Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA.  I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPCM to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and it is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week.
    • It probably deletes after a certain time. What a shame you did not check at the time. However I have no doubt that there was a PCN envelope under your windscreen wiper  as shown quite clearly on one of the photographs. . It would seem strange that it was placed there empty hence the reason I stated a second Notice was issued [though not necessarily sent. As I said in that letter to IPC that was not what the complaint was about and probably  IPC will ask about that at the same time if they accept you  going direct to IPC for the other matter. It is immaterial how many original PCNs were issued or not issued. You are able to show the two that you have from their sar one of which coincides with the one you received in the post and that is the one that does not agree with the date times of PoFA. Thus breaching not only the Act, but also the IPC  Code of Conduct and the ability of UKPCM to obtain data from the DVLA. So leave that part of the letter as good to go. However as it is as Dave [Thank you Dave!} pointed out that it is UKPCM and not UKPCI have amended the letter and posted it below.
    • Its based on 10% annual depreciation, divided by 52 weeks and then x the excess number of weeks that they have had the vehicle for, after the agreed initial 3 week repair.
    • LOL LOL LOL Don't need that many to deport a handful of volunteers - at best Home Office department processing Rwanda deportations told to cut jobs Exclusive: Illegal Migration Operations Command freezes recruitment and draws up redundancy plans, leaked documents show Cant have hundreds of well paid people in a department deporting a single volunteer when we have an upcoming election to lose now can we - VIPal drenched in riches and departments full of pals well paid for doing nowt will 'sadly soon be history - was rumored to in a text from a soon to be ex-minister texting in from one of his main jobs in a number of industries he will soon be unable to help.   Home Office department processing Rwanda deportations told to cut jobs | Immigration and asylum | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Illegal Migration Operations Command freezes recruitment and draws up redundancy plans, leaked documents show  
    • try it.... use recuva or file scavenger or glary utils
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

partial settlement v full and final


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4570 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok, simple way to satisfy yourself, go get a debt, then sell it to the Rankines and simply walk away debt free LOL :rolleyes:

 

before I tried that I would like to have some idea of the likely outcome which is presumably why this discussion was started in the first place

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 203
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ok then all we need is to find tramp on the streets of london or any big city ( oh there's one, there's another whoops look there's loads of them ) who has absolutely no assets whatsoever, ignore the clause in every agreement that says the debtor cannot sell or assign the debt and sell him EVERY credit agreement in the country

 

there you go problem solved!!

 

or better still every bankrupt in the country can get a friend with a good credit rating to take out a 10,000 credit card then sell it to him the next day for 10p - problem solved!

 

 

trickie dickie i really am surprised at you!!

 

Not as surprised as I am that no one has actually tackled Rankines proposition and his assertions that there are no laws presently to prevent what he says he can do.

If there are such laws what are they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is , and its a discussion forum too

 

however, as i see it, its for discussion on topics which have merit which this sell us your debt rubbish doesnt in my opinion

 

So you think that the fact that over 1000 consumers have paid Rankine over a million pounds for something which may or may not be possible is of no consequence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you think that the fact that over 1000 consumers have paid Rankine over a million pounds for something which may or may not be possible is of no consequence?

 

and the banks/dca's are still chasing these 1000 customers for their money ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you think that the fact that over 1000 consumers have paid Rankine over a million pounds for something which may or may not be possible is of no consequence?

as i understand it, from the contact i have at Birmingham City Council Trading standards , they are subject to an OFT investigation for taking part in licensable activities without a licence

 

says it all imho

Link to post
Share on other sites

well dont forget, under Limitations , they have 6 years to sue and id point out also that, the banks probably wont sue him any way as they will sue the debtor

 

Well I guess we just have to wait for the OFT and trading standards to come to a conclusion but what takes so long,for six months the guy has been adv ertising on his website and standing in front of 50 people at a time and taking their money.Surely someone from the OFT could have had him charged well before now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rankines answer to that is that he has been 'buying ' debts for 6 months and no lenders have taken legal action yet

 

well of course the creditors havnt taken any action

 

thats because there is no action to take

 

when their customer defaults they wil chase them and compeltely ignore rankine

Link to post
Share on other sites

How to say f*** o** in 200 words:

Dear Sir,

 

Further to your press release today:

72/09 23 June 2009 OFT warns consumers about 'debt sale' scams

 

 

where the OFT claim that:

 

'The OFT will not hesitate to take swift action against businesses which deliberately mislead consumers.'

