Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fictitious amount on claim form


palemm
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4571 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Rang the court they said fairfax have tried to get a default judgement and I need to get my defence in and there is no stay on the case.

 

So Fairfax are lying to me.

 

I f my defence is due next week can I send the court a copy of the letter that Fairfax sent me for more time, or do I do a negative defence with copies of all letters as evidence or can I file a N244 even though my defence is due ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having read the pt.legal compilation pdf I think N244 is the way forward and I quote.

 

"

1) an order compelling the Claimant to disclose the requested documents

2) an extension of time not less than 28 days from the date of the order for filing your defence.

3) costs occasioned by the Claimants failings to disclose pursuant to CPR 31.14 and 31.15.

 

Looks to be the right thing.

 

Any help with wording appriciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, posts crossed. Yup, that’s the bit.

 

One thing I wanted to check, which wasn’t answered at the start of the thread: did you ever actually get a default notice from Lloyds, or a Notice of Assignment (either from Lloyds or Arrow)?

 

You can only answer the claim as stated. If you have never held any account with Lloyds under a credit agreement, that would be a defence.

 

Anyway, back to N244. What you need to do is write a simple statement of what has happened. Something like this, but with detail:

 

1. I received a claim form from Arrow on XX XXX 2011.

2. I acknowledged the claim and requested a further 14 days to defend all.

3. I issued a CPR 31 request to the claimant’s solicitor on XX XXX 2011, giving them seven days to provide the documents mentioned in the particulars of claim (see attached letter).

4. I received a response from the claimant’s solicitor on XX XXX 2011 stating that no documents would be provided before I entered a defence (see attached letter).

5. I wrote back to the claimant’s solicitor on XX XXX 2011 making clear that I expected them to comply with my valid CPR request (see attached letter).

6. The claimant’s solicitor replied on XX XXX 2011, stating that they required several weeks to locate the documents and that they would delay the court case (see attached letter). I found this unacceptable.

7. I called the court for advice on 9 November 2011 and was told the claimant’s solicitor had already applied for, and had been refused, default judgment.

8. Without said documents as mentioned in the PoC, I am unable to enter a defence. I further deny ever having any kind of credit agreement with Lloyds TSB Bank, as stated in the particulars of claim, and without any evidence of the alleged debt, I am embarrassed.

9. Accordingly, I seek an order of the court compelling the claimant to comply with my valid CPR 31 request within seven days, failing which the case shall be struck out and costs awarded to the defendant.

 

Then add the draft order as above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I hand write the statement in the evidence box or will it be ok to print it and say "Please see statement" in the evidence box.

 

I want to get it right, plus I have a broken hand and it hurts to right.:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

This kind of puts a spanner in the works due to lack of funds, any other options ?

 

Oh well looks like a negative defence is the only way mentioning the fact that I requested the documents under CPR 31.14 and they refused

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I have to send payment to the court to file the N244 ?

 

And if so how do I pay ?

 

 

Usually payment is made by cheque but I think some Courts take card payments over the phone.

 

The cost is £45 without a hearing or £80 with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my defence........

 

I am unable to plead as the claimant has failed to comply with my request for documents mentioned in the claim.

 

I issued a CPR 31 request to the claimant’s solicitor on 29/10/2011, giving them seven days to provide the documents mentioned in the particulars of claim (see attached letter).

I then received a response from the claimant’s solicitor on 02/112011 stating that no documents would be provided before I entered a defence (see attached letter).

I wrote back to the claimant’s solicitor on 05/11/2011 making clear that I expected them to comply with my valid CPR request (see attached letter) and stating I would contact them by telephone on the 07/11/2011.

I rang them on the morning of the 07/11/2011 I told them I was seeking an extension of time under CPR 15.5 to allow them to comply with my CPR 31.14 and CPR 31.15 request and for me to inspect the documents and form my defence and was told that the case would be put on hold until they could get copies of all the documents that they're claim is based on.

The claimant’s solicitor replied on 07/11/2011 with what can only be described as a vague letter. (see attached letter). I find this unacceptable.

I ask that the court order disclosure of the documents that this claim is based on so I can know what I'm defending myself against or strike out the claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...