the DPA for the landlord to discuss private matters with the parents unless you friend gave the landlord their no as a means of contact & didn't tell him NOT to divulge information.

 

Questions that need answered.

 

Does he have a tenancy agreement & from when is it dated.

 

Has the electricians work been inspected & certified by the electricity supplier.

 

Is your friend the registered with the utility company as the customer & if so from what date

 

As well as the above the meter tariff setting should have been checked to ensure that the landlord is not onselling the supply to your friend. In other words the landlord can only charge the same for the utility supply that it costs him.

 

An example would be (& it used to be common practice) if you go onto a caravan site & want electricity supplied to your van & the site owner asks for an extra fixed payment then they are breach of the law

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both for replying, i am going to print out you replies and show them to my feind so that he can answer the questions asked.

 

I do know that his parent did not go as guarantour.

 

Thanks both i will let you know how it turns out

 

Becky :p

ABBEY: Owed £1.140 :mad:

06/07/06 - Requested Statements

07/08/06 - Request For Repayment Letter Sent Totaling £1,140

29/08/06 - LBA Sent

15/09/06 - Received reply offering £570 as a final settlement

25/09/06 - Accepted offer but ONLY as a partial repayment, & notified them that i am still going to persue for the remainder of the money

01/10/06 - Set up court date

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...