 

Could you please tell me what action, if any, the OFT are taking against Basil & Amanda Rankine who run the Credit Card Killer website: Credit Card Killer - Cancel your credit agreements.

 

 

To my knowledge, they have been (and still are) offering to buy credit card, loans, overdrafts and car loans since January 2009

 

 

Thank you for your email to Consumer Direct dated 23/06/09. Your reference number for this case is LR - 520574 and should be quoted in all further correspondence regarding this matter.

 

Based on the information you have provided the key legal points in response to your enquiry are as follows:

 

Consumer Direct is required to remain impartial; as such, we would not be able to disclose specific information about this trader. For further information regarding our remit, please visit the ‘about us’ section of our website, detailed below. However, we can suggest ways in which you would be able to gain this information. One way would be to make a formal request under the Freedom of Information Act (2000), which requires public authorities to disclose certain information on request. If you would like to make a request under this Act, you would need to write to the following address:

 

Consumer Direct London

International House

7 High Street

Ealing

London

W5 5DB

 

You will need to include your own name and contact details, and be clear about the information you are requesting. We aim to respond to requests of this nature within 20 working days.

 

This may be an issue that the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) would like to investigate. The OFT’s job is to watch over consumer markets, and ensure that businesses are acting fairly. The OFT has a role in promoting consumer interests, and so by reporting your comments and experiences to this body you would be able to add to their intelligence. The more complaints about an industry the OFT receive, the more likely it is that they would make the issue a priority. The OFT has access to all cases created by Consumer Direct, and so they will be made aware of this matter also.

 

Misleading information can be considered an offence; as such from the information given, a case has been created and will be passed to the Trading Standards where this trader appears to be based, for their intelligence purposes. If you require any further advice or information about this case, please do not hesitate to contact Consumer Direct on 08454 04 05 06 quoting the case reference number.

 

Thank you for your enquiry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, i have searched Westlaw, Lawtel, LexisNexis and Justis and there is no mention anywhere of a single case where someone has done what Rankine profess to be able to do,

 

now they claimed to have found something that we had all missed , in fact they said we were all wrong on this very forum and didnt know what we were doing

 

However HHJ Brown QC proved that one was wrong didnt he.

 

so its not the first time they have claimed to have found something exclusive only to be found wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, i have searched Westlaw, Lawtel, LexisNexis and Justis and there is no mention anywhere of a single case where someone has done what Rankine profess to be able to do,

 

now they claimed to have found something that we had all missed , in fact they said we were all wrong on this very forum and didnt know what we were doing

 

However HHJ Brown QC proved that one was wrong didnt he.

 

so its not the first time they have claimed to have found something exclusive only to be found wrong

 

Well Rankine said no one had ever tried this before so it looks like he is right about that anyway as he claims to already have taken on 9 million pounds of other peoples debts and racking up more every day so it will be interesting to see what happens.

He apparently guarantees that none of his clients will wind up in court and if they are taken to court by their lender he appoints a solicitor to represent them.

It will be interesting to see what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what's probably more important is that he has taken onb xxx peoples fees for a "service" that he cant provide

 

if its a limited company the guarantees are not worth a light are they!

 

so this guy can bring down the finances of the entire western world then can he!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it he takes on the debts personally rather than using a limited company.

As for him bringing down the finances of the western world I hardly think Rankines help is needed there between the governments and banks they are doing a first class job of that already.

Rankine may be a clown but he has a long way to go before he is in the same league as the clowns who run the government and financial institutions.

Rankine issued a winding up petition to HBOS on the grounds of insolvency 2 years before the government had to bail it out-because it was insolvent.

The judge dismissed the petition without considering it on the grounds that it was clearly preposterous and vexatious.

Just about every major financial institution and government is now technically insolvent and the only reason that the whole system has not collapsed is because they all collude together and 99.9999% of the population can't be bothered to look beyond the spin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it he takes on the debts personally rather than using a limited company.

As for him bringing down the finances of the western world I hardly think Rankines help is needed there between the governments and banks they are doing a first class job of that already.

Rankine may be a clown but he has a long way to go before he is in the same league as the clowns who run the government and financial institutions.

Rankine issued a winding up petition to HBOS on the grounds of insolvency 2 years before the government had to bail it out-because it was insolvent.

The judge dismissed the petition without considering it on the grounds that it was clearly preposterous and vexatious.

Just about every major financial institution and government is now technically insolvent and the only reason that the whole system has not collapsed is because they all collude together and 99.9999% of the population can't be bothered to look beyond the spin.

 

if he's running this outfit without the security of a limited liability company ill eat my hat and show my arse in burtons window

 

 

its a [problem] and stupid- he aint!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if he's running this outfit without the security of a limited liability company ill eat my hat and show my arse in burtons window

 

 

its a [problem] and stupid- he aint!!

you have a fantastic way with words :lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

discussed elsewhere - this is not possible. This is proven by the absence of any legal argument to show it is.

 

as for why are people paying him? Why do folk reply to Nigerian princes?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went to one of their seminars in London last week. Must have been a few hundred people present, most of whom appeared to be professional mortgage brokers or similar. I would also point out that at least half walked out during the course of the seminar - no doubt due to the rambling on of the speaker. The 2nd half (don't ask me why I stayed that long) was a 'marketing' workshop. Basically, telling professional brokers to go down the pub and leave cards around with your name on, or leaflet drop cards in a road whenever you have an appointment with a client in that road. NOT very professional and veering on cold calling !!! But maybe that is the way they do business in his native Birmingham ! I was speaking to one gentleman who 'transferred' his credit card debt under their scheme a few weeks ago - and received a letter from the credit card basically telling him they did not recognise the transfer.

 

I also spoke to Rankine afterwards, and was struck by his total lack of professionalism, and by his ability to avoid direct answers by rambling.

 

This scheme sounds too good to be true - and I am sure that is the case. He can't lose - takes the 10% plus the £350, does nothing, and doesn't give a sh*t if the card holder loses his credit status, gets sued and ends up having to pay the full card balance to the Card Company - in addition to having paid the 10%. All Rankine has to do is pull in the ££££'s over the next few months - and then disappear with millions !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went to one of their seminars in London last week. Must have been a few hundred people present, most of whom appeared to be professional mortgage brokers or similar. I would also point out that at least half walked out during the course of the seminar - no doubt due to the rambling on of the speaker. The 2nd half (don't ask me why I stayed that long) was a 'marketing' workshop. Basically, telling professional brokers to go down the pub and leave cards around with your name on, or leaflet drop cards in a road whenever you have an appointment with a client in that road. NOT very professional and veering on cold calling !!! But maybe that is the way they do business in his native Birmingham ! I was speaking to one gentleman who 'transferred' his credit card debt under their scheme a few weeks ago - and received a letter from the credit card basically telling him they did not recognise the transfer.

 

I also spoke to Rankine afterwards, and was struck by his total lack of professionalism, and by his ability to avoid direct answers by rambling.

 

This scheme sounds too good to be true - and I am sure that is the case. He can't lose - takes the 10% plus the £350, does nothing, and doesn't give a sh*t if the card holder loses his credit status, gets sued and ends up having to pay the full card balance to the Card Company - in addition to having paid the 10%. All Rankine has to do is pull in the ££££'s over the next few months - and then disappear with millions !!

Thanks for this, it confirms my view .

 

incidently, i went to one of these seminars too, and exactly the same issues arose. He is like a politician as he never answers direct questions, the words dont touch and Barge pole spring to mind

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4570 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